Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm and professional administrative staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 32 Google reviews

Email Peninsula Pointe by Cogir to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Peninsula Pointe by Cogir highly. Reviewers highlight: warm and professional administrative staff, beautiful, clean, and well-maintained facilities. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Peninsula Pointe is highly regarded by families for its warm, welcoming atmosphere and an exceptionally professional marketing and nursing staff. While many praise the beautiful facilities and engaging social activities, there are significant, recurring criticisms regarding food quality and the need for increased staffing during nights and weekends.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 35 analyzed
The owner provides highly personalized responses to detailed reviews, often mentioning specific staff members and event details. While many responses are templated, they are customized to reflect the reviewer's specific sentiment and names.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The most negative aspect of this facility is the food which has been a sore subject for most residents. Half the time I have to spend extra money and eat elsewhere because the food in Peninsula Pointe is Lousy.”
“The place is less than a year old and has already fired the director and sales staff. The food is absolutely disgusting - nearly everything is rewarmed frozen food.”
“I visited Peninsula Pointe as a new home for my Mom who was already in memory care, and I am so glad I did. Chris was amazing, showing me around and making me feel comfortable..”
Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division
FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
The report details a complaint investigation conducted on January 15, 2026, regarding several allegations. All four allegations—soiled diapers, facility odors, failure to document incidents, and forging medication logs—were investigated and subsequently found to be unsubstantiated based on staff and resident interviews, and document review.
The report details a complaint investigation conducted on January 15, 2026, regarding several allegations. All four allegations—soiled diapers, facility odors, failure to document incidents, and forging medication logs—were investigated and subsequently found to be unsubstantiated based on staff and resident interviews, and document review.
The investigation substantiated the allegation that facility staff caused bruising to a resident. The primary deficiency cited relates to the resident's right to leave the facility at any time. This finding is considered a Type A deficiency due to the physical injury sustained by the resident.
The investigation substantiated the allegation that facility staff caused bruising to a resident. The primary deficiency cited relates to the resident's right to leave the facility at any time. This finding is considered a Type A deficiency due to the physical injury sustained by the resident.
The facility underwent a Case Management visit on May 14, 2025. The Licensing Program Analyst observed the facility and met with the Executive Director. The report explicitly states that no deficiencies were observed during this visit, and therefore, no citations were issued.
The facility underwent an unannounced annual required visit on March 27, 2025. The general physical plant inspection revealed that the facility was clean, sanitary, and adequately equipped. However, one Type B deficiency was cited regarding staff training records.
The investigation was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that staff were exposing residents to a contagious illness. The allegation was substantiated because the facility was found to be non-compliant with the most recent LAC DPH guidance regarding COVID-19 isolation. Specifically, staff were allowed to return to work within five days of testing positive, which constitutes a Type A deficiency.
Cadence Sl Palos Verdes Llc/sre Dvm, Pv, LLC
JULIUS OSORIO
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
32 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit cogirusa.com
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
The Canterbury
< 1 miContinuing Care · Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Merrill Gardens at Rolling Hills Estates
< 1 miAssisted Living · Rolling Hills, CA
Belmont Village Rancho Palos Verdes
< 1 miAssisted Living · Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
Ivy Park at Palos Verdes
2.1 miAssisted Living · Torrance, CA
Villa Sorrento
3.1 miAssisted Living · Torrance, CA
Silverado Rolling Hills
3.1 miAssisted Living · Torrance, CA