Limited public data on Villas at King Road, the, Villa B. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 12 Google reviews
Email Villas at King Road, the, Villa B to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit Villas at King Road, the, Villa B in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
Families should approach this facility with significant caution due to serious allegations regarding HIPAA violations, mismanagement of medical information, and poor communication with family members. While some reviewers praise the clean environment and the compassionate nature of certain staff members, multiple reports highlight severe issues with care quality and administrative dishonesty.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 12 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“My mom is extremely stubborn and set in her ways. I am so happy with the care and attention she has received since placing her here.”
“At Christmas the residents were all adopted and given gifts from the community. It was so great to make this happen and to be apart of it.”
“They wouldn't have there own mom n dad living here. Nuff said”
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00205316 was conducted on February 9, 2024, and no deficiencies were cited .
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaint AZ00195044 and AZ00199899 conducted on October 3, 2023:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to implement policies and procedures to cover in-service education for employees for one of two employees sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure manual, reviewed January 15, 2020, revealed a policy covering inservice education for employees which indicated employees were required to receive six hours of continuing education every calendar year. 2. A review of E3's (hired November 2019) personnel record revealed evidence E3 received five hours of continuing education 2022. Evidence E3 received any continuing education in 2023 was unavailable for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged E3's personnel record did not contain at least six hours of in-service education in 2022.
Based on document review, record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a caregiver provided a resident with the assisted living services in the resident's service plan and documented the services provided in the resident's medical record, for two of two residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a current service plan indicating R1 received directed care services. A review of R2's medical record revealed a current service plan indicating R2 received personal care services. R1's and R2's service plan indicated each resident was to receive the service "Showering, Set-up, Standby Assist, 2x per week," "Basic Skin Care Do skin checks with each shower...Check for dry skin daily and moisturize..." and "Offer at least 1 glass of liquid to drink at every meal." 2. A review of R1's and R2's medical records revealed a document titled, "Caregiver ADL Checklist," dated September 2023, used for documenting services provided and activities of daily living. The documents included a section titled, "Grooming," which included bathing, skin check and apply lotion, as well as a section titled, "Food & Fluids" to document the respective services. Evidence the services were provided on September 9, 20, 28 or 29, 2023 was unavailable for review. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged evidence R1 and R2 were provided services and documented as described in R1's and R2's service plan was unavailable for review.
Based on document review and interview the manager failed to ensure that policies and procedures were reviewed at least once every three years. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure manual, indicated it was reviewed January 15, 2020. 2. In an interview E1 reported the facility policies and procedures are updated individually throughout the year, however E1 acknowledged the policies and procedures had not been reviewed as a whole every three years as required.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Villas at King Road, the, Villa a
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Starfish Care Homes
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Starfish Care Homes
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Starfish Care Homes, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Starfish Care Homes, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Starfish Care Homes, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