See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Brighton Gardens of Charlotte

Limited public data on Brighton Gardens of Charlotte. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

6000 Park South Drive, Closeburn - Glenkirk · Charlotte, NC 28210125 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: NC DHSR — view official record
Google rating
3.9/5

based on 46 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Brighton Gardens of Charlotte

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility offers a warm, professional onboarding experience and a clean environment that many families find comforting. However, you must investigate the recent reports of severe understaffing and neglect, specifically asking how they ensure consistent assistance with hygiene and daily needs during night and weekend shifts.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

46 reviews analyzed
Families often praise the facility for its compassionate, family-like care and the professionalism of the sales and administrative staff. However, there are serious, recurring allegations regarding chronic understaffing, which some reviewers claim leads to neglected hygiene and slow response times for daily needs.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food5.0Staff6.0Clean8.0Activities2.0Meds4.0Memory5.0Comms6.0Value7.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and professional care staff
  • Welcoming and knowledgeable sales/onboarding team
  • Clean and well-maintained facilities
  • Convenient and easy-to-navigate location

Concerns

  • Chronic understaffing leading to neglected resident care (mentioned by 3 reviewers)
  • Inconsistent dining service and long wait times (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Communication lapses regarding medication or care updates (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2344.32022(7)4.62023(9)4.02024(7)3.72025(6)1.02026(1)

Distribution

5
20
4
3
3
1
2
1
1
5

How They Respond to Reviews

100%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is so wonderful to see how much care the management team puts into responding to every piece of feedback; how does that culture of responsiveness translate to the daily care your residents receive?
  • 2We want to make sure our loved one stays active and engaged; could you walk us through the monthly calendar and how you ensure residents are participating in meaningful events?
  • 3Regarding medication management, what specific protocols and checks are in place to ensure every dose is administered accurately and on time?
  • 4How do you ensure that the care team has enough support during busy shifts so that every resident's individual needs and requests are met promptly?
  • 5What is the process for communicating important updates to families, especially regarding changes in a resident's medication or daily care routine?
  • 6We noticed the dining area is very well-maintained; how do you manage the meal service flow to ensure residents receive their food at the right time and temperature?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff is very caring. They treat my Mother like family. We are very happy with our decision to move to Brighton Gatdens.

Long-term resident's family · 2024★★★★★

One of my parents went unbathed for nearly two weeks. Their staff was regularly unable to assist with daily needs such as teeth brushing, bathing, transfers, eating assistance or general support requests.

Long-term resident's family · 2025☆☆☆☆

In the short amount of time he lived there the staff really got to know him so well and treated him so kindly.

Memory care family member · 2025★★★★★
Source: 46 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation

11total
11deficiencies
Oct 24, 2024Follow-up
Health CareD 2731

The facility failed to ensure proper referral and follow-up to meet the health care needs of residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure follow-up with a physician for two residents, including one resident who missed sliding scale insulin (SSI) for nine days and another resident who required physical, occupational, and speech therapy following a fall but did not receive the necessary evaluations or follow-up documentation.

Oct 24, 2024Follow-up
Health CareD 273

The facility failed to ensure necessary medical follow-up and referrals for residents. Specifically, one resident missed sliding scale insulin (SSI) doses for 9 days, and another resident did not receive the required follow-up evaluations for physical, occupational, or speech therapy following a fall.

Jun 27, 2024Other
Health CareD 273

The facility failed to ensure proper physician referral and follow-up for a resident with significantly high blood sugar readings. Specifically, for one resident, finger stick blood sugars were greater than 401 on 9 out of 17 occasions without documented follow-up. Additionally, the facility could not provide a policy for managing diabetic hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

Jun 27, 2024Other
Health CareTYPE A1 VIOLATION

The facility failed to ensure proper referral and follow-up with a physician for a resident with high blood sugar levels. Specifically, for one resident, there was no documentation that the Primary Care Provider was notified during multiple instances of hyperglycemia (FSBS > 401). Additionally, the facility could not provide a policy or procedure for managing diabetic residents with hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

Jul 19, 2019Other
Health CareC-tag not explicitly provided in text

The facility failed to ensure physician orders for continuous oxygen therapy were implemented for a resident. Specifically, the resident was observed without oxygen during transport, and staff were unaware of the continuous 3L order because it did not populate on the electronic medication administration records (eMAR).

Jan 12, 2018Other
Nutrition and Food Service: Therapeutic Diets10A NCAC 13F .0904(e)(4)

The facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were served as ordered for three residents requiring mechanical soft and consistent carbohydrate diets. Specifically, Resident #11 was served non-compliant items including a fried egg roll with a hard crust, unpureed vegetable beef soup, and dry crackers. The Dining Services Coordinator admitted that facility-created entrees were not reviewed by a Registered Dietitian for appropriateness.

Jan 12, 2018Other
Nutrition and Food ServiceD 310

The facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were served as ordered for 3 of 4 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #11, who was prescribed a No Added Salt (NAS) mechanical soft diet, was served items including a hard-crust egg roll, unpureed vegetable beef soup, and dry crackers.

Sep 23, 2015Complaint
Personal Care and SupervisionD 270

The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents in the special care unit, resulting in two residents eloping from the unit and the facility. The main exit door was found to be unlocked due to a 10-second delay in the locking mechanism and a door that would disengage if residents continuously banged on it.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Contact