See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid Top Rated

Osborn Health and Rehabilitation

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise highly regarded physical and occupational therapy teams. Still worth an in-person visit.

3333 North Civic Center Plaza, Security Acres · Scottsdale, AZ 85251130 bedsLicensed & Active
5/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
3.4/5

based on 248 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation Nursing Home in Scottsdale, AZ — Street View
Street View

Watch Osborn Health and Rehabilitation

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While Osborn Health and Rehabilitation has a modern facility and a well-regarded therapy team, the frequency of reports regarding neglect and unresponsiveness is a major red flag. If you consider this facility, you must visit unannounced and observe the back wings, not just the front lobby. We strongly recommend having a family member present daily to ensure basic needs like hygiene and medication are met.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

248 reviews on Google
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation presents a stark contrast between its modern, renovated appearance and the quality of care reported by many families. While some residents praise the therapy team and specific staff members, a significant number of reviewers report severe neglect, including unresponsiveness to call lights, poor hygiene, and medication management errors. Families should be aware that experiences appear highly inconsistent, with many reports of understaffing and communication failures.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food2.0Staff5.0Clean4.0Activities6.0Meds2.0MemoryN/AComms3.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Highly regarded physical and occupational therapy teams
  • Modern, clean, and well-maintained facility aesthetics
  • Select individual staff members noted for compassion
  • Helpful administrative and reception staff

Concerns

  • Severe neglect and unresponsiveness to call lights (mentioned by 18 reviewers)
  • Poor hygiene, including patients left in soiled conditions (mentioned by 12 reviewers)
  • Medication administration errors or delays (mentioned by 8 reviewers)
  • Poor food quality and failure to meet dietary restrictions (mentioned by 9 reviewers)
  • Understaffing, particularly on weekends and evenings (mentioned by 6 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2343.8'19(52)4.44.1'21(30)3.43.0'23(23)3.93.4'25(22)2.6'26(19)

Distribution · 206 analyzed

5
126
4
9
3
3
2
4
1
64
17 reviews posted between May 12, 2021May 12, 2021 · 16 were 5-star
16 reviews posted between Apr 17, 2019Apr 17, 2019 · 16 were 5-star
11 reviews posted between Jun 30, 2022Jun 30, 2022 · 11 were 5-star

How They Respond to Reviews

80%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is wonderful to see how much the administration engages with the community through your review responses; how do you typically incorporate family feedback into daily care improvements?
  • 2We are very impressed by the reputation of your physical and occupational therapy teams; could you tell us more about how they work with residents to maintain their mobility?
  • 3What specific protocols do you have in place to ensure call lights are answered promptly and that residents are comfortable and clean throughout the day and night?
  • 4How does the nursing team manage medication schedules to ensure every dietary restriction and dosage timing is strictly followed, especially during evening and weekend shifts?
  • 5Could you describe the dining experience here, specifically how the kitchen manages specialized meal plans and ensures food quality remains consistent?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the immediate process for contacting physicians and ensuring the resident receives urgent care?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The receptionist that worked on 8/26 at 10am was very rude.Customer service was nasty and unpleasant,I will never come to this facility.

Potential customer · 2023☆☆☆☆

The nurses administered ALL her meds at once without waiting until she had taken them and EVERYONE there falsify documentation.

Memory care family member · 2024☆☆☆☆

I was left alone for over two hours when first admitted. I had to use the bedpan as I was not able to get out of bed. After two hours of ringing the bell for help an aide came in and told me I would have to pee the bed because she was so busy she couldn't

Rehab patient · 2025☆☆☆☆
Source: 248 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
0.57hrs
76%
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
4.23hrs
OK
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
52%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
29%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

RN hours are below the national benchmark. RNs handle complex medical needs and medication, so ask about coverage during your visit.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
5/ 5
Better Than Avg

