Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm, family-oriented atmosphere. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 49 Google reviews
Email Piedmont Christian Home to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Piedmont Christian Home highly. Reviewers highlight: warm, family-oriented atmosphere, compassionate and attentive leadership. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families considering Piedmont Christian Home will find a community praised for its warm, family-oriented atmosphere and a dedicated leadership team that many believe has recently improved. However, there are serious, recurring allegations regarding hygiene issues, such as odors and pest concerns, as well as reports of missing personal belongings and inconsistent staffing responsiveness.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 32 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The folks at Piedmont Christian Home took great care of my mom Brenda from August 2021 to March 2025. My mom had severe dementia, and along with that came many health & care considerations. I found their staff to be caring and very communicative when there were any issues with my mom.”
“Our family loves having our love one at Piedmint Christian Home! The staff are thoughtful and caring. It is clean and organized. They tale good care of their residents and attend to their needs.”
“I would like to say thank you to the everyone who helped me and my family with the care of my father you all were wonderful keeping use up to date with his care, letting use know of changes and getting him the help he need in a timely manner.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to meet specific bedroom requirements regarding the physical environment. The regulation outlines standards for bedroom size, occupancy, ventilation, and window specifications to ensure resident safety and comfort.
The facility failed to maintain the physical environment requirements for resident bedrooms. Specifically, window restrictions were not properly implemented to ensure resident safety.
The facility failed to ensure that resident bedrooms were properly equipped with functional, operable windows. Specifically, there was a deficiency regarding the maintenance and functionality of window alarms in the special care unit.
The facility failed to ensure that window openings in the Special Care Unit (SCU) residents' bedrooms were restricted to 6 inches. Additionally, there were no workable sounding devices in place to notify staff when a resident's window was opened, creating a risk for elopement or suicide.
The facility failed to ensure window openings in the Special Care Unit (SCU) were restricted to 6 inches to prevent elopement or suicide. Observations revealed several windows could be opened up to 21 inches, and window alarms failed to sound in 12 out of 14 instances. Additionally, one window lacked a screen and the area outside the SCU was not properly secured from the adjacent wooded area.
The facility failed to meet the requirements for the physical environment regarding resident bedrooms. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to comply with specific bedroom standards set forth in the regulations.
The facility failed to ensure that one sampled medication aide had passed the required written medication aide exam within 60 days of completing their clinical skills validation checklist. Personnel records showed the staff member completed training and clinical skills in October 2022, but there was no documentation of a successful written exam within the mandated timeframe.
The facility failed to ensure that therapeutic diets were served as ordered by the resident's physician. Specifically, a resident prescribed a pureed diet was served non-pureed food, including identifiable pieces of macaroni and beef, during lunch on February 1, 2023.
The facility failed to ensure that one sampled medication aide had passed the required written medication aide exam within 60 days of completing their clinical skills competency validation. Documentation showed the staff member completed training in October 2022, but there was no evidence of a passed written exam by the required deadline.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
49 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Maryfield Nursing Home
< 1 miNursing Home · High Point, NC
The Shannon Gray Rehabilitation & Recovery Center
1.6 miNursing Home · Jamestown, NC
Bennett's Family Care Home #2
2.0 miAdult Family Home · Jamestown, NC
Meridian Center
2.7 miNursing Home · High Point, NC
Brookdale High Point North
3.1 miAssisted Living · High Point, NC
Brookdale Skeet Club
3.1 miAssisted Living · High Point, NC