Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention engaging activities and social events. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 85 Google reviews
Email Merrywood on Park to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Merrywood on Park highly. Reviewers highlight: engaging activities and social events, friendly and professional staff. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families generally praise the facility for its vibrant activities calendar, beautiful building, and a warm, welcoming atmosphere created by the staff and residents. However, there are significant concerns regarding communication and management, specifically regarding the building director's responsiveness and transparency regarding rates.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 34 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The dining room is lovely. They have theme dinners and parties, musical performances, movie nights, group outtings,meditations, and exercise classes. It’s like living at a resort!”
“We visited my father-in-law today and what a lovely place. He moved out from Los Angeles so Merrywood on Park had serious standards to live up to - and boy did they deliver. It’s so clean and welcoming from the front entrance and throughout.”
“The majority of the staff are wonderful and I believe have good intentions. The community itself is beautiful. Unfortunately for our family, I do not feel like those sentiments translate to the director.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure a yearly assessment was completed for one of three sampled residents. Specifically, the resident's functional assessment (FL2) had not been updated since August 2023, making it overdue by more than a year.
The facility failed to ensure quarterly licensed health professional support (LHPS) evaluations were completed by an appropriate licensed professional. For one sampled resident requiring LHPS tasks, the required quarterly reviews were not documented as completed.
The facility failed to ensure a yearly functional assessment was completed for one of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3's assessment was not updated by the required anniversary of their admission date.
The facility failed to ensure that 3 out of 4 sampled staff members had no substantiated findings listed on the North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry prior to being hired. Specifically, documentation of a registry check was missing for one staff member's pre-hire process.
The facility failed to ensure that 3 out of 4 sampled staff members had a North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry (HCPR) check completed prior to their date of hire. Documentation was missing for an independent living concierge and two medication aides, although subsequent checks were performed later.
Medication Technicians failed to follow specific parameters for administering medications used to treat hypertension. Specifically, medications including Benazepril HCL and Metoprolol Succinate ER were administered to a resident despite blood pressure and heart rate readings falling below the prescribed hold thresholds.
The facility failed to administer medications as ordered by a licensed prescribing practitioner for one resident. Specifically, staff administered Benazepril HCL and Metoprolol Succinate despite blood pressure and heart rate readings that met the 'hold' criteria specified in the physician's orders.
The facility failed to ensure that all current orders for medications or treatments were reviewed and signed by the resident's physician or prescribing practitioner at least every six months. Specifically, for one resident, several medications on hand for self-administration, including Levofloxacin, Lorazepam, Tramadol, Norco, and Clonazepam, lacked corresponding physician orders.
The facility failed to ensure that 3 out of 3 sampled Medication Aides hired after 10/1/13 had successfully completed the required 15-hour medication administration training program. Specifically, records for Staff A showed no documentation of completion for the 5-hour, 10-hour, or 15-hour training programs or employment verification.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
85 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Summit Place of Southpark
1.4 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Brookdale South Park
1.8 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Brighton Gardens of Charlotte
2.3 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Charter Senior Living of Charlotte
2.4 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Briar Creek Health Center
2.5 miNursing Home · Charlotte, NC
Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center-Snu
2.6 miNursing Home · Charlotte, NC