See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

The Indigo at Pikeville

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and respectful care. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

5383 Us Hwy 117 North, Pikeville, NC 2786340 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: NC DHSR — view official record
Google rating
4.4/5

based on 7 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch The Indigo at Pikeville

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

The facility has a strong history of providing compassionate, dignified care and a professional staff. However, because the most recent review is highly critical, families should conduct an in-person visit to verify current care standards.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

7 reviews on Google
Families can expect a compassionate environment where staff members are frequently praised for treating residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. While most reviews highlight a professional and polite team, there is a single highly critical recent review that advises against using the facility.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
FoodN/AStaff10.0CleanN/AActivitiesN/AMedsN/AMemory10.0CommsN/AValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate and respectful care
  • Polite and professional staff
  • High level of resident dignity

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02016(1)5.02018(2)5.02025(3)1.02026(1)

Distribution · 7 analyzed

5
6
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
1

How They Respond to Reviews

57%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It’s wonderful to see how much the staff seems to value resident dignity; how do you personally ensure that every resident feels respected and heard in such a close-knit community?
  • 2Since this is a smaller, intimate community of 40, how does the staff manage to maintain that high level of personalized, professional care for everyone?
  • 3I noticed the management is very engaged in communicating with families online; how can we expect to stay in regular contact with the team regarding our loved one's well-being?
  • 4What does a typical day of social activities and engagement look like for the residents here at The Indigo?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency or a sudden change in health during the night, what specific protocols are in place to ensure immediate care?
  • 6How does the team handle any changes in care needs to ensure that the high standard of compassionate care remains consistent?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

They treated my Mom with kindness, respect, and dignity. They were always patient with her. I felt like there were our family.

Resident's family · 2025★★★★★

Excellent facility. They combine excellent care given by a professional staff with great compassion shown to residents making no difference in their mental capabilities.

Long-term resident's family · 2016★★★★★
Source: 7 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation

18total
20deficiencies
Dec 17, 2025Follow-up
Medication AdministrationD 358

The facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for several residents, including errors with medications for heart rate, blood pressure, iron, and constipation. Additionally, record reviews revealed errors regarding antibiotic and laxative administration.

Dec 17, 2025Follow-up
Medication AdministrationD 358

The facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders, resulting in a 16% medication error rate during the 8:00am medication pass. Specifically, a medication aide crushed enteric-coated Ferrous Sulfate tablets for Resident #4, despite there being no order to crush medications and instructions that the coating should not be disturbed.

Aug 21, 2025Other
Housekeeping and FurnishingsD 079

The facility failed to maintain the Special Care Unit (SCU) in a manner free of hazards and obstructions. Specifically, hazardous items including disposable shaving razors, antifungal cream, and various toiletries were found accessible to residents in 27 resident rooms.

Aug 21, 2025Other
Housekeeping and FurnishingsD079

The facility failed to ensure the Special Care Unit (SCU) was free of hazards by allowing items such as disposable razors, antifungal cream, and prescription toothpaste to be accessible to residents. Observations and interviews confirmed that hazardous or ingestible items were not stored or secured according to the facility's dementia-specific program and safety policies.

Feb 5, 2024Complaint
Personal Care and SupervisionC-tag

The facility failed to respond immediately to an incident involving a resident who was found unresponsive without a pulse. Despite the resident being documented as a 'Full Code,' staff failed to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as required by facility policy and state regulations.

Nov 2, 2023Complaint
Medication AdministrationD 371

The facility failed to ensure medications were administered using proper infection control measures. During a medication pass, a medication aide was observed administering a nasal spray without wearing gloves, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and disease transmission.

Nov 2, 2023Complaint
Medication Administration10A NCAC 13F .1004(n)

A medication aide failed to follow infection control measures by not wearing gloves when administering a nasal medication to a resident. Additionally, the aide used ungloved hands to document the administration in the computer system, increasing the risk of cross-contamination.

Settlement Of Cost Of Care10A NCAC 13F .1106(f)

The facility failed to process resident refunds within 30 days of a resident's death. Specifically, two out of four residents reviewed had not yet been refunded the remaining balance of their care costs.

Nov 1, 2022Follow-up
Personal Care and SupervisionN/A

The facility failed to provide supervision in accordance with residents' assessed needs and facility policy for 2 of 5 sampled residents. This failure resulted in falls that caused significant injuries, including a nose and facial fracture with a closed head injury for one resident, and facial contusions and chipped teeth for another.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Contact