Riverside Place
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and attentive staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 26 Google reviews

Watch Riverside Place
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
Riverside Place is highly regarded for its creative and compassionate approach to memory care, particularly in how they personalize daily routines for residents. However, families should clarify the facility's expectations for family involvement during resident transitions or behavioral episodes to ensure the communication style aligns with your needs.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
26 reviews on Google“Riverside Place is widely praised for its compassionate staff, clean environment, and engaging activities for residents, particularly in memory care. While families appreciate the facility's effort to create a homelike atmosphere, some have expressed frustration regarding frequent communication about resident behavioral issues that they feel should be managed internally by staff.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate and attentive staff
- Clean and well-maintained facility
- Active and engaging resident programming
- Supportive transition process for new residents
Concerns
- Excessive or inappropriate communication regarding resident behavioral issues (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 29 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
Questions for Your Tour
- 1With your active calendar of resident programming, what are some of the most popular activities that help new residents build friendships during their first few weeks?
- 2I noticed your team is very responsive to feedback online; how do you typically keep families updated on their loved one's daily well-being and adjustments?
- 3When a resident is going through a difficult transition or behavioral change, what is your approach to communicating with the family to ensure we are all working together as a support team?
- 4Given your smaller community size of 38 residents, how does your staff ensure that each person receives personalized, attentive care throughout the day?
- 5How do you handle medical needs or emergencies after hours to ensure residents remain safe and comfortable without needing to leave the facility?
- 6The facility is consistently praised for being well-maintained; what is your process for ensuring residents' living spaces stay clean and comfortable on a daily basis?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff made her a time clock so she simply thought she was going to work each day. It's the small details like this that make her days fulfilling.”
“Lewy body dementia is so very difficult but the caring staff at Riverside have done everything they can to make my mom feel loved and safe. They’re proactive in reaching out to me and always have time to give me an update.”
“My only complaint is the constant phone calls, even the first night my Brother-in-law moved in. After a very long day moving him from Tacoma, they want me to come sit with him because he's upset. Sorry, but thats your job now ($6,400 a month)”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
Mar 24, 2026Investigation
A follow-up inspection dated 05/19/2026 (referenced in the cover letter) indicates that the identified deficiencies related to WAC 388-78A-2371, 388-78A-2371-1, and 388-78A-2371-2 were corrected.
The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation and document findings after a resident sustained a serious injury (nose fracture and two black eyes) from an unwitnessed fall, leaving the possibility of physical abuse unruled out.
Sep 30, 2025Inspection17Report
The most recent follow-up inspection on 09/30/2025 found no deficiencies, confirming corrections for previous violations.; Several deficiencies are noted as uncorrected and previously cited on 01/23/2025.; Facility failed to provide care according to NSAs for R1 (hospice/pain medication changes), R2 (showers/hygiene/medication administration), and R3 (shower schedule). R4 was identified as an aggressor in multiple resident-to-resident altercations without adequate coordination of alternative placement.; Plan of correction dates are handwritten on the forms as 3-8-25.; Facility is a memory care unit with 22 residents.
Facility failed to provide agreed-upon care (showers and medication administration) as outlined in resident service plans.
Facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention practices.
Failed to follow facility fall policy (vital signs and post-fall assessment) for 1 resident following an unwitnessed fall.
Facility failed to ensure staff were trained, credentialed, and qualified to perform delegated tasks; also failed to ensure a nurse delegator verified staff credentials.
Failed to safely store hazardous supplies in 3 of 3 indoor locations; chemicals found in unlocked cabinets accessible to residents.
Facility failed to obtain prescribed medications in a timely manner for 4 of 5 sampled residents, placing them at risk of harm.
Facility failed to secure hazardous supplies (cleaning agents, personal care items) in resident-accessible areas, including the dining room, R1's room, and R3's room.
Facility lacked a certified food protection manager, one staff member lacked a valid WA food worker card, and refrigerator temperatures consistently exceeded safety thresholds.
Facility failed to ensure staff were individually delegated to perform specific nursing tasks for residents, placing them at risk for injury.
