Assisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
1889 Silversmith Rd, Northgate · Colorado Springs, CO 80921
About this listing
Catalog updated Jul 5, 2026. Current services and availability are unconfirmed.
Monthly cost
Ask for the full monthly cost, including care fees and one-time charges.
Availability
We don't have live openings. Ask about current availability, waiting lists, and move-in timing.
Reported capacity: 105 residents. This is not the number of openings.
Contact information →Care & support
Usually offers housing and help with everyday tasks, such as bathing and dressing.
This describes the care category. Confirm support for your family member's needs.
Understand care types →Payment options
Payment details are not confirmed in our records. Ask about private pay, insurance, and assistance programs.
Your next step
You don't need to know everything. Start with these questions.
Public Google reviewers rate Stonecreek of Flying Horse highly. Reviewers highlight: modern, clean, and well-maintained facility, warm and attentive staff members. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
StoneCreek of Flying Horse is widely praised for its modern, clean, and hotel-like facility, with many families highlighting the compassionate and friendly staff. However, a small but vocal group of reviewers reports serious concerns regarding understaffing, neglect, and poor food quality, suggesting that the resident experience may be inconsistent.
AI summaries of public opinions. These describe review sentiment, not verified care quality.
Many reviews highlight compassionate and friendly staff, though some report under-trained or insufficient staffing.
Most families report good communication, though some negative reviews cite management responsiveness issues.
Multiple reviewers consistently describe the facility as pristine, clean, and well-kept.
While some praise the chef and dining room, others report cold food and long waits between meals.
Residents and families frequently mention high-quality activities, live music, and social outings.
Families of memory care residents specifically praise the compassionate care and communication provided.
Reviewers note the high cost and express that quality should be higher given the premium price point.
Scores range from 0 (negative) to 10 (positive). They are model interpretations of reviews and are not clinical, safety, or inspection ratings. Unmentioned topics are omitted.
Strengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 68 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff in the memory care took excellent care of her and she really enjoyed them. They genuinely cared about her and always kept us in the loop.”
“The management has been very responsive to any concerns we have had. I highly recommend Stone Creek.”
“They are forever understaffed and its truly sad!!! My Mom was so upset in this place and it was truly heartbreaking!!!”
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO41582 and #CO41629, was completed on 3/10/26. Deficiencies were cited. Based on Interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure the routine and prompt handling of grievances and complaints brought by residents and advocates. (Cross-Reference U540)Findings Include: 1. Residence policyThe residence' s undated grievance policy read "Complaints from residents, family members, or advocates are addressed promptly and effectively." 2. Observations On 3/10/26 at 10:28 a.m., Resident #8 shared seven pictures. On 1/6/26 and 1/16/26, the food was served burnt. 1/9/26 soup was served with very little to no broth. 3. Record reviewa. Resident council notes dated 12/11/25, read in part, Resident #10 had emailed the senior regional culinary director (SRCD) for a meeting about better food. Residents are encouraged to take pictures of their food and email if it is unsatisfactory. Residents are encouraged to fill out rating cards for food. The food was cold, hard, or burnt. Plating needs more presentation, and the food was getting worse. The claims listed online about the kitchen do not meet th.. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the administrator failed to be responsible for day-to-day operations that included reviewing marketing materials and information published by the assisted living residence (ALR) to ensure consistency with the services actually provided by the ALR. Affecting 90 current residents (Cross-reference U1400) Findings include:1. Record Reviewa. An electronic web-based marketing publication from the residence titled "Our delectable Colorado culinary program for seniors" read in part chef prepared meals are made with the finest ingredients and tailored to meet each resident' s dietary needs. Highest quality ingredients and a beautifully presented plate of food. Elevated dining experience by empowering them to make choices that reflect unique preferences, traditions, and family recipes, partnered with [Brand name] creamery to make sure sweet seasonal delights are available daily. We take pride in our dining program, operating at the same level as rest.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to update the care plan with the most current assessment information, affecting three of four sample residents (#1,#2, and #5). Findings Include: 1. Record Review Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 8/16/25 with a diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Heart disease (ASHD), Dyspnea, Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Macular degeneration, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease with Stage 1 through Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease, or Unspecified ChronicKidney Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Primary InsomniaA care plan dated 8/14/24 read in part that Resident #5 was "at risk for falls." A progress note for Resident #5, dated 1/14/26, read in part that Resident #5 had an unwitnessed fall on 1/14/25. Resident #5 had attempted to stand up from the toilet and missed the bar. He fell and hit his head. Emergency medical services (EMS) evaluated the resident.An assessment dated 1/14/26 read that the resident #5 had a change in condition that required more care n..
