Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm and welcoming atmosphere. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 19 Google reviews
Email Brookdale Weddington Park to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Brookdale Weddington Park highly. Reviewers highlight: warm and welcoming atmosphere, compassionate and attentive care staff. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families generally praise Brookdale Weddington Park for its warm, home-like atmosphere and a staff that goes out of their way to make residents feel loved. While most recent reviews highlight exceptional care and personalized support, older reviews contain serious allegations regarding medication management and staff attentiveness.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 19 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“I can honestly say that Brookdale at Weddington was a port in a storm for our family. I could never really picture my Dad in assisted living, but as soon as my sister and I walked into Brookdale we felt immediately at home.”
“The staff has taken such good care of my mom. She has Parkinson’s and needs a lot of extra care in doing dai”
“Both my grandmother and dad stayed there, each for several years. The staff is so nice and provide excellent care. I like that it is a smaller facility, offering more personalized support and services.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for one resident. Specifically, metoprolol tartrate was administered on four separate occasions despite the resident's heart rate being documented below the required threshold of 60 beats per minute.
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for one resident. Specifically, metoprolol tartrate was administered on multiple occasions despite the resident's heart rate being below the ordered hold parameter of 60 beats per minute.
The facility failed to ensure proper referral and follow-up for a resident who required a dermatology visit for a scalp lesion. There was no documentation of the referral occurring, no physician orders for wound dressing, and no documentation of the lesion in the resident's care notes.
The facility failed to ensure necessary referral and follow-up for a resident who required a dermatology visit for a scalp lesion. There was no documentation of the referral being completed, no physician orders for wound dressing, and no documentation of the lesion in the resident's care notes.
The facility failed to provide supervision according to the assessed needs of a resident with a history of repeated falls, injuries, and ER visits. Specifically, the resident's care plan and interventions were not effectively implemented to prevent falls despite documented high-risk status.
The facility failed to provide supervision according to the assessed needs of a resident with a history of repeated falls, injuries, and fractures. Specifically, for a resident who was bedbound and required two-person transfers, there were multiple documented falls in 2022 where no specific interventions were implemented to address the high risk of injury.
The facility failed to ensure that therapeutic diets, including texture-modified diets, were served as ordered by the resident's physician. Specifically, a resident with dysphagia was served cucumber salad and a baked potato with the peel and without gravy, which did not comply with the required mechanical soft diet specifications. Staff members reported a lack of access to therapeutic diet menus and inconsistent adherence to dietary modification guidelines.
The facility failed to ensure that therapeutic diets, specifically texture-modified diets, were served as ordered by the resident's physician. During a lunch service observation, a medication aide served a resident with dysphagia a regular diet item (cucumber salad) and failed to provide the required modified components such as gravy and peeled potatoes. This resulted in the resident receiving food textures that did not comply with their prescribed mechanical soft diet.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
19 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Oakbridge Terrace @ Matthews Glen
1.8 miAssisted Living · Matthews, NC
Matthews Health & Rehab Center
1.9 miNursing Home · Matthews, NC
Willowbrooke Court Sc Ctr at Matthews Glen
2.0 miNursing Home · Matthews, NC
S & T Senior Care Lakeside
2.0 miAdult Family Home · Charlotte, NC
The Post at Providence
2.1 miAdult Family Home · Charlotte, NC
Royal Park Rehabilitation & Health Center
3.2 miNursing Home · Matthews, NC