Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention beautiful, modern, resort-like facility. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 91 Google reviews

Email Ridge Pinehurst LLC to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Ridge Pinehurst LLC highly. Reviewers highlight: beautiful, modern, resort-like facility, engaging activities and social programs. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
The Ridge Pinehurst is a visually stunning, resort-style facility that many families praise for its modern amenities, active social calendar, and welcoming atmosphere. However, significant concerns exist regarding inconsistent dining service, high staff turnover, and occasional lapses in care quality, particularly in the assisted living and memory care units.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 80 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The care here is just awful. I’ve heard from many staff that there are too many residents to care for and one person can be responsible for an entire floor or two.”
“The food is mostly bland and mostly reheated and out of a box. Food service is painfully slow; dinner is a 90 min commitment.”
“As a new resident, there is no orientation program, so I am left to run back and forth between multiple staff trying to clarify how The Ridge processes work. Very inefficient.”
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO41620 was completed on 3/3/26. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to either directly or indirectly through a resident agreement provide protective oversight, affecting one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference U1150)Specifically, Former Resident #5 had assistance by Staff #5 to use the restroom in the memory care unit on 1/26/27 at around 8:00 p.m. When Staff #5 assisted the former resident, the staff member had turned her back to replace the toilet paper while the former resident was on the toilet and during that time, the former resident fell face first off the toilet. This fall resulted in an injury near the eye and an injured jaw. The former resident required two staff to assist her with toileting and transferring, however, one staff member had transferred her and the resident fell. Emergency services were not called or contacted. The resident passed away four days later. Findings include:Former Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 8/7/22, with diagnoses including dementia and Alzheimer ' s.1. Record ReviewA care plan, dated 3/16/23, did not mention the resident required a two person transfer or two person toileting assistant.A policy titled Fall Reduction and Management dated January 2022 read in part" The resident will have a service plan implemented with an individualized approach."An incident report dated 1/26/26 at 8:11 p.m. rea.. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure each care plan detailed specific personal service needs along with the staff tasks necessary to meet those needs, affecting one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference U1110)Findings include:Former Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 8/7/22 with a diagnosis including dementia, Alzheimer ' s disease, and major depressive disorder.Record Review:A care plan dated 3/16/23 and 1/29/26 read in part "I often need 2 person assistance for dressing and showers and invite, escort me to all activities of interest and if able." However, the care plan did not mention she required two person transfer and toileting assistance.A policy titled Fall Reduction and Management dated 1/22 was reviewed on 3/3/26 read in part"The assisted living director or designee will investigate the fall with the intention of reducing the incident of falls for the person who fell. Changes to the service plans will be made, as needed." An assessment dated 10/30/25 and 1/27/26 read in part the resident required stand by assistance for transfers and she required the assistance of one staff member for transfers. Interviews:On 3/3/26 at 10:39 a.m., an interview was conducted with the power of attorney for former resident #5. The power of attorney stated that before former resident #5 had a fall on 1/26/26, ..
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A complaint revisit was completed on 1/7/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 6/21/23. Deficiencies were cited. Based on record review, interviews, and observations the residence failed to detail in each resident' s care plan the individualized approach necessary to address fall risks, affecting two of six sample residents (#44, #50). This deficiency was cited previously during a complaint revisit on 6/21/23. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Specifically, Resident #50 was admitted to the residence on 5/9/23 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, osteoarthritis and anemia. The resident fell six times between 10/14 and 12/31/24. Five of these falls resulted in injuries such as bruises, knee pain, head injury, pain in the back, legs, knees and hips, and a skin tear. There were care plans dated 6/1/24, 11/13/24 and 1/2/25, however, the care plans were not updated after falls with individualized approaches necessary to address all the falls the resident experienced. Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe Residence Fall Reduction and Management policy, undated, read: "Reduction of falls is the responsibility of all associates. The assisted living director or designee will investigate the fall with the intention of reducing the incidents of falls for the person who fell. Changes to service plans will be made, as needed." 2. Resident #50 .. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
91 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit theridgeseniorliving.com
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Gardens Care Homes - Pinehurst, the
< 1 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Rocky Mountain Assisted Living Quincy Avenue Memory Care Facilities
< 1 miAssisted Living · Lakewood, CO
Lakewood Littleton Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Lakewood, CO
Manor on Marston Lake LLC, the
< 1 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Manor on Marston Lake-2, the
< 1 miAssisted Living · Littleton, CO
Learning Services Bear Creek
1.0 miAssisted Living · Lakewood, CO