See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Summerfield of Roseville

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and patient memory care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

110 Sterling Court, Maidu · Roseville, CA 9566164 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CA CCLD — view official record
Google rating
4.7/5

based on 40 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Summerfield of Roseville Assisted Living in Roseville, CA — Street View
Street View

Watch Summerfield of Roseville

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is an excellent choice for families seeking a clean, warm, and highly attentive environment for loved ones with dementia. While the staff's compassion is a consistent highlight, you should specifically inquire about their protocols for managing high-acuity behavioral issues and confirm current staffing levels during evening and weekend shifts.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

40 reviews on Google
Summerfield of Roseville is highly regarded by families for its compassionate, family-like care and its specialized approach to memory care and dementia. Reviewers frequently praise the staff's patience and the facility's clean, bright, and well-maintained environment. However, one reviewer raised serious concerns regarding the facility's ability to handle complex behavioral needs, and a historical concern regarding understaffing was noted.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food5.0Staff9.0Clean10.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemory8.0Comms9.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Compassionate and patient memory care staff
  • Clean, bright, and well-maintained facility
  • Strong focus on resident engagement and activities
  • Transparent and professional family communication

Concerns

  • Inability to manage complex behavioral needs in memory care
  • Potential for understaffing during certain shifts

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'15(1)'17(1)'19(8)'21(2)'24(3)'26(3)

Distribution · 44 analyzed

5
39
4
3
3
0
2
0
1
2

How They Respond to Reviews

60%response rate
Excellent

The owner provides highly personalized, empathetic responses that frequently use the reviewer's name and reference specific details from their story. They demonstrate deep emotional intelligence, particularly when addressing bereavement or the transition of loved ones into care.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is wonderful to see how bright and well-maintained the facility is; how do you ensure the common areas stay so inviting for the residents?
  • 2I noticed how much the community values communication; how often can we expect updates regarding our loved one's well-being?
  • 3What types of daily activities or social engagement programs are currently most popular with the residents here?
  • 4How does the team approach care for residents who may experience more challenging behavioral changes or periods of agitation?
  • 5With the facility being a more intimate size of 64 residents, how do you manage staffing levels during overnight or weekend shifts to ensure everyone is supported?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the specific protocol for getting immediate care for a resident?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff and environment at Summerfield were outstanding for the 5 months my mother lived there. They were extremely caring and patient, and treated her like family.

Long-term resident's family · 2026★★★★★

The facility is small but immaculate with a lively garden area. The staff treats residents with kindness and dignity (I visit daily).

Daily visitor/Family member · 2024★★★★★

The amount of personal attention and care is remarkable. I couldn’t have chosen a better place. All residents have the best opportunities available to thrive, the likes of which I could never have imagined.

New resident's family · 2025☆☆☆☆
Source: 40 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division

17total
13deficiencies
9 Type A— immediate health risk
4 Type B— non-compliance
Mar 13, 2026Complaint
CleanReport

This report details an investigation into a complaint regarding staff failure to follow universal precautions for scabies. Based on observation and record review, the facility was found to be following required infection control protocols. Consequently, the allegation was deemed Unfounded.

Oct 28, 2025Follow-up
CleanReport

The facility was visited for a Case Management review and met with the Executive Director. The primary finding noted was that the licensee has an overdue license fee balance of $10,860.00, which was billed on 02/05/2025. The facility was instructed to provide proof of payment or a payment plan by 11/28/2025.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

This report details a complaint investigation conducted on 07/22/2025, with findings documented on 08/26/2025. The allegation that resident needs were not being met due to insufficient staffing was investigated. The department found no evidence to support this allegation, concluding that the complaint was unfounded.

May 7, 2025Complaint

The annual inspection was conducted on 05/07/2025 and covered a review of resident and staff files, as well as a tour of the facility areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited per Title 22 Regulations during this visit.

Type ACCR 87466

The licensee must ensure residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning. Changes must be documented and brought to the attention of the physician and responsible person.

Type ACCR 87466

The facility failed to reassess the resident (R1) after the resident sustained multiple falls, which posed an immediate health and safety risk.

May 7, 2025Routine
CleanReport

The annual inspection was conducted on 05/07/2025 and covered a review of resident and staff files, as well as a tour of the facility areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited per Title 22 Regulations during this visit.

Sep 13, 2024Follow-up

This was an unannounced Case Management visit conducted on 09/13/2024. The primary finding was the issuance of an immediate exclusion order for an employee (S1), requiring the facility to immediately cease all contact and physical presence of this individual with clients. No other specific citation codes or deficiencies were listed in the report.

Type AN/A

The facility was ordered to immediately exclude an employee (S1) from all contact with clients and from being physically present in the facility due to an immediate exclusion order.

Apr 24, 2024Routine

The annual inspection identified two deficiencies related to record keeping. The first deficiency concerns incomplete personnel files, specifically missing health screening/TB records and job applications. The second deficiency relates to missing updated physician's reports for residents with dementia. Both deficiencies are classified as Type B, requiring corrective action by May 15, 2024.

Type B87412(a)

Personnel records are incomplete; specifically, health screening and TB records are missing in some files, and job applications are missing in all reviewed files. This poses a potential risk to residents.

Type B87705(c)(5)

The facility failed to ensure that all residents with dementia have updated physician's reports in their files. This poses a potential risk to residents.

May 31, 2023Follow-up

The inspection was a Case Management follow-up visit conducted on 05/31/2023. Two deficiencies were cited: one Type A citation regarding medication administration compliance, and one Type B citation concerning the failure to provide an updated medical assessment for the resident with dementia. The facility must address these issues by the specified Plan of Correction due dates.

Type ACCR 87465(c)(2)

The facility failed to ensure medication was given according to physician directions. Specifically, the LPA found that R1's medications were observed to be full and not given to R1.

Type BHSC 87705(c)(5)

The facility did not ensure the resident with dementia (R1) had an updated medical assessment or reappraisal as required. This poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the person in care.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Snh Cal Tenant LLC; Northstar Senior Living, INC.

Administrator

MAY TATE

Source: State licensing data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call