See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Santa Barbara Memory Care

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and professional care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

325 W Islay St, Oak Park · Santa Barbara, CA 9310136 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CA CCLD — view official record
Google rating
4.0/5

based on 14 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Santa Barbara Memory Care Assisted Living in Santa Barbara, CA — Street View
Street View

Watch Santa Barbara Memory Care

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

The facility offers a secure and compassionate environment that is highly regarded by many families for dementia care. However, you should exercise extreme caution regarding financial transactions and personal property, as multiple reviewers have flagged issues with billing, refunds, and missing belongings.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

14 reviews on Google
Families often praise the compassionate, professional staff and the secure, independent environment provided for residents with dementia. However, there are serious allegations regarding missing personal belongings, difficult reimbursement processes, and potential issues with accounting practices following a facility name change.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
FoodN/AStaff9.0CleanN/AActivitiesN/AMedsN/AMemory8.0Comms7.0Value2.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and professional care staff
  • Secure environment allowing for resident independence
  • Strong communication with family members
  • Well-maintained and upgraded facility

Concerns

  • Difficulty with financial reimbursements and accounting (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Loss or theft of residents' personal belongings

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2341.02016(1)5.02017(2)5.02018(1)5.02019(2)3.02021(3)5.02024(3)3.02025(2)

Distribution · 14 analyzed

5
10
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
3

How They Respond to Reviews

100%response rate
Generic

The owner relies heavily on templated, repetitive responses that often use the old facility name ('Pacifica Senior Living'). While they attempt to personalize some 5-star reviews by name, the content remains largely boilerplate.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is wonderful to see how much care you put into responding to every family member's feedback; how do you ensure that communication remains so consistent between the staff and us as a family?
  • 2Since the facility is so well-maintained and upgraded, what specific features of the environment are designed to help residents feel safe while still enjoying their independence?
  • 3We want to make sure we stay organized with everything; what is the best process for handling monthly billing and any necessary financial adjustments or reimbursements?
  • 4With the focus on memory care, what specific daily activities or sensory programs are in place to keep the residents engaged and stimulated?
  • 5How does the staff handle the management of personal items to ensure that residents' belongings stay safe and organized within their rooms?
  • 6In the event of a sudden medical change or an emergency during the night, what are the specific protocols for getting immediate care for a resident?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The care staff is very loving and patient with their residents. They understand how to care for seniors that are suffering with Dementia and Alzheimer's disease!

Local Guide · 2017★★★★★

I just love how this community is set up for my mom, she is able to roam freely in a secure environment and still be independent.. The care has been amazing since day 1.. Thank you.

Long-term resident's family · 2019★★★★★

Very helpful and conscientious staff. There’s no way that I could do what Pacifica does for my brother.

Local Guide · 2024★★★★★
Source: 14 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division

40total
57deficiencies
25 Type A— immediate health risk
32 Type B— non-compliance
Feb 25, 2026Routine
CleanReport

The facility underwent an unannounced Annual Required Inspection. The initial review noted the required posting of the complaint poster and Resident’s Rights. While the LPA observed the required posting of certain materials, the report explicitly states that no deficiencies were noted during the exit interview, and the inspection was incomplete due to time restraints.

Jan 15, 2026Complaint

This report details a complaint investigation conducted on 01/15/2026, which substantiated allegations of residents being subjected to unsanitary conditions and physical assault due to lack of supervision. The primary deficiency found relates to inadequate supervision, citing CCR 87468.2(a)(4). The facility was advised to improve supervision and resident care practices.

Type BCCR 87468.2(a)(4)

The facility failed to provide care, supervision, and services that meet individual needs. This was evidenced by inadequate supervision provided to a resident (R2), which posed a potential risk to residents in care.

Aug 27, 2025Complaint

The investigation was conducted following a complaint regarding the facility's handling of resident refunds and billing issues. The allegation of not issuing a refund was substantiated based on documentation and interviews. The facility was cited for deficiencies related to admission agreements and the timely processing of mailed payments.

Type BCCR 87507(g)(3)(B)2

Failure to process checks received in the mail in a timely manner poses a potential risk to residents in care.

Jun 25, 2025Complaint

The investigation was conducted following a complaint regarding staff mismanagement of resident medications. The allegation was substantiated, finding evidence of improper handling of medications. One Type A deficiency was cited concerning the proper surrender and documentation of resident property upon discharge.

Type ACCR 87217(i)

Upon discharge of a resident, all cash resources, personal property and valuables of that resident which have been entrusted to the licensee shall be surrendered to the resident, or his responsible person. A signed receipt shall be obtained. This requirement was not met by evidence of Medication Delivery Record date and date specific medication was not provided to R1's representative. This poses an immanent risk to residents in care.

May 21, 2025Follow-up

The inspection, conducted as a Case Management visit, identified two deficiencies. The most serious finding was related to staff clearance, citing a Type A violation because the staff member was not properly registered in required systems. Additionally, a Type B violation was issued for the lack of an immediately available Register of Residents.

Type A87355(a)

The facility failed to ensure that Direct Care Staff 1 (S1) was cleared through Guardian and present on Licensing Information Systems (LIS) at the time of the visit. This poses a risk to residents in care.

Type B87508(b)

The facility did not have a current Register of Residents (LIC9020) available upon demand during normal business hours, which is required for inspection and audit.

Apr 16, 2025Follow-up

The Case Management visit was conducted to address deficiencies noted during a prior investigation regarding the acceptance of a non-conserved individual. Two Type A deficiencies were cited, both related to the facility's failure to ensure proper documentation and adherence to care standards for non-dementia residents in a locked memory care setting. Immediate corrective action is required to mitigate the identified health and safety risks.

Type ACCR 87705(f)(4)(B)

The facility failed to maintain a written statement signed by each non-conserved resident confirming understanding of locked exterior doors or perimeter fence gates and voluntary consent to such upon admission.

Type ACCR 87705(f)(4)(B)

The licensee accepted a non-conserved individual who does not have a dementia diagnosis and does not require the level of care provided by the facility, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

Apr 4, 2025Other
CleanReport

The report documents an office visit conducted on April 4, 2025, to discuss Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Reports filed by Pacifica Senior Living. The facility representative stated that the lawsuits mentioned do not impact the properties, residents, or staff. No specific deficiencies were cited in the provided text.

Mar 19, 2025Follow-up

This Case Management visit was conducted to address deficiencies noted during a prior investigation. The primary deficiency cited relates to the failure to report a resident's death within the required timeframe. This failure to timely report the death constitutes a Type A violation, indicating an immediate health and safety risk.

Type A87211(a)(1)A

The facility failed to report the death of a resident on 3/3/2025 to CCLD until 3/11/2025. This delay poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Pac Coast Inc,gp of Pac Coast Lp;santa Barbara Mgr

Administrator

LISA GERR

Source: State licensing data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call