See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid

Waterman Canyon Post Acute

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise compassionate individual cnas and nurses. Still worth an in-person visit.

1850 N. Waterman Ave., San Bernardino, CA 92404166 bedsLicensed & Active
4/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
3.3/5

based on 118 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Waterman Canyon Post Acute Nursing Home in San Bernardino, CA — Street View
Street View

Watch Waterman Canyon Post Acute

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While certain staff members are exceptionally dedicated to patient care and rehabilitation, the facility has a documented history of hygiene issues and night-shift neglect. If you choose this facility, we recommend frequent, unannounced visits and direct communication with the Director of Nursing to ensure cleanliness and medication standards are being met.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

118 reviews on Google
Families should approach this facility with significant caution due to frequent and serious allegations regarding hygiene, neglect, and inadequate staffing during night shifts. While some long-term residents and their families praise specific CNAs and the rehabilitation therapy, there is a recurring pattern of complaints involving unpleasant odors, unhygienic living conditions, and delayed medical responses.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food4.0Staff3.0Clean1.0Activities8.0Meds2.0MemoryN/AComms2.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate individual CNAs and nurses
  • Effective physical and occupational therapy
  • Engaging community outings and activities
  • Supportive admissions and social services staff

Concerns

  • Poor facility hygiene and unpleasant odors (mentioned by 7 reviewers)
  • Inadequate staffing or slow response times during night/weekend shifts (mentioned by 5 reviewers)
  • Neglect regarding hygiene and diaper changes (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • Unprofessional or rude communication from staff (mentioned by 4 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'12(1)'16(2)'18(3)'20(12)'22(12)'24(5)'26(8)

Distribution · 120 analyzed

5
61
4
4
3
5
2
4
1
46

How They Respond to Reviews

100%response rate
Generic

The owner relies heavily on templated, repetitive responses that often use boilerplate language to acknowledge feedback. While they attempt to provide contact information for resolution, the responses frequently fail to address the specific details of the complaints.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard wonderful things about your therapy teams and community outings; could you tell us more about the types of activities planned for the residents each week?
  • 2How does the nursing team manage routine hygiene and personal care, especially during the overnight and weekend shifts?
  • 3What specific protocols do you have in place to ensure the facility remains clean, fresh, and well-maintained for the residents?
  • 4Could you walk us through your process for medication management and how you ensure accuracy and timely administration?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the immediate procedure for contacting physicians and notifying the family?
  • 6We noticed the admissions staff is very supportive; how does the communication flow between the clinical staff and family members regarding daily updates?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff was nothing but great to me and I give thanks to Araceli Rodriguez the DSD for hiring such amazing CNAs.

Rehab patient · 2025★★★★★

I am very disgusted with this place as I walked in the facility i got the bad smell of urine and some other kind of smell I feel so bad for all the patients

Visitor · 2025☆☆☆☆

The casino outting was fun! The staff was there to support us in our experience.

Resident · 2025★★★★★
Source: 118 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
0.23hrs
31%
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
3.81hrs
93%
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
46%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
36%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

Both RN and total nursing hours are below national benchmarks. This can mean less clinical attention per resident, so ask about their staffing plan.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
4/ 5
Better Than Avg

11

measures

Worse Than Avg

4

measures

Mixed Results

2

measures

Long-Stay Residents
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility47.0%
Worse than Avg
Here
47.0%
US
12.1%
CA
7.0%
San bernardino
10.2%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

🚶

Residents whose walking got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility23.3%
Worse than Avg
Here
23.3%
US
15.3%
CA
10.5%
San bernardino
10.4%
🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility22.7%
Worse than Avg
Here
22.7%
US
14.4%
CA
10.4%
San bernardino
11.1%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility4.7%
Better than Avg
Here
4.7%
US
15.4%
CA
11.6%
San bernardino
8.9%
💉

Residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
93.4%
CA
98.6%
San bernardino
98.8%
🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility13.2%
Mixed vs Avgs
Here
13.2%
US
19.4%
CA
10.7%
San bernardino
8.5%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility99.3%
Better than Avg
Here
99.3%
US
79.7%
CA
93.2%
San bernardino
94.0%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
81.8%
CA
94.2%
San bernardino
97.2%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.4%
Better than Avg
Here
0.4%
US
1.6%
CA
1.5%
San bernardino
1.2%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

5deficiencies
Well below state avg (15.4)
17 complaint-triggered

Families have filed 14 complaints against this facility, triggering investigations that found deficiencies in care quality, resident rights, and protection from neglect. The most recurring problems involve care planning and treatment, medication management, and environmental safety issues like inadequate room sizes and equipment failures. While all deficiencies show correction dates, the pattern of repeated complaints through 2025 suggests ongoing quality concerns that families should carefully evaluate during visits.

Feb 25, 2026Complaint
1
0553Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.

Sep 23, 2025Complaint
1
0627Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.

May 13, 2025Complaint
1
0628Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

Mar 21, 2025Routine
5
0345Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

0511Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Services Deficiencies

Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

0741Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Miscellaneous Deficiencies

Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.

0609Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

0912Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Environmental Deficiencies

Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.

Mar 6, 2025Complaint
1
0676Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.

Jan 21, 2025Complaint
1
0550Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Waterman Canyon Post Acute

Organization Type

for profit

Chain Affiliation

Chain Name

Pacs Group

Chain Size

279 facilities nationwide

Chain avg rating: 2.9/5 · Rank 86 of 260

Ownership & Management

Key personnel

Golboo, SepehrContracted Managing EmployeeJenkins, NicolettaW-2 Managing EmployeeApt, FrederickOfficer / DirectorHancock, MarkOfficer / DirectorJergensen, JoshuaOfficer / Director
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call