See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Terrabella Hendersonville

Limited public data on Terrabella Hendersonville. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

3851 Howard Gap Road, Hendersonville, NC 2879296 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: NC DHSR — view official record
Google rating
3.8/5

based on 33 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Terrabella Hendersonville

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility has a proven track record of excellent care under strong leadership, but recent feedback suggests a decline in staffing levels. If you choose this facility, specifically ask about their current staffing ratios and how they ensure resident hygiene and activity schedules are maintained.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

33 reviews on Google
Families often praise the facility for its warm, welcoming atmosphere and the compassionate, professional nature of the leadership and staff. However, recent reviews raise serious concerns regarding inconsistent staffing levels, lack of resident activities, and lapses in basic care such as hygiene and monitoring.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
FoodN/AStaff7.0Clean8.0Activities3.0MedsN/AMemory9.0Comms5.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate and professional leadership
  • Warm and welcoming staff attitude
  • Clean and well-maintained environment
  • Strong commitment to continuous improvement

Concerns

  • Inconsistent staffing affecting resident care and hygiene (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Lack of scheduled resident activities and courtyard access (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Difficulty contacting facility after hours

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2344.62023(12)3.62024(5)3.52025(11)3.02026(2)

Distribution · 30 analyzed

5
21
4
1
3
0
2
1
1
7

How They Respond to Reviews

90%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is wonderful to see how much the leadership team engages with the community and responds to feedback; how does that commitment to continuous improvement shape the way you manage daily care?
  • 2We would love to hear more about the social side of living here—what does a typical weekly calendar of activities look like for the residents?
  • 3How do you ensure that the courtyard and outdoor spaces are easily accessible and integrated into the residents' daily routines?
  • 4Can you tell us about your staffing structure, specifically how you ensure consistent care and attention to hygiene needs during every shift?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency or if we need to reach someone urgently during the night, what is the protocol for contacting the on-call staff?
  • 6The facility looks incredibly clean and well-maintained; what kind of daily routines do you have in place to keep the environment looking this sharp?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff weren’t just friendly—they were warm, attentive, and clearly passionate about what they do. What stood out most to me was the atmosphere. It wasn’t just clean and organized—it had a sense of calm and care that instantly put me at ease.

Visitor · 2025★★★★★

The activities are never held and apparently haven’t been held for years due to low staff. Residents don’t have access to the courtyard because of low staff. They lost her hearing aids. They are almost impossible to contact after hours.

Family member · 2026☆☆☆☆

My sister has been here for 3 years and it is wonderful! Tanya Tingly who manages the MC unit is terrific. She is very professional, runs a tight ship and makes sure she and the staff take care of the patients so well.

Memory care family member · 2024★★★★★
Source: 33 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation

12total
13deficiencies
Apr 10, 2025Other
Personal Care and SupervisionD 269

The facility failed to provide required personal care assistance for a resident who needed help with showers. Although the resident's care plan and room schedule required showers twice weekly, the resident was only assisted once weekly, and documentation failed to show consistent care or recorded refusals.

Apr 10, 2025Other
Personal Care and SupervisionF255

The facility failed to provide required personal care assistance for a resident who needed help with showers. Specifically, Resident #8 did not receive a scheduled shower on 04/08/25, and there was a lack of documentation regarding shower assistance or refusals. Staff were unable to confirm if the resident was receiving the required twice-weekly showers as outlined in the care plan.

Mar 25, 2024Follow-up
Personal Care and SupervisionD 270

The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for two residents with a history of falls. No additional safety interventions were ordered or implemented to minimize the risk of future falls for these individuals.

Nov 1, 2023Complaint
Personal Care and SupervisionD 271

The facility failed to respond immediately to an incident involving a resident. Specifically, staff discovered Resident #4's bathroom door was locked and the resident could not be located, indicating a failure to provide necessary care and intervention per policy.

Nov 1, 2023Complaint
Personal Care and SupervisionTYPE A1

The facility failed to respond immediately to an incident involving a resident. Specifically, staff were unable to locate Resident #4 because their bathroom door was locked and the resident was missing from their expected location.

Sep 1, 2023Follow-up
Resident Care PlanD 263

The facility failed to ensure that 3 out of 6 sampled residents had an accurate care plan signed and dated by a physician within 15 days of the assessment completion. Specifically, for Resident #6, the care plan lacked the required physician signature despite documented changes in orientation and wandering behaviors.

Sep 1, 2023Follow-up
Care Plan/Service Plan DeficienciesD 263

The facility failed to ensure resident care plans were properly maintained and physician-signed. Specifically, Resident #6's care plans lacked physician signatures, and the facility used an unapproved 'Service Plan' in place of the required care plan. Additionally, staff relied on verbal communication rather than documented care plans to determine the level of assistance needed for activities of daily living.

Jan 12, 2022Follow-up
Medication AdministrationD 358

The facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one resident, specifically failing to provide metoprolol prescribed for elevated heart rate. This occurred because the facility did not obtain the necessary refill authorization from the resident's primary care physician, leading to an exhausted supply. Consequently, the resident missed multiple doses of the medication between January 8 and January 10, 2022.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Contact