New Hanover House
Limited public data on New Hanover House. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 17 Google reviews
Watch New Hanover House
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
The facility appears to be in a period of improvement with a new leadership team and cleaner environments. However, families should closely monitor nutritional intake and ensure that medical equipment is safely positioned, as recent concerns regarding weight loss and oxygen tank placement were noted.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
17 reviews on Google“New Hanover House is praised by many for its friendly, attentive staff and a recent positive shift in leadership and facility cleanliness. However, a recent review highlights serious concerns regarding significant weight loss in a resident and potential issues with food quality and equipment safety.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Friendly and attentive staff
- Clean and inviting facility
- Capable of handling medical and cognitive needs
- New leadership team
Concerns
- Potential issues with food quality/nutrition
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 17 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility responds to some reviews.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1I noticed the facility feels very clean and inviting; what specific steps does your housekeeping team take to maintain that standard for the residents?
- 2With the new leadership team in place, what are some of the biggest positive changes you've seen in the daily operations here?
- 3How does the staff approach personalized care for residents who have specific medical or cognitive needs?
- 4What does a typical daily menu look like, and how do you ensure nutritional variety and quality for every meal?
- 5How does the communication process work between the facility and families, especially regarding updates on a resident's well-being?
- 6In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the protocol for notifying the family and coordinating care?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“After reading some of the older reviews, I had my hesitations regarding the facility and staff. However, it is evident there have been many positive changes! The facility is clean, inviting, and well cared for. The staff is also excellent!”
“Can handle both medical and cognitive issues. Finally feel comfortable leaving my son in the care of a nursing home.Overall good care and good staff.”
“My 95 yrs old and 90percent blind godmother has been there a month or so. At least the place smells better than most. BUT... her oxygen tank was very hot to touch because it was placed too close between the bed and wall 😞”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
Jan 12, 2026Complaint
The facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards in the Special Care Unit (SCU). Specifically, personal care items were found in a resident's room, and tools, paint, and chemicals were left in the maintenance director's office in an unlocked and unsupervised area accessible to residents.
Jan 12, 2026Complaint
The facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards. Specifically, personal care items, tools, paint, and chemicals were found in the maintenance director's office in the Special Care Unit, which was left unlocked and accessible to residents.
Oct 3, 2025Complaint
The facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards in the Special Care Unit (SCU). Specifically, a shower room door was left unlocked and open, exposing resident products and a bottle of lotion with ingestion warnings to all residents.
Oct 3, 2025Complaint
The facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards on the Special Care Unit (SCU). Specifically, personal care items were found accessible to residents, creating a potential ingestion risk.
Sep 10, 2025Complaint
The facility failed to ensure that three out of five sampled medication aides had proper employment verification or the required state-approved 5-hour, 10-hour, or 15-hour medication administration training documentation. Specifically, staff members were found to have completed online training without the required in-person instructor component or lacked the necessary certificates of completion.
Sep 10, 2025Complaint
The facility failed to ensure that medication aide personnel files contained the required 5, 10, or 15-hour training certificates. Some staff members were found to be working without documented proof of required training.
The facility failed to maintain up-to-date tuberculosis (TB) testing results in personnel files. Audit findings indicated that certain staff members were out of compliance with testing requirements.
The facility failed to ensure that all Assisted Living resident assessments were completed. A chart audit revealed that some resident assessments were missing or not properly documented in the Electronic Health Record.
The facility failed to properly document health care referrals and follow-up notifications to Primary Care Physicians (PCP). There was a lack of emphasis on documenting that residents' routine and acute health care needs were being communicated to their doctors.
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered and that the order processing system and documentation were accurate. Issues were identified regarding the consistency of medication administration records (MAR) and the effectiveness of medication cart audits.
Staff members were not consistently adhering to the six rights of medication administration. Re-education was required for Medication Aides, RCC, SCC, and the ED to ensure accuracy in medication delivery.
Oct 23, 2024Follow-up
The facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards by allowing personal care products to be accessible to residents in the Special Care Unit. Specifically, various hygiene products, including body wash, soap, and lotions, were found in resident rooms, bathrooms, and showers.
Oct 23, 2024Follow-up
The facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards, specifically leaving personal care hygiene products accessible to residents in the Special Care Unit. Observations identified items such as body wash, soap, moisturizer, and lotion left in resident rooms, showers, and on dressers.
The facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents was tested for tuberculosis disease upon admission in compliance with required control measures. Documentation for Resident #4 showed a TB skin test was administered after their admission date.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
17 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Azalea Health & Rehab Center
1.0 miNursing Home · Wilmington, NC
Morningside of Wilmington
1.9 miAssisted Living · Wilmington, NC
August Healthcare at Wilmington
2.0 miNursing Home · Wilmington, NC
Peak Resources-Wilmington, INC
2.2 miNursing Home · Wilmington, NC
Cedar Cove Assisted Living
2.2 miAssisted Living · Wilmington, NC
Spring Arbor of Wilmington
2.2 miAssisted Living · Wilmington, NC