Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm, compassionate care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 23 Google reviews

Email Cogir of Bothell to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Cogir of Bothell highly. Reviewers highlight: warm, compassionate care staff, effective transition support for memory care. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Cogir of Bothell receives high praise for its warm, attentive staff and effective memory care support, with many families noting significant improvements in their loved ones' well-being after moving in. However, the facility faces a serious, critical allegation regarding medical neglect and poor communication concerning a resident's severe foot infection. Families considering this facility should weigh the consistent reports of compassionate daily care against the need for vigilant oversight of medical health.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 26 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“We had looked at multiple places but found that Jennifer was the most professional from tour to move in. She answered questions we didn’t even know we would have! The care staff is great and you can tell they really care about the residents.”
“My mother was there 19 months. I was great in the beginning. Last month I visited and she had gotten an infection on her feet. They treated it with neosporin. My mom only knew that it hurt. I'm glad I found it. I took her to ER and ER said she had gangrene and cellulitis.”
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
Approval status was Disapproved. The inspection report also lists several items as corrected, including combustible storage in means of egress, general electrical compliance, relocatable power taps, extension cords, opening protective maintenance, sprinkler testing, wet-chemical systems, portable fire extinguishers, carbon monoxide detection, exit signs, and monthly emergency-light activation testing. Next inspection scheduled on or after 2026-08-07.
The facility could not produce fire drill records that included activation of the fire alarm system.
The facility could not produce documentation of the required 90-minute annual battery test for emergency lights and exit signs.
Items were stored within the required 36-inch clearance in front of electrical panels in the electrical room by the staff lounge.
The facility could not provide documentation showing correction of damper deficiencies identified in the April 2024 report for FD-1-A-3, FD-1-D-3, FD-1-D-10, FD-1-K-4, and FD-1-L-.
The April 30, 2025 fire alarm report listed deficiencies without documentation of correction: the second-floor dialer battery failed and the first-floor NAC panel next to the FACP failed.
The facility could not produce a fire safety plan.
Kitchen gas-fed appliances were not tethered to the wall.
There are multiple documents included; the primary report details three specific WAC violations. A separate follow-up letter indicates these specific deficiencies were corrected by 12/23/2025.
Facility failed to protect confidential resident information. A resident identifier list was found in a public binder, and staff sent confidential records to an unauthorized email recipient.
Facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 staff members completed required TB testing within three days of employment.
Facility employed staff (Staff C) who had a disqualifying crime on their background check without proper documentation of clearance, allowing them to provide unsupervised care.
A follow-up inspection on 11/06/2025 confirmed that the deficiency was corrected.
The facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sampled staff (Medication Technician) maintained a current CPR certification, which had expired in July 2025.
There are multiple documents including a follow-up letter from 06/18/2024 stating no deficiencies, but the primary data is extracted from the 04/24/2024 Statement of Deficiencies.; This document is a follow-up letter from Residential Care Services referencing a consultation deficiency. It notes that the facility is not required to submit a plan of correction for this specific consultation deficiency.
Facility failed to document responsibilities of hospice provider in the NSA for one resident and failed to document interventions/risk monitoring for a medication (Eliquis) for another resident.
Facility failed to perform ongoing assessment for a resident's new skin issue and change to diet order, putting them at risk for complications.
The facility failed to post a copy of the most recent full inspection report and plan of correction in a conspicuous place.
Facility failed to properly label/date food, had expired food, and allowed a resident without a food handler's permit to access/handle items in the kitchen.
Includes complaint numbers 103969, 105538, and 106495. Investigation into fall/alleged abuse (intake 106495) noted staff was terminated. Facility not required to submit a plan-of-correction.
The facility failed to implement their COVID-19 policy, which states all staff should wear a mask while in the community during an outbreak, leading to a risk of exposure.
Previous inspection on 02/13/2023 resulted in a disapproval; all violations noted during previous inspections have been corrected as of 04/06/2023.
Facility is unable to provide documentation for the required smoke detector sensitivity testing.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
23 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit cogirusa.com
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Vineyard Park at Bothell Landing
< 1 miAssisted Living · Bothell, WA
Riverside East
< 1 miAssisted Living · Bothell, WA
Chateau at Bothell Landing Retirement Community
< 1 miAssisted Living · Bothell, WA
Alpha Supported Living Services
1.4 miSupported Living · Seattle, WA
Alpha Supported Living Services South Branch (king)
1.4 miSupported Living · Bothell, WA
Alpha Supported Living Services (spokane)
1.4 miSupported Living · Bothell, WA