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A revisit survey was completed on 12/9/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/4/25. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A revisit survey was completed on 12/9/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/4/25. The facility is in compliance with all regulations surveyed. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
A complaint revisit was completed on 9/4/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/18/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure that resident records contained progress notes, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary events, and failed to ensure that the resident records contained documentation of ongoing services provided by external service providers (ESP). Additionally, the residence failed to ensure that staff members had documented, before the end of their shift, events or issues regarding a resident that they observed or reported to them, affecting one of three sample residents. (#22) Findings include:Record ReviewsResident #22 was admitted to the residence on 5/5/25 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. An incident report on 8/31/25 read in part that resident #22 had a fall and hit her face an.. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure that each staff member received training, such as training that includes the care and services provided by the residence, affecting 18 current secured environment (SE) residents. This deficient practice was previously cited; however, the residence had not maintained compliance. Findings Include:Resident #24 was admitted to the residence on 3/8/23, with diagnoses that included dementia.Resident #24' s care plan dated 7/23/25, read that the resident was on a mechanical diet and required feeding assistance. Additional notes in her care plan indicate that she required monitoring for chewing difficulties, hand-over-hand feeding assistance, and staff to remain present at all times. .. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with the authorized practitioner' s ordersassociated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self-administers, affecting one of nine sample Residents (#21). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 9/18/24. Although the facility corrected thedeficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatoryrequirement.Findings include:1. Record reviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/23, diagnoses included dementia and delusional disordersA written practitioners order, with a start date of 5/23/25, directed the residence to administer acetaminophen 325 mg tablets - take two tablets twice daily. .. Based on record review and interviews, the residence failed to make available, either directly or indirectly personal services, including, but not limited to, a system for identifying and reporting resident concerns that require either an immediate individualized approach or ongoing monitoring affecting two of nine sample Resident' s (#21 and #22).Findings include:1. Record reviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/23, diagnoses included dementia, arthritis and hypertension. The care plan, with an effective date of 8/30/23, read in part: Staff will strip Resident #21' s bed every Thursday and put clean sheets on. A document titled Complaints and Concerns read in part: On 3/24/25 Resident #21 submitted a complaint regarding linen changes needing to occur when scheduled. The docu..
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38649, #CO39296, #CO39500 and #CO39579, was completed on 9/4/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure that resident records contained progress notes, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary events, and failed to ensure that the resident records contained documentation of ongoing services provided by external service providers (ESP). Additionally, the residence failed to ensure that staff members had documented, before the end of their shift, events or issues regarding a resident that they observed or reported to them, affecting one of three sample residents. (#22) Findings include:Record ReviewsResident #22 was admitted to the residence on 5/5/25 with a diagnosis of senile deg.. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure that each staff member received training, such as training that includes the care and services provided by the residence, affecting 18 current secured environment (SE) residents. This deficient practice was previously cited; however, the residence had not maintained compliance. Findings Include: Resident #24 was admitted to the residence on 3/8/23, with diagnoses that included dementia.Resident #24' s care plan dated 7/23/25, read that the resident was on a mechanical diet and required feeding assistance. Additional notes in her care plan indicate tha.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with the authorized practitioner' s ordersassociated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self-administers, affecting one of nine sample Residents (#21). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 9/18/24. Although the facility corrected thedeficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatoryrequirement.Findings include:1. Record reviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/23, diagnoses included dementia and delusional disordersA written practitioners order, with a star.. Based on record review and interviews, the residence failed to make available, either directly or indirectly personal services, including, but not limited to, a system for identifying and reporting resident concerns that require either an immediate individualized approach or ongoing monitoring affecting two of nine sample Resident' s (#21 and #22).Findings include:1. Record reviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/23, diagnoses included dementia, arthritis and hypertension. The care plan, with an effective date of 8/30/23, read in part: Staff will strip Resident #21' s bed every Thursday and put clean sheets on. A document titled Complaints and Concerns read in part:.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.12.17 The assisted living residence shall ensure that it has trained staff available to evaluate residents who have fallen or are otherwise unable to independently get up off the floor and provide lift assistance when determined appropriate instead of relying on emergency medical responders. (A) Each situation shall be evaluated to determine if the resident can be assisted in a safe manner such as when the resident has no pain and/or..
A complaint revisit was completed on 9/4/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 9/18/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure that resident records contained progress notes, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary events, and failed to ensure that the resident records contained documentation of ongoing services provided by external service providers (ESP). Additionally, the residence failed to ensure that staff members had documented, before the end of their shift, events or issues regarding a resident that they observed or reported to them, affecting one of three sample residents. (#22) Findings include:Record ReviewsResident #22 was admitted to the residence on 5/5/25 with a diagnosis of senile deg.. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure that each staff member received training, such as training that includes the care and services provided by the residence, affecting 18 current secured environment (SE) residents. This deficient practice was previously cited; however, the residence had not maintained compliance. Findings Include:Resident #24 was admitted to the residence on 3/8/23, with diagnoses that included dementia.Resident #24' s care plan dated 7/23/25, read that the resident was on a mechanical diet and required feeding assistance. Additional notes in her care plan indicate that she required monitoring for chewing .. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with the authorized practitioner' s ordersassociated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self-administers, affecting one of nine sample Residents (#21). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 9/18/24. Although the facility corrected thedeficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatoryrequirement.Findings include:Record reviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/23, diagnoses included dementia and delusional disordersA written practitioners order, with a star.. Based on record review and interviews, the residence failed to make available, either directly or indirectly personal services, including, but not limited to, a system for identifying and reporting resident concerns that require either an immediate individualized approach or ongoing monitoring affecting two of nine sample Resident' s (#21 and #22).Findings include:Record reviewResident #21 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/23, diagnoses included dementia, arthritis and hypertension. The care plan, with an effective date of 8/30/23, read in part: Staff will strip Resident #21' s bed every Thursday and put clean sheets on. A document titled Complaints and Concerns read in part:.. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
Contact the provider directly when you feel ready. Have your questions handy and ask for answers in writing.
Confirm current status with CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
64 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit civitasseniorliving.com
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby places may offer different services. Check care type and availability as you compare.
Liberty Heights Assisted Living
1.3 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Liberty Heights
1.3 miNursing Home · Colorado Springs, CO
New Day Cottages at Pine Creek
3.1 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Legend of Colorado Springs
4.4 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Jackson Creek Senior Living
4.5 miAssisted Living · Monument, CO
Owen-Larson Hope Home
4.8 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Keep this place handy
Optional: get a one-time email with this profile. You can also save or share it without an email address.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.