Ridge Pinehurst LLC
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight beautiful, modern, resort-like facility. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 89 Google reviews

Watch Ridge Pinehurst LLC
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
The Ridge Pinehurst offers a beautiful, resort-like environment with excellent social activities, making it an attractive option for independent living. However, families should be cautious regarding assisted living and memory care; specifically, ask for concrete details on staff-to-resident ratios and how medication management is audited, as these are recurring points of failure in recent reviews.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
89 reviews on Google“The Ridge Pinehurst is a visually stunning, resort-style facility that many families praise for its modern amenities, active social calendar, and welcoming atmosphere. However, significant concerns exist regarding inconsistent dining service, high staff turnover, and occasional lapses in care quality, particularly in the assisted living and memory care units.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Beautiful, modern, resort-like facility
- Engaging activities and social programs
- Helpful and professional sales/move-in staff
- Well-maintained grounds and common areas
Concerns
- Inconsistent or poor dining service (long wait times, lost orders, cold food) (mentioned by 7 reviewers)
- Understaffing leading to delayed care or lack of responsiveness (mentioned by 5 reviewers)
- Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from management (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
- Medication management and distribution errors (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 78 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1The facility looks beautiful and modern; what specific social programs or outings are currently most popular with the residents here?
- 2I noticed the management team is very active in communicating with the community online; how do you typically handle day-to-day communication with families regarding a resident's well-being?
- 3What steps are in place to ensure that meal service is consistent, timely, and that food arrives at the proper temperature for every resident?
- 4Could you walk me through your specific protocols for medication administration and how you double-check for accuracy?
- 5In the event of a medical emergency or a sudden change in health during the night, what is the immediate response plan for the residents?
- 6With a community of this size, how do you ensure that staff members are always responsive and available to assist residents as soon as they need help?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The care here is just awful. I’ve heard from many staff that there are too many residents to care for and one person can be responsible for an entire floor or two.”
“The food is mostly bland and mostly reheated and out of a box. Food service is painfully slow; dinner is a 90 min commitment.”
“Occasionally there are issues and concerns to address, which can be difficult with an elderly parent. However, I have been incredibly impressed with how the Ridge has resolved them.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
Mar 3, 2026Complaint
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO41620 was completed on 3/3/26. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to either directly or indirectly through a resident agreement provide protective oversight, affecting one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference U1150)Specifically, Former Resident #5 had assistance by Staff #5 to use the restroom in the memory care unit on 1/26/27 at around 8:00 p.m. When Staff #5 assisted the former resident, the staff member had turned her back to replace the toilet paper while the former resident was on the toilet and during that time, the former resident fell face first off the toilet. This fall resulted in an injury near the eye and an injured jaw. The former resident required two staff to assist her with toileting and transferring, however, one staff member had transferred her and the resident fell. Emergency services were not called or contacted. The resident passed away four days later. Findings include:Former Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 8/7/22, with diagnoses including dementia and Alzheimer ' s.1. Record ReviewA care plan, dated 3/16/23, did not mention the resident required a two person transfer or two person toileting assistant.A policy titled Fall Reduction and Management dated January 2022 read in part" The resident will have a service plan implemented with an individualized approach."An incident report dated 1/26/26 at 8:11 p.m. rea.. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure each care plan detailed specific personal service needs along with the staff tasks necessary to meet those needs, affecting one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference U1110)Findings include:Former Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 8/7/22 with a diagnosis including dementia, Alzheimer ' s disease, and major depressive disorder.Record Review:A care plan dated 3/16/23 and 1/29/26 read in part "I often need 2 person assistance for dressing and showers and invite, escort me to all activities of interest and if able." However, the care plan did not mention she required two person transfer and toileting assistance.A policy titled Fall Reduction and Management dated 1/22 was reviewed on 3/3/26 read in part"The assisted living director or designee will investigate the fall with the intention of reducing the incident of falls for the person who fell. Changes to the service plans will be made, as needed." An assessment dated 10/30/25 and 1/27/26 read in part the resident required stand by assistance for transfers and she required the assistance of one staff member for transfers. Interviews:On 3/3/26 at 10:39 a.m., an interview was conducted with the power of attorney for former resident #5. The power of attorney stated that before former resident #5 had a fall on 1/26/26, ..
Dec 16, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Dec 16, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Dec 16, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Dec 16, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Jan 6, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Jan 6, 2025Complaint
A relicensure survey with complaint #CO37064 and #CO36396 was completed on 1/7/25. A deficiency was cited. Based on record review, interviews, and observations the residence failed to detail in each resident ' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risks, affecting two of six sample residents (#44, #50). Specifically, Resident #50 was admitted to the residence on 5/9/23 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, osteoarthritis and anemia. The resident fell six times between 10/14 and 12/31/24. Five of these falls resulted in injuries such as bruises, knee pain, head injury, pain in the back, legs, knees and hips, and a skin tear. There were care plans dated 6/1/24, 11/13/24 and 1/2/25, however, the care plans were not updated after falls with individualized approaches necessary to address all the falls the resident experienced. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe Residence Fall Reduction and Management policy, undated, read: "Reduction of falls is the responsibility of all associates. The assisted living director or designee will investigate the fall with the intention of reducing the incidents of falls for the person who fell. Changes to service plans will be made, as needed." 2. Resident #50 was admitted to the residence on 5/9/23 with diagnoses of muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, and anemia. a. Record ReviewA residence care plan with fall interventions, revised 6/1/24, read that Resident #50 was not able to ambulate long distances without guidance, used her walker for ambulation, and was independent with ambulation. The care plan read that Resident #50 was educated to lock her brakes on her wheelchair, wear gripper socks, ensure her walker was close by, and call for assistance with the bathroom during the night. The care plan, revised 6/1/24, read that Resident #50 lived with moderate dementia and moderate disorientation with difficulty recalling information. A progress note, dated 10/14/24 read that Resident #50 was "sitting up on her bottom leaning up against her recliner in her living room. Resident (#50) had no shoes on and no socks. Noticed there was a tiny skin tear the size of a grain of rice on R..
Jan 6, 2025Complaint
A complaint revisit was completed on 1/7/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 6/21/23. Deficiencies were cited. Based on record review, interviews, and observations the residence failed to detail in each resident' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risks, affecting two of six sample residents (#44, #50). This deficiency was cited previously during a complaint revisit on 6/21/23. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Specifically, Resident #50 was admitted to the residence on 5/9/23 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, osteoarthritis and anemia. The resident fell six times between 10/14 and 12/31/24. Five of these falls resulted in injuries such as bruises, knee pain, head injury, pain in the back, legs, knees and hips, and a skin tear. There were care plans dated 6/1/24, 11/13/24 and 1/2/25, however, the care plans were not updated after falls with individualized approaches necessary to address all the falls the resident experienced. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe Residence Fall Reduction and Management policy, undated, read: "Reduction of falls is the responsibility of all associates. The assisted living director or designee will investigate the fall with the intention of reducing the incidents of falls for the person who fell. Changes to service plans will be made, as needed." 2. Resident #50 .. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
89 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit theridgeseniorliving.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Lakewood Littleton Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Lakewood, CO
Manor on Marston Lake LLC, the
< 1 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Tendercare at Pinehurst LLC
1.3 miAssisted Living · Denver, CO
Sunrise at Pinehurst
1.4 miAssisted Living · Denver, CO
Green Meadows Assisted Living LLC
2.7 miAssisted Living · Denver, CO
Jewell Place Rtf
3.2 miAssisted Living · Lakewood, CO