See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Supported Living

Annaviga Home Supported Living

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate, rn-led specialized care. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

372 Clovernook St, South Richland · Richland, WA 99336Licensed & Active
Source: WA DSHS — view official record
Google rating
5.0/5

based on 23 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Annaviga Home Supported Living

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is an excellent choice for families managing high-acuity needs like advanced dementia or TBI, thanks to the owner's background as an RN. The environment is exceptionally well-regarded for being clean and peaceful, providing a high level of emotional support for both residents and their spouses.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

23 reviews on Google
Families seeking specialized care for dementia or terminal illness will find this facility highly regarded for its compassionate, RN-led nursing and person-centered approach. Reviewers consistently praise the beautiful, clean environment and the exceptional patience of the staff with high-needs residents, though the reviews primarily focus on the quality of care rather than specific amenities like food or activities.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
FoodN/AStaff10.0Clean10.0ActivitiesN/AMedsN/AMemory10.0Comms9.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate, RN-led specialized care
  • Beautiful, clean, and well-maintained environment
  • Exceptine expertise in dementia and TBI management
  • Warm and welcoming atmosphere

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02024(7)5.02025(4)5.02026(12)

Distribution · 23 analyzed

5
23
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

How They Respond to Reviews

17%response rate

This facility rarely responds to reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1Since the facility is RN-led, how does that specialized nursing oversight specifically benefit residents with complex medical needs?
  • 2We are looking for expertise in memory care; could you tell us more about your specific approach to managing dementia and TBI?
  • 3The environment looks so beautiful and well-maintained; what kind of daily activities or social programs do you have planned to keep residents engaged in such a lovely setting?
  • 4How does your team ensure that the warm and welcoming atmosphere stays consistent for new residents during their transition into the home?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the protocol for the nursing staff to provide immediate care?
  • 6I noticed the team is very engaged in communicating with families through reviews; how does the staff typically keep us updated on our loved one's day-to-day well-being?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

Mimo and her staff are incredible. It’s been life changing for my mom to be in a safe, caring environment that excels at managing her very advanced stage of dementia.

Memory care family member · 2025★★★★★

Mimo was that angel. ... My dad was diagnosed with a terminal cancer back in August of 2024. Come March of 2025 he fell and ended up getting a TBI...

Family of resident with TBI/terminal illness · 2025★★★★★

Mimo not only took care of my husband, but also took special care with me as a spouse. It was clear from the moment, my husband entered Mimi’s home that he was at home as well.

Spouse of resident · 2024★★★★★
Source: 23 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services

5total
21deficiencies
Mar 18, 2026Investigation

A follow-up inspection on 2026-05-18 (documented in a separate attached letter) noted that this deficiency was corrected.

Client servicesWAC 388-101D-0145

The facility failed to implement response procedures when a client fell and sustained a head injury, resulting in delayed medical treatment and increased risk to the client.

Mar 18, 2026Investigation

The inspection report references two complaint numbers: 208940 and 215113.

Client servicesWAC 388-101D-0145

The provider failed to implement response procedures and support when a client fell and sustained a head injury, resulting in delayed medical treatment and increased risk of harm.

Feb 18, 2026Investigation

The facility is also referenced in a follow-up inspection letter dated 2026-04-23, which states the identified deficiencies were corrected.

ComplianceWAC 388-101-3020

The provider failed to ensure accuracy in reporting to the Department regarding a client elopement and safety incident.

Physical and safety requirementsWAC 388-101D-0170

The provider failed to ensure a safe environment by screwing the client's bedroom window shut to prevent elopement, creating a fire/safety hazard by blocking emergency egress.

Policies and proceduresWAC 388-101D-0060

The provider failed to implement policies and procedures regarding missing persons when a client eloped, leading to a delayed response and failure to notify authorities in a timely manner.

Feb 18, 2026Investigation

The report references two complaints: 208677 and 210303.

Policies and proceduresWAC 388-101D-0060

The provider failed to implement policy and procedures related to missing persons when a client eloped, resulting in a delayed response, delayed notification to DDCS, and placing the client and community at risk.

ComplianceWAC 388-101-3020

The provider failed to ensure accuracy in reporting to the Department regarding a client's unsafe environment, which precluded the department from knowledge and response to safety incidents.

Physical and safety requirementsWAC 388-101D-0170

The provider failed to ensure a safe environment by screwing the client's bedroom window shut, which disallowed emergency egress.

Sep 24, 2025Inspection

The provider was initially certified on 11/07/2024.; Pages 16-26 of 26 were provided. Sample size refers to the 3 clients sampled for multiple WAC violations, with an additional reference to Client 4 for specific IISP deficiencies.

Client health services supportWAC 388-101D-0150

Failed to provide clear protocols for PRN medication and failed to document physician instructions for bowel management.

Individual financial planWAC 388-101D-0240

Provider failed to develop and implement a complete Individual Financial Plan (IFP) and/or obtain required signatures for 3 sampled clients.

Mandated reporting to the departmentWAC 388-101-4150

Failed to report a serious self-abuse incident (client cutting self) to the Complaint Resolution Unit as required.

Physical and safety requirementsWAC 388-101D-0170

Failed to regulate and/or document household water temperatures, with some readings found exceeding 141-146 degrees Fahrenheit.

Reconciling and verifying client accountsWAC 388-101D-0255

Provider failed to ensure provider-managed client financial accounts were reconciled and verified for Client 3 as required.

Policies and proceduresWAC 388-101D-0060

Failed to implement policy for immediate reporting of suspected abuse/incidents, resulting in a six-day delay for a critical incident report.

Client refusal to participate in servicesWAC 388-101D-0185

Failed to develop a complete refusal plan for a client refusing CPAP therapy, including lack of documentation on risks and provider efforts.

Client's property recordsWAC 388-101D-0390

Provider failed to maintain current, written property records for 3 sampled clients.

Long-term care worker requirementsWAC 388-101D-0087

Failed to ensure two staff members completed the required 5-hour orientation and safety training prior to working with clients.

Documentation of the individual instruction and support planWAC 388-101D-0215

Provider failed to ensure documented client agreement with IISP for 3 sampled clients and failed to ensure Client 4's IISP incorporated pertinent health and safety instructions.

ComplianceWAC 388-101-3020

Failed to implement a system for managing client Basic Food benefits to prevent co-mingling of groceries between clients with different assistance units.

Administrator responsibilities and trainingWAC 388-101D-0055

Failed to maintain documentation showing that four staff members reviewed and signed the required DSHS form 10-403 for mandatory reporting.

Confidentiality of client recordsWAC 388-101D-0370

Provider failed to ensure authorized release of information forms for 3 sampled clients prior to accompanying them to medical appointments.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call