See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Spring Arbor of Greensboro

Limited public data on Spring Arbor of Greensboro. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

5125 Michaux Road, Greensboro, NC 27410100 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: NC DHSR — view official record
Google rating
3.6/5

based on 33 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Spring Arbor of Greensboro

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility offers a beautiful environment and a staff that many families describe as truly caring and attentive. However, families should be cautious regarding high costs and should specifically verify the presence of on-site nursing and the current stability of the staff, as recent reviews highlight concerns with leadership and turnover.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

33 reviews on Google
Families often praise the facility for its warm, compassionate staff and its ability to make residents feel like family, particularly in memory care and hospice situations. However, significant concerns have been raised regarding high costs, leadership quality, and allegations of inadequate supervision and staffing turnover.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food9.0Staff8.0Clean9.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemory9.0Comms8.0Value2.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and attentive nursing staff
  • Beautiful and clean facility environment
  • Engaging activities and resident engagement
  • Strong support for families during transitions

Concerns

  • High cost of services compared to other providers
  • Inadequate supervision and failure to perform mandated checks
  • High staff turnover and understaffing (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'17(3)'19(1)'21(4)'23(5)'25(4)'26(3)

Distribution · 30 analyzed

5
17
4
3
3
1
2
0
1
9

How They Respond to Reviews

33%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard wonderful things about how compassionate and attentive the nursing staff is here; how do you ensure that level of care remains consistent during shift changes?
  • 2The facility looks beautiful and very clean; what is your routine for maintaining the common areas and resident rooms?
  • 3We are looking for a place with a vibrant social life—could you tell us more about the specific types of resident engagement activities you offer throughout the week?
  • 4How does the care team manage regular safety checks and monitoring for residents, especially during the overnight hours?
  • 5Since we are evaluating our budget, can you help us understand the full breakdown of costs and what specific services are included in the monthly rate?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency or a sudden change in health, what is the immediate protocol for notifying the family and coordinating care?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff were so attentive and served him and our family like their own family.

Memory care and hospice family member · 2026★★★★★

From nurses to housekeepers, mother often said she felt safe and cared about. Not just 'cared FOR', but staff truly cared ABOUT her, spending time with her and keeping me updated.

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★

The community is clean, well organized, and the residents always look happy. I am impressed with management knowledge and involvement with residents.

Nurse and former AL director · 2024★★★★★
Source: 33 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation

9total
17deficiencies
Nov 19, 2025Other
Physical EnvironmentD 067

The facility failed to ensure that exit doors accessible to residents in the Special Care Unit (SCU) and the Locked Unit had a continuous sounding device that is activated when the door is opened. Specifically, one door in the SCU did not alarm when opened, and staff did not consistently respond to or deactivate the alarms on other exit doors.

Nov 19, 2025Other
Physical EnvironmentD067

The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 4 exit doors in the Special Care Unit and 2 of 2 doors in the Assisted Living Locked Unit had continuous sounding devices that were responded to and deactivated by staff.

Housekeeping and FurnishingsD067

A wound cleanser was left unattended on a bathroom sink in the Memory Care unit.

Tuberculosis Test, Medical Exam & ImmunizationD067

The FL-2 form for a resident was not updated.

Health CareD067

The facility failed to obtain and document daily weights as ordered by the physician.

Nutrition and Food ServiceD067

The facility failed to protect food from contamination, as evidenced by unlabeled or undated food, mold growth, expired food, and debris on floors, stoves, and storage bins.

Nutrition and Food ServicesD067

The facility failed to ensure that mealtime table service in the Special Care Unit and the locked unit in Assisted Living included a complete place setting of a knife, fork, and spoon.

Nutrition and Food ServiceD067

The facility failed to maintain a current listing of residents with physician-ordered therapeutic diets to guide food service operations.

Feb 10, 2023Follow-up
Medication AdministrationD358

The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for one resident. Specifically, insulin was administered despite blood sugar levels being below the required threshold (FSBS < 100) on multiple occasions in December 2022 and January 2023. This error resulted in a significant hypoglycemic event on 01/12/23 where the resident's blood sugar dropped to 38, requiring EMS intervention and hospitalization.

Feb 10, 2023Follow-up
Medication AdministrationD 358

The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for one resident. Specifically, insulin was administered at 6:00 PM on multiple dates in December 2022 and January 2023 despite blood sugar levels being below the required threshold of 100 mg/dL, which should have triggered a hold on the medication.

Jan 27, 2020Complaint
Personal Care and SupervisionD 270

The facility failed to provide supervision according to residents' needs and current symptoms for several residents. Specific failures included inadequate monitoring for residents exhibiting exit-seeking behaviors, elopement, and those at high risk for falls, as well as failure to address inappropriate physical contact between residents.

Resident RightsD 338

The facility failed to ensure that the rights of all residents are maintained and exercised without hindrance. This required staff re-education on timely communication of resident concerns to management and the importance of respecting resident dignity.

Declaration of Residents RightsD 914

The facility failed to ensure every resident is free of mental and physical abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Staff required re-education to understand their responsibility in reporting concerns to management and providers to ensure a safe environment.

Jan 27, 2020Complaint
Personal Care and SupervisionD 270

The facility failed to provide supervision in accordance with residents' assessed needs and care plans. Specifically, three residents were identified as lacking proper supervision, including instances of elopement, exit-seeking behaviors, multiple falls resulting in injuries, and inappropriate physical contact with other residents.

Jan 23, 2018Other
Nutrition And Food ServiceD 299

The facility failed to serve eight ounces of pasteurized milk to residents at least twice daily. During lunch and dinner observations in the locked unit, residents were served water, tea, or juice instead of milk. Additionally, milk was not provided to residents in a timely manner to assist with hydration during meal service.

Jan 23, 2018Other
Nutrition And Food ServiceD299

The facility failed to serve eight ounces of pasteurized milk to residents at least twice daily. During meal observations on January 16, 2018, residents were served tea, water, or juice instead of milk, and staff did not consistently offer the required milk service during breakfast or lunch.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Contact