Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention passionate and caring staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 13 Google reviews

Email Village Community Services to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Village Community Services highly. Reviewers highlight: passionate and caring staff, strong focus on inclusivity and community access. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Village Community Services is praised by reviewers for its long-term commitment to inclusivity and community access for its clients. Supporters highlight the organization's passionate staff and the presence of many long-term residents, which they view as a testament to the quality of care provided.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 14 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“Village has Givin life to all for inclusiveness And community access and great support to our clients, management is always making things better.”
“Village communities is so passionate and caring with wha5 they do. Talked to one lady had been there 30 years! Bunch of long term peeps and that says a lot”
“Fabulous organization of caring human beings.”
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
Investigation also referenced complaint number 218627.
The provider failed to alert the Nurse Delegator of a client's change in skin condition (rash), resulting in a delay of care and treatment provided by non-nursing staff.
The provider failed to have the Individual Instruction Support Plan (IISP) for 4 of 4 clients readily available on-site, as binders were missing or taken off-site.
This report covers complaints 213945 and 214356. Management was aware of the financial exploitation but decided internally not to report it to the department.
The provider failed to report financial exploitation to the department's Complaint Resolution Unit (CRU). Staff members identified that client funds were used for personal staff use (e.g., purchasing a staff drink with client funds), but failed to initiate a mandated report, precluding the department from investigating the financial exploitation.
Letter confirms that Compliance Determination(s) 74455 and 59496 have been corrected and no deficiencies were found during the 03/18/2026 follow-up inspection.
Deficiency previously cited was corrected.
This letter serves as formal notice of a $200.00 civil fine.
The provider failed to ensure one client received medications from a staff member who was nurse delegated to administer topical medications, placing the client at risk of harm. This is an uncorrected deficiency previously cited on October 23, 2024.
This is an uncorrected deficiency previously cited on 10/23/2024. The provided documents include both the 05/14/2025 follow-up report and the 10/24/2024 initial complaint investigation report.
Provider failed to ensure a staff member was nurse delegated to administer topical medications to Client 2. Staff member signed the MAR as administering medications without proper delegation.
This document is a follow-up letter confirming that deficiencies identified in a prior investigation (compliance determination 33191) were corrected.
Deficiency previously found was corrected.
A follow-up inspection on 07/09/2025 found that these deficiencies were corrected.
Provider failed to ensure bank accounts were reconciled and verified monthly by a staff person who did not handle the financial transactions.
Provider failed to ensure a client was protected from financial exploitation; staff stole checkbook/passwords leading to unauthorized purchases, missing funds, and overdraft fees.
This document indicates a follow-up inspection resulted in no deficiencies, confirming prior violations were corrected.; The document also notes a finding regarding the lack of documented consent from housemates for sharing a home with a Community Protection client.
Provider failed to ensure mismanaged client funds were reimbursed; multiple clients were charged late fees on bills that were not reimbursed by the provider.
Provider failed to implement IISP for two clients: Client 3 had a non-functioning alarm, and Client 4 was served food not prepared according to their IISP.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
13 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit villagecommunitysvcs.org
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Fields Senior Living at Smokey Point
< 1 miAssisted Living · Arlington, WA
Arlington Health and Rehabilitation
3.4 miNursing Home · Arlington, WA
Olympic Place Retirement and Assisted Living Community
3.6 miAssisted Living · Arlington, WA
Cascade Valley Senior Living
3.8 miAssisted Living · Arlington, WA
Fieldstone Memory Care of Marysville
4.2 miAssisted Living · Marysville, WA
The Gardens at Marysville, Independent Living & Assisted Liv
4.9 miAssisted Living · Marysville, WA