Limited public data on Westchester Harbour at Providence Place. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 9 Google reviews
Email Westchester Harbour at Providence Place to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit Westchester Harbour at Providence Place in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
Families can expect a facility with a highly praised activities program and a welcoming atmosphere for new residents. However, there are significant concerns regarding the professionalism of management and the quality of food, with one reviewer describing the dining as unsuitable for seniors with chewing difficulties.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 9 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff and people are wonderful and the facility itself is top notch. Also Nikki does an amazing job with activities and is so kind.”
“The director Donna and the memory care director Kim have the worse bedside manner I have ever experienced. They are both rude, unsympathetic and unprofessional.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure that 8 ounces of milk or equivalent dairy products were served three times daily to residents in the Special Care Unit. During meal services on January 7 and January 8, 2025, multiple residents were served only juice, tea, coffee, lemonade, or water without any dairy offered. Staff interviews indicated a lack of awareness regarding the requirement to serve milk with every meal.
The facility failed to ensure that 8 ounces of milk or equivalent dairy products were served three times daily to 14 of 23 residents in the Special Care Unit. Observations during meal service showed residents were served various beverages like juice, tea, and water, but milk or dairy alternatives were not provided to the identified residents.
The facility failed to ensure physician follow-up was completed for a resident who had orders to notify the primary care provider of weight gain of 3 pounds or greater in one day. Multiple instances of significant weight gain occurred between April and May 2023 without documentation that the physician was notified. This failure to follow medical orders resulted in the physician only learning of the resident's condition via a notification from a home health nurse.
The facility failed to ensure physician follow-up was completed for a resident who had an order for daily weights with specific parameters for notifying the doctor. Specifically, there was no documentation that the primary care provider was notified of multiple instances of weight gain exceeding 3 pounds within a single day during April and May 2023.
The facility failed to ensure physician notification and follow-up for several residents. Specifically, the facility did not notify the physician regarding a facial lesion and a dermatology referral for one resident, failed to follow up on an order for TED hose for another, and failed to follow up on an order for Vitamin B12 laboratory work for a third resident.
The facility failed to ensure physician notification and follow-up for several residents' health care needs. Specifically, staff failed to notify the physician regarding a facial lesion and a dermatology referral for one resident, failed to provide TED hoses for another, and failed to follow up on Vitamin B12 laboratory work for a third resident.
The facility failed to verify that one of six sampled staff members had no substantiated findings listed on the North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry prior to employment. A review of the employee's file showed no documentation that a registry check had been completed before they were hired.
The facility failed to ensure that one of six sampled staff members was tested for Tuberculosis (TB) disease upon employment. Documentation showed a previous test from 2016, but no evidence of a required TB skin test was provided for the staff member's start date at the facility.
The facility failed to ensure that one out of six sampled staff members was tested for Tuberculosis (TB) disease upon employment. Specifically, a contracted Medication Aide lacked documentation of a TB skin test administered at the time they began working at the facility on 2/14/17.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
9 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Westchester Manor at Providence Place
< 1 miNursing Home · High Point, NC
Meridian Center
1.6 miNursing Home · High Point, NC
Brookdale High Point
3.2 miAssisted Living · High Point, NC
Magnolia Gardens Center for Nursing and Rehabilita
4.1 miNursing Home · Thomasville, NC
Piedmont Christian Home
4.3 miAssisted Living · High Point, NC
Westwood Health and Rehabilitation
4.5 miNursing Home · Archdale, NC