See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

The Ridge an Encore Community

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and dedicated care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

1501 Nw Tower View Cir, Silverdale, WA 9838354 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: WA DSHS — view official record
Google rating
4.2/5

based on 29 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
The Ridge an Encore Community Assisted Living in Silverdale, WA — Street View
Street View

Watch The Ridge an Encore Community

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

The Ridge has a strong reputation for its specialized memory care programming and engaging activities, which remain a highlight for many families. However, given the recent concerns regarding management changes and potential staffing shifts, we recommend asking specifically about current staff-to-resident ratios and how the new management company oversees daily care compared to previous years.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

29 reviews on Google
The Ridge is a dedicated memory care facility that has historically received high praise for its compassionate staff and engaging activities. However, recent reviews from late 2023 and 2024 express significant concern regarding a change in management, with some families alleging that new leadership prioritizes financial goals over resident care quality.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food10.0Staff8.0Clean9.0Activities10.0MedsN/AMemory9.0Comms8.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate and dedicated care staff
  • Engaging and thoughtful resident activities
  • Clean and welcoming facility environment
  • Responsive management and nursing communication

Concerns

  • Declining quality of care under new management (Aidan Health Services) (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2341.02017(1)4.82018(12)1.02020(2)5.02022(5)5.02023(1)4.32024(12)

Distribution · 33 analyzed

5
26
4
2
3
0
2
0
1
5

How They Respond to Reviews

100%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We noticed how much management values feedback from the community; how do you currently use resident and family input to shape the care provided here?
  • 2Since the facility is such a cozy, intimate size, how do you ensure every resident gets personalized attention during their daily routines?
  • 3We've heard great things about the resident activities; could you walk us through some of the more engaging or thoughtful programs planned for this month?
  • 4How does the nursing team communicate with families regarding any changes in a resident's health or daily needs?
  • 5With the recent transitions in management, what specific steps have been taken to maintain the high standard of compassionate care the staff is known for?
  • 6How is the facility maintained to ensure the environment stays as clean and welcoming as it appears today?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The activities director is amazing and continually looks for new and exciting things to do with the residents to engage them and make them feel important.

Memory care family member · 2024★★★★★

The Ridge is in my opinion the benchmark for excellence. From the Executive Director to the...

Memory care family member · 2024★★★★★

The staff has gone out of their way to reach out and keep us informed. When we visit or call, we are always treated kindly and have all our questions answered by the nursing staff.

Memory care family member · 2022★★★★★
Source: 29 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services

6total
22deficiencies
Aug 14, 2025Fire

Original inspection on 05/08/2025 was marked Disapproved. Follow-up inspection on 08/14/2025 confirmed all violations were corrected and status is now Approved.

Emergency Evacuation DrillsIFC 0405.6 2021Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing fire drills are being conducted once per shift per quarter for the last 12 months.

Fire-resistance-rated constructionIFC 701.6 2021Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing annual inspection of fire-resistance-rated construction (fire wall inspection).

Sprinkler systemsIFC 903.5 2021Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Missing documentation for fire department connection 5-year hydrostatic test, missing escutcheon ring at front entrance overhang, and loaded sprinkler head at front entrance overhang.

Carbon monoxide alarmsIFC 915.6 2021 WACCorrected Aug 14, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing testing and maintenance of carbon monoxide alarms.

Power TestIFC 1031.10.2 2021Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing annual 1.5 hour test for exit signs and emergency lights.

Fire Door Inspection and TestingNFPA 80Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing annual inspection of fire doors.

Emergency Lighting Equipment Inspection and TestingIFC 1032.10 2021Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Failed to maintain exit signs #1 and #2; not illuminated and do not turn on when tested.

Activation TestIFC 1032.10.1 2021Corrected Aug 14, 2025

Facility failed to provide documentation showing monthly 30-second test for exit signs and emergency lights.

May 8, 2025Fire

Inspection conducted by the Office of the State Fire Marshal. The facility implemented a fire watch voluntarily during the period the alarm system could not dial out.

Admin Complaint

Facility was upgrading phone lines and fire alarm system phone lines were updated by mistake. The fire alarm system was operational but would not dial out to the monitoring company. Facility implemented a fire watch until the system was back to normal status. There was no fire, no sprinkler activation, no evacuations, and no injuries.

Nov 18, 2024Inspection

Follow-up inspection on 02/19/2025 confirmed that the deficiencies listed were corrected.

Orientation training requirementsWAC 388-112A-0200Corrected Dec 3, 2024

Facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 sampled staff received required 70-hour Long Term Care training prior to providing care.

Background checksWAC 388-78A-2466Corrected Dec 3, 2024

Facility failed to conduct a department Washington state name and date of birth background check for 1 of 6 sampled staff.

Specialty training and supervision requirementsWAC 388-112A-0495Corrected Dec 3, 2024

Facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 sampled staff were trained within 120 days of hire.

Tuberculosis Testing RequiredWAC 388-78A-2480Corrected Dec 3, 2024

Facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 sampled staff had an initial TB skin test within 3 days of employment.

May 2, 2024Investigation

The complaint investigation included allegations of untrained staff, insufficient staffing, and disrespectful staff. No evidence was found to support the allegation of staff disrespecting residents.

What are the CPR and first-aid training requirements?WAC 388-112A-0720

Personnel records showed two former and one current staff member did not have current CPR/First Aid cards.

Jul 19, 2023Fire

An inspection on 05/24/2023 resulted in a 'Disapproved' status. A follow-up inspection on 07/19/2023 confirmed that all violations had been corrected.

Testing and MaintenanceIFC 903.5 2009, 2012, 2015, 2018

Failed to provide documentation for quarterly sprinkler system inspections.

Portable Fire ExtinguishersIFC 906.2 2015, 2018

K extinguisher in kitchen not maintained; no annual inspection conducted.

Inspection and MaintenanceIFC 912.7 2018

Failed to provide documentation for fire department connection five-year hydrostatic test.

Power TestIFC 1031.10.2 2018

Failed to provide documentation for annual 1.5 hour power test for exit signs and emergency lighting.

Single- and Multiple- Station Smoke AlarmsIFC 907.2.10 2018

Smoke detector by room B6 was less than 3 feet from a vent.

MaintenanceIFC 1203.4 2018

Failed to provide documentation for annual servicing of generator.

Working Space and ClearanceIFC 604.3 2018

Electrical panel in kitchen was blocked by various items.

Smoke Detector SensitivityIFC 907.8.3 2012, 2015, 2018

Failed to provide documentation showing sensitivity testing for the fire alarm system.

Fire
CleanReport

No violations were observed during this inspection.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call