11

measures

Worse Than Avg

3

measures

Mixed Results

3

measures

Long-Stay Residents
🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility38.4%
Worse than Avg
Here
38.4%
US
19.4%
AZ
20.5%
Maricopa
20.6%
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility20.6%
Worse than Avg
Here
20.6%
US
12.1%
AZ
4.0%
Maricopa
3.7%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
15.4%
AZ
11.2%
Maricopa
10.8%
🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility6.5%
Better than Avg
Here
6.5%
US
14.4%
AZ
10.6%
Maricopa
8.5%
🚶

Residents whose walking got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility8.5%
Better than Avg
Here
8.5%
US
15.3%
AZ
13.5%
Maricopa
11.4%
💉

Residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
93.4%
AZ
97.0%
Maricopa
97.7%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
81.8%
AZ
91.3%
Maricopa
93.5%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility96.1%
Better than Avg
Here
96.1%
US
79.7%
AZ
87.3%
Maricopa
89.3%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility1.0%
Better than Avg
Here
1.0%
US
1.6%
AZ
1.1%
Maricopa
1.2%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

3deficiencies
Well below state avg (7.6)
2 complaint-triggered

Families have filed complaints that triggered inspections, including serious concerns about resident abuse and neglect protection that appeared multiple times in 2023-2024. The facility has recurring issues with medication management, resident protection policies, and care planning across surveys spanning 2022-2024, though all deficiencies show correction dates, suggesting the facility addresses problems when identified.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint
1
0755Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

Oct 10, 2024Routine
3
0676Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.

0351Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.

0761Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

Oct 10, 2024Complaint
1
0600Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

Sep 29, 2023Routine
4
0658Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

0757Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.

0372Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

0623Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

Aug 11, 2022Routine
4
0656Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

0759Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

0812Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

0732Minimal · PatternCorrected

Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies

Post nurse staffing information every day.

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

10total
13deficiencies
Dec 9, 2025Other
NFPA 101 FederalCorrected Feb 3, 2026

Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe means of egress out of the emergency exit doors. Failure to provide a clear and unimpeded means of egress could cause harm to the patients and staff in a fire emergency.Â

NFPA 101 FederalCorrected Feb 3, 2026

Based on observation, the facility failed to maintain several doors in the building. Failing to maintain doors in the facility could allow heat and/or smoke to transfer, which will cause harm to the patients and/or staff.

NFPA 101 FederalCorrected Feb 3, 2026

Based on observation, the facility failed to maintain several doors in the building. Failing to maintain doors in the facility could allow heat and/or smoke to transfer, which will cause harm to the patients and/or staff.

Jun 25, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

Investigation of intakes #AZ00244938, SF00134129, AZ00224937, and SF00134130 was conducted on June 25, 2025 through June 25, 2025. No deficiencies were cited.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

The complaint survey was conducted on March 27, 2025 through March 28, 2025 of the following complaint #'s 00122833, 00122835, 00122836, AZ00223236, AZ00221956, AZ00221995, AZ00222085, AZ00222481, AZ00219777 and AZ00218920. There were no deficiencies cited.

Oct 7, 2024Complaint

The recertification survey was conducted October 7, 2024 to October 10, 2024, in conjuction with the investigation of complaint numbers AZ00196895; AZ00195125; AZ00198429; AZ00198539; AZ00198754; AZ00198684; AZ00198753; AZ00198798; AZ00198880; AZ00199602; AZ00200271; AZ00200368; AZ00200442; AZ00200889; AZ00204386; AZ00204854; AZ00205971; AZ00206770; AZ00208818; AZ00217047; and AZ00217222. The following deficiencies were cited:

When medication is stored at a nursing care institution, an administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-421.D.2.Corrected Nov 24, 2024

