Pleasant Ville Assisted Living Home LLC
Limited public data available for this facility. Call to verify details directly.
Watch Pleasant Ville Assisted Living Home LLC
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Nearby Alternatives To Compare
Compare this facility with at least one nearby backup option.
When public data is thin, nearby alternatives give you better context on pricing, reviews, and how much information is publicly available in the same market.
Mesa Serenity Assisted Living Home LLC
2.8 miAssisted Living · Mesa, AZ
Citadel Post Acute
3.6 miNursing Home · Mesa, AZ
Country Grove LLC
4.1 miAssisted Living · Mesa, AZ
Citrus Villa Mesa Assisted Living, LLC
5.1 miAssisted Living · Mesa, AZ
Metropolitan Assisted Living LLC
6.7 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
Gifts of Grace Assisted Living Homes
6.7 miAssisted Living · Gilbert, AZ
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Nov 28, 2025Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint 0015184 conducted on November 28, 2025:
Based on record review and interview, the assisted living home failed to maintain written documentation of emergency responder (EMS) information that included the items listed in Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 36-420.04(A)(1-9) for four of four residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the emergency responder was not aware of critical health information for the resident. Findings include: 1. A review of R1, R2, R3 and R4’s medical records revealed a standardized form that did not include the following: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy; The name and contact information for the resident's primary care physician; The point-of-contact information for the assisted living center or assisted living home; and A copy of the resident's health insurance portability and accountability act release authorizing a receiving hospital to communicate with the assisted living home to plan for the resident's discharge. 2. In an exit interview, findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an assisted living facility authorized to provide directed care services provided access to an outside area that monitored or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. Documentation review revealed that the facility was licensed at the directed care level. 2. During an environmental inspection, the Compliance Officer observed sliding doors located in two separate residents' rooms of the facility. Each room was assigned as a private room. The doors did not have an egress alert or a monitoring system. Each door provided access to the patio and backyard. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were discussed with E1, and no further information was provided.
Nov 14, 2024OtherCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the off-site modification for room occupancy from 5 beds to 10 beds completed on November 14, 2024.
Dec 20, 2023Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on December 20, 2023:
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure an individual submitted documentation dated within 90 calendar days before the individual was accepted by the facility including whether the individual required restraints for two of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed a document titled "Admission Orders." This document was signed by a medical practitioner within 90 calendar days before admission and stated each resident did not require continuous medical services or continuous nursing services. However, the document did not state whether each resident required restraints. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the admissions form provided by the facility for R1 and for R2 did not include the required verbiage stating whether the resident required restraints.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure the hot water temperature was maintained between 95 \'b0F and 120 \'b0F in areas of the assisted living facility used by residents. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed the hot water temperature measured at 124.5\'b0 F in a shared bathroom. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged the hot water temperature had not been maintained between 95 \'b0F and 120 \'b0F in areas of the assisted living facility used by residents.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.