Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and respectful care. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 7 Google reviews
Email The Indigo at Pikeville to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate The Indigo at Pikeville highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and respectful care, polite and professional staff. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families can expect a compassionate environment where staff members are frequently praised for treating residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. While most reviews highlight a professional and polite team, there is a single highly critical recent review that advises against using the facility.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 7 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“They treated my Mom with kindness, respect, and dignity. They were always patient with her. I felt like there were our family.”
“Excellent facility. They combine excellent care given by a professional staff with great compassion shown to residents making no difference in their mental capabilities.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders, resulting in a 16% medication error rate during the 8:00am medication pass. Specifically, a medication aide crushed enteric-coated Ferrous Sulfate tablets for Resident #4, despite there being no order to crush medications and instructions that the coating should not be disturbed.
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for several residents, including errors with medications for heart rate, blood pressure, iron, and constipation. Additionally, record reviews revealed errors regarding antibiotic and laxative administration.
The facility failed to ensure the Special Care Unit (SCU) was free of hazards by allowing items such as disposable razors, antifungal cream, and prescription toothpaste to be accessible to residents. Observations and interviews confirmed that hazardous or ingestible items were not stored or secured according to the facility's dementia-specific program and safety policies.
The facility failed to maintain the Special Care Unit (SCU) in a manner free of hazards and obstructions. Specifically, hazardous items including disposable shaving razors, antifungal cream, and various toiletries were found accessible to residents in 27 resident rooms.
The facility failed to respond immediately to an incident involving a resident who was found unresponsive without a pulse. Despite the resident being documented as a 'Full Code,' staff failed to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as required by facility policy and state regulations.
The facility failed to ensure medications were administered using proper infection control measures. During a medication pass, a medication aide was observed administering a nasal spray without wearing gloves, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and disease transmission.
A medication aide failed to follow infection control measures by not wearing gloves when administering a nasal medication to a resident. Additionally, the aide used ungloved hands to document the administration in the computer system, increasing the risk of cross-contamination.
The facility failed to process resident refunds within 30 days of a resident's death. Specifically, two out of four residents reviewed had not yet been refunded the remaining balance of their care costs.
The facility failed to provide supervision in accordance with residents' assessed needs and facility policy for 2 of 5 sampled residents. This failure resulted in falls that caused significant injuries, including a nose and facial fracture with a closed head injury for one resident, and facial contusions and chipped teeth for another.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
7 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Wayne County Rest Villa no. 1
2.8 miAssisted Living · Fremont, NC
Wayne County Rest Villa no. 2
2.8 miAssisted Living · Fremont, NC
Morning Glory Family Care
6.5 miAdult Family Home · Eureka, NC
Brookdale Country Day Road
6.8 miAssisted Living · Goldsboro, NC
Helping Hands Assisted Living
7.1 miAssisted Living · Goldsboro, NC
Somerset Court of Goldsboro
7.3 miAssisted Living · Goldsboro, NC