Facility failed to institute appropriate infection prevention practices; missing soap dispenser in hopper room, staff do not wash hands after handling soiled laundry.
Facility failed to ensure Negotiated Service Agreements (NSAs) were completed within 30 days for new admissions (R3) and failed to update NSAs for 4 of 6 sampled residents when their physical or mental condition changed or when the existing agreement no longer met their needs.
Facility failed to properly store hazardous supplies, placing residents at risk of injury due to ingesting hazardous ingredients.
Facility failed to complete 14-day assessments in a timely manner for R2 and R3.
Facility failed to provide care agreed upon in the service plan (NSA) for 3 of 5 sampled residents.
Facility failed to ensure 7 of 8 sampled staff obtained or maintained active Home Care Aide (HCA) certification. Staff with lapsed or missing credentials were actively providing care to residents.
Facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention practices (handwashing) in a memory care unit, posing a risk of spreading infectious diseases.
Facility failed to implement its fall policy for R6 after a fall, failing to perform required assessments and vitals checks.
Aug 1, 2025Enforcement$700.00Report
This is a recurring deficiency previously cited on January 23, 2025, and an uncorrected deficiency previously cited on April 1, 2025, and January 23, 2025. A civil fine of $700.00 was imposed.
The licensee failed to ensure staff were individually delegated to each resident's individual task, resulting in three residents receiving services from non-delegated, untrained staff.
Apr 1, 2025Enforcement$1,600.00Report
Letter serves as notice of imposition of civil fines totaling $1,600.00 for uncorrected and recurring deficiencies.
Failed to institute appropriate infection prevention practices to limit the spread of infectious illnesses in one memory care unit.
Failed to safely store supplies in three indoor locations in a memory care facility.
Failed to ensure staff were individually delegated to each resident's individual delegation task; delegated services provided by non-delegated staff.
Failed to provide care agreed upon in the service plan for two residents.
Failed to implement fall policy for one resident.
Jan 23, 2025Enforcement$200.00Report
This letter serves as a formal notice of a $200.00 civil fine. The deficiency was previously cited on March 28, 2023.
The licensee failed to provide care agreed upon in the service plan (negotiated service agreement [NSA]) for three residents.
Aug 28, 2024Investigation
The document explicitly states that the facility does not meet the Assisted Living Facility requirements and that no plan-of-correction is required to be submitted by the facility.
The facility failed to promptly notify the Complaint Resolution Unit (CRU) of 2 out of 2 reported and investigated incidents.
Jul 24, 2023Fire
The inspection on 04/13/2023 was 'Disapproved'. A follow-up inspection on 07/24/2023 confirmed all violations noted during previous inspections have been corrected, resulting in an 'Approved' status.
Facility failed to provide documentation showing annual inspection of fire-resistance-rated construction.
Facility failed to provide documentation showing annual fire door inspections; failed to maintain double doors by dining room (not closing).
Facility failed to provide documentation showing fire/smoke damper 4-year inspection.
Facility failed to provide documentation showing smoke detectors sensitivity test.
Facility failed to provide documentation showing annual backflow inspection; failed to maintain sprinkler head in front of kitchen hood (head recessed).
Mar 28, 2023Investigation
This was a recurring deficiency previously cited on 03/10/2021. The document is a packet containing a follow-up letter confirming no deficiencies as of 06/07/2023, and the original Statement of Deficiencies dated 03/28/2023.
Facility failed to provide agreed-upon incontinent care for 3 of 5 residents. Staff were aware residents were found soaked in urine but failed to take action.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
26 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit caringplaces.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Channel Point Village
1.4 miAssisted Living · Hoquiam, WA
Pacific Care and Rehabilitation
1.8 miNursing Home · Hoquiam, WA
Westhaven Villa
1.8 miAssisted Living · Aberdeen, WA
Grays Harbor Health & Rehabilitation Center
2.0 miNursing Home · Aberdeen, WA
Harbor Alternative Living Association
2.5 miSupported Living · Aberdeen, WA
Twin Harbors Group Home Associates
3.4 miSupported Living · Aberdeen, WA