Loading EveryPlace content…
Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and patient memory care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 41 Google reviews
Email Summerfield of Roseville to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Summerfield of Roseville highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and patient memory care staff, clean, bright, and well-maintained facility. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Summerfield of Roseville is highly regarded by families for its compassionate, family-like care and its specialized approach to memory care and dementia. Reviewers frequently praise the staff's patience and the facility's clean, bright, and well-maintained environment. However, one reviewer raised serious concerns regarding the facility's ability to handle complex behavioral needs, and a historical concern regarding understaffing was noted.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 45 analyzed
The owner provides highly personalized, empathetic responses that frequently use the reviewer's name and reference specific details from their story. They demonstrate deep emotional intelligence, particularly when addressing bereavement or the transition of loved ones into care.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff and environment at Summerfield were outstanding for the 5 months my mother lived there. They were extremely caring and patient, and treated her like family.”
“The facility is small but immaculate with a lively garden area. The staff treats residents with kindness and dignity (I visit daily).”
“The amount of personal attention and care is remarkable. I couldn’t have chosen a better place. All residents have the best opportunities available to thrive, the likes of which I could never have imagined.”
Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division
FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
This report details an investigation into a complaint regarding staff failure to follow universal precautions for scabies. Based on observation and record review, the facility was found to be following required infection control protocols. Consequently, the allegation was deemed Unfounded.
The facility was visited for a Case Management review and met with the Executive Director. The primary finding noted was that the licensee has an overdue license fee balance of $10,860.00, which was billed on 02/05/2025. The facility was instructed to provide proof of payment or a payment plan by 11/28/2025.
This report details a complaint investigation conducted on 07/22/2025, with findings documented on 08/26/2025. The allegation that resident needs were not being met due to insufficient staffing was investigated. The department found no evidence to support this allegation, concluding that the complaint was unfounded.
The annual inspection was conducted on 05/07/2025 and covered a review of resident and staff files, as well as a tour of the facility areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited per Title 22 Regulations during this visit.
The annual inspection was conducted on 05/07/2025 and covered a review of resident and staff files, as well as a tour of the facility areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited per Title 22 Regulations during this visit.
This was an unannounced Case Management visit conducted on 09/13/2024. The primary finding was the issuance of an immediate exclusion order for an employee (S1), requiring the facility to immediately cease all contact and physical presence of this individual with clients. No other specific citation codes or deficiencies were listed in the report.
The annual inspection identified two deficiencies related to record keeping. The first deficiency concerns incomplete personnel files, specifically missing health screening/TB records and job applications. The second deficiency relates to missing updated physician's reports for residents with dementia. Both deficiencies are classified as Type B, requiring corrective action by May 15, 2024.
Snh Cal Tenant LLC; Northstar Senior Living, INC.
MAY TATE
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
41 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit summerfieldroseville.com
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Vista Roseville Senior Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA
Oak Ridge Healthcare Center
1.2 miNursing Home · Roseville, CA
Meadow Oaks of Roseville
1.2 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA
The Terraces of Roseville
1.3 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA
Roseville Point Health & Wellness Center
1.3 miNursing Home · Roseville, CA
Oakmont of Roseville
1.6 miAssisted Living · Roseville, CA