Based on observation, staff interviews, review of the manufacturer instructions and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one medication in a medication cart was labeled, with an open date. Findings include: An observation of the medication administration was conducted with a Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #147) on October 9, 2024 at 4:23PM. Staff #147 was observed administering a Tuberculin PPD Step 2, which was not marked with an open date. An interview was conducted on October 9, 2024 at 4:30PM with staff #147, who stated that the Tuberculin PDD should have been dated when it was opened, and that this particular medication will have an expiration date of 28 days from opening. A review of the Center of Disease Control guidelines pertaining to 'Mantoux tuberculin skin test,' revealed the expectations to review vial labels to make sure that the vial contains the tuberculin that you wish to choose, and that the label should indicate the expiration date. Revealing that if a vial has been open more than 30 days, or the if the expiration date has passed, then the vial should be thrown away and a new vial should be used. With the expectation that the new vial is expected to reflect the open date and as well as the initials of the individual who opened the vial.

An administrator shall ensure that:R9-10-410.B.3.a.Corrected Nov 24, 2024

Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the Administrator failed to ensure that three residents (resident #272, #273, #369) were provided nursing services to assist in maintaining their highest practicable well-being. In regards to resident #272, findings include: Resident #272 was initially admitted on December 16, 2022 with diagnosis of Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), or Stroke, Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis, Schizophrenia. Resident #272 was discharged on December 30, 2023. A review of a quarterly Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated April 16, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. A review of a progress note created on June 27, 2024 @ 2PM revealed Resident #272's involvement in the incident, indicating that the incident occurred. A review of the intake information for AZ00198684 revealed that the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was submitted on June 27, 2024 at 3:36PM. This review revealed that Resident # 272 and Resident #273 exchanged verbal profanities to each other, indicating resident #272's involvement in the incident. A review of a progress note titled 'Change of Condition' created on June 28, 2023 at 1:04PM revealed that Resident #272 underwent daily monitoring for the next 30 days, following the verbal altercation, indicating that the incident occurred. An interview was conducted on October 9, 2024 at 1:21PM with the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff # 66), who stated the expectations and their understanding of the facilities abuse policy. Staff #66 identified abuse as, "any form of physical, emotional, verbal, sexual, misappropriation, seclusion and neglect.". Staff #66 then stated that the process of reporting and investigating allegations is to report to the Department of Health Services within 2 hours of notification, then they have 5 days to provide the investigation results back to the Department of Health Services, Staff #66 also reported that additional parties of notification include Adult Protective Services, law enforcement, the provider, and any families/Power of Attorney's. Staff #66 stated that the impact of abuse on the residents could include, "the overall psychosocial wellbeing of the resident". Staff #66 then stated that in regards to the incident that took place on July 27, 2023 between Resident #272 and Resident #273, that she could not re-call the incident and would need to review the full investigation notes provided by their predecessor. Staff #66 reported their conclusion of the full investigation notes, and stated that their immediate response was to separate the two residents, to put into effect 'Change of Condition' monitoring, and, to complete medication assessments and psychiatric evaluations for both Resident # 272 and Resident #273. Staff #66 reported that Resident # 272 and Resident #259 refused a room c

An administrator shall ensure that a care plan for a resident:R9-10-414.B.3.b.Corrected Nov 24, 2024

Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for activities of daily living were provided, according to residents' preferences and to meet residents' needs, for Residents #320 and #322. -Regarding Resident #320: Resident #320 was admitted into the facility on October 01, 2024, with diagnoses that included pigmentary retinal dystrophy, sepsis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #320's care plan dated October 01, 2024 revealed that the resident had a focus for an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit, with an intervention in place for "1:1 assistance with meals: Resident is blind". A review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order in place dated October 01, 2024, for "1:1 Assistance with meals; Resident is blind." Review of the Speech Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated October 02, 2024 revealed that the "resident is legally blind" and that the resident requires supervision/ assistance 50-75% of the time at meal time due to swallowing safety. A review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment that was completed on October 02, 2024, revealed Resident #320 had a score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Upon review of the progress notes, a Social Services Summary note dated October 04, 2024, revealed that Resident #320 eats meals with 1:1 staff assist in her room. A Weekly Clinical Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Review note dated October 08, 2024, revealed nursing to provide assist with meals. A follow-up review of the resident's care plan revealed that the care plan had been adjusted. Under the focus of ADLs, the resident still had the intervention in place for "1:1 assistance with meals: Resident is blind". However, under the focus of "4.2% significant weight loss x 5 days", the resident had a new intervention dated October 09, 2024, that "Patient & family would like to encourage resident to eat independently prior to assist". Review of the resident's clinical record revealed there was no evidence of documentation in the progress notes prior to October 10, 2024, regarding updates to Resident #320's status of 1:1 assistance during mealtimes. A Therapy progress note dated October 10, 2024, revealed that "Patient status changed from 1:1 assist to set up for meal times. Patient is able to independently manage meals after set up. Husband prefers to feed wife when he is present mainly at lunch time as this is his daily routine in the home. Patient manages her daily routine with verbal cues". An observation was conducted on October 08, 2024 at 7:56 AM, of Resident #320 in her room. There was no signage outside the room or inside the room indicating that the resident was blind. An interview was conducted at this same time with the resident, who stated that "I don't have central vision, I'm not able to read" and "I can't see anything on

Oct 7, 2024Other

42 CFR 482.41 Nursing Home The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association This is a recertification survey for Medicare under LSC 2012, Chapter 19, Existing Health Care Occupancies The entire facility was surveyed on October 16, 2024. The facility meets the standards, based on acceptance of a plan of correction.

NFPA 101Corrected Jan 14, 2025

Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide automatic sprinkler protection for the roof overhang at the southwest corner of the facility. This overhang is over four feet in width. Failing to provide automatic sprinklers to all areas of the facility could cause harm to residents and/or staff in time of a fire. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2012, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.5.3 Where required by 19.1.6, buildings containing hospitals or limited care facilities shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, unless otherwise permitted by 19.3.5.5.." Chapter 9, Section 9.7.1.1, " Each automatic sprinkler system required by another section of this Code shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems." NFPA 13, 2010 Edition. Chapter 8, Section 8.6.6.1 "The clearance between the deflector and the top of storage shall be 18 in. or greater." (1.) NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems" NFPA 13, Section 8.15.7 Exterior roofs, Canopies, Porte-Cochers, Balconies, Decks or Similar Projections. Section 8.15.7.1 Unless the requirements of 8.15.7.2,8.15.7.3 , or 8.15.7.4 are met sprinklers shall be installed under exterior roofs, canopies,Porte-cocheres, balconies decks, or similar projections exceeding 4 ft in width. Findings include: Observations made while on tour on October 16, 2024, revealed that the roof overhang at the southwest corner of the building was not sprinklered. The overhang was greater than four feet in width and appeared to be constructed of combustible (wood) materials. Management staff acknowledged during the facility tour and exit conference on October 16, 2024, that the roof overhang at the southwest corner of the building was not sprinklered.

Sep 4, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

An onsite complaint survey was conducted on September 4, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00215175. There were no deficiencies cited.

Jul 15, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

The investigtion of complaint AZ00212581 was conducted on 07/15/2024. There were no deficiencies cited.

Mar 24, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

This complaint survey was conducted on March 24, 2024, for the investigation of AZ00207771, and AZ00208022. There were no deficiencies cited.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Osborn Health and Rehabilitation

Organization Type

for profit

Chain Affiliation

Chain Name

The Ensign Group

Chain Size

338 facilities nationwide

Chain avg rating: 3.2/5 · Rank 6 of 328 (Best)

Ownership & Management

Owners

Port, Barry

Individual is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any Adp of the Snf

Key personnel

Sessions, TroyManaging Control - Governing BodySrivastava, VineeManaging Control - Governing BodyPeterson, ForrestOfficer / DirectorBurnam, SoonOfficer / DirectