See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Prestige Senior Living Rosemont

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight friendly and welcoming staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

215 Killion Rd Nw, Yelm, WA 9859770 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: WA DSHS — view official record
Google rating
4.0/5

based on 26 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Prestige Senior Living Rosemont

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Prestige Senior Living Rosemont is highly regarded for its warm, engaging staff and active social environment, making it a potentially great fit for seniors who value community. However, families should be aware of historical reports regarding management turnover and communication challenges; we recommend asking specifically about current leadership stability and how they handle resident feedback.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

26 reviews on Google
Prestige Senior Living Rosemont receives praise for its friendly, attentive staff and vibrant community atmosphere, with many families noting that their loved ones felt welcomed and well-cared for. However, some reviewers have raised significant concerns regarding high management turnover, inconsistent communication, and dissatisfaction with food quality. Prospective families should weigh the positive social environment against reports of administrative instability.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food4.0Staff8.0Clean6.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemoryN/AComms3.0Value4.0

Strengths

  • Friendly and welcoming staff
  • Active and vibrant community life
  • Engaging events for residents
  • Helpful and kind nursing assistants

Concerns

  • High turnover in management and administrative staff (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Poor communication and responsiveness from leadership (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Dissatisfaction with food quality and menu changes (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'15(2)'17(3)'19(10)'22(3)'25(2)'26(1)

Distribution · 27 analyzed

5
17
4
3
3
1
2
3
1
3

How They Respond to Reviews

96%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It's wonderful to see how much the management team engages with feedback online; how would you describe the current communication style between the leadership team and the families?
  • 2We've heard such lovely things about the kindness of the nursing assistants here; how do you ensure that level of personalized care remains consistent during shift changes?
  • 3Could you walk us through a typical weekly menu and explain how much input residents have regarding food variety and meal changes?
  • 4The community seems so vibrant and active; what are some of the favorite social events or outings that residents currently participate in?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the specific protocol for notifying the family and coordinating care?
  • 6With a cozy community of 70 residents, how do you ensure that every person's individual needs are met even when the facility is at full capacity?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

My dad moved to Rosemont after living for 8 years at another independent living community. It was important that he was closer to his family in Yelm and Rosemont was the answer to our prayers.

Family member · 2025★★★★★

I'm a helicopter daughter, and at Rosemont almost daily, and I am always welcomed with smiles from a busy staff - front office, housekeeping, nursing aids, kitchen & wait staff, activities coordinator, bus driver - everyone is welcoming and kind.

Family member · 2020★★★★★

The care I get in the living section is excellent, and I have zero complaint about any of the care givers. My complaint is with the management and the administrative supervisor, Tracy Delano.

Resident · 2016★★★☆☆
Source: 26 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services

3total
11deficiencies
Apr 20, 2026Fire

The inspection on 12/08/2025 resulted in a 'Disapproved' status due to sprinkler system deficiencies. A subsequent inspection on 04/20/2026 confirmed that all previously noted violations were corrected.

Testing and MaintenanceIFC 903.5 2021Corrected Apr 20, 2026

Dry system had pin size holes and multiple sprinkler heads in the building had paint on them; these were noted as needing correction.

Jul 16, 2024Inspection

Includes follow-up letter dated 09/10/2024 confirming no deficiencies found during that follow-up inspection and that all listed deficiencies from 43890 were corrected.; The document contains a cover letter dated 07/24/2024 and multiple pages of the Statement of Deficiencies report. The facility is required to correct deficiencies within 45 days.

Storing, securing, and accounting for medicationsWAC 388-78A-2260Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Facility failed to ensure medications were locked and secure in resident rooms; unsecured over-the-counter medications observed in rooms of R5, R6, and R2.

Safe storage of supplies and equipmentWAC 388-78A-3100Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Facility failed to secure hazardous cleaning chemicals and supplies in 4 of 4 locations (laundry rooms, dining room, beauty salon).

Infection controlWAC 388-78A-2610Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Facility failed to provide necessary handwashing supplies (soap/paper towels) and staff failed to perform adequate hand hygiene in kitchen and laundry areas.

Other requirementsWAC 388-78A-2040Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Facility failed to ensure fire extinguishers were serviced timely; inspection tags indicated they were due for service in May 2024 and had not been performed.

Food sanitationWAC 388-78A-2305Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Facility failed to follow safe food handling practices including lack of hand hygiene, failure to change gloves between tasks, and use of expired spices.

TuberculosisWAC 388-78A-2483Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Failed to ensure 1 of 4 new staff members (Staff C) was screened for TB with the required two-step skin testing upon hire.

Service agreement planningWAC 388-78A-2130Corrected Aug 30, 2024

Failed to implement a temporary service plan when 1 of 7 sampled residents (R7) had a change in ability to perform ADLs.

Signing negotiated service agreementWAC 388-78A-2150

Failed to have a copy of the two residents' (R7 and R6) signed Negotiated Service Agreements for review.

Background checksWAC 388-78A-2466

Conducted a background check two days after it was required for Staff Q; Staff Q had no records on any background check that was completed.

Monitoring residents' well-beingWAC 388-78A-2120

Failed to place Resident 4 on alert charting when they had physical redness and swelling to their eye.

Jun 8, 2023Inspection
CleanReport

The document states that the Department completed a full inspection and found no deficiencies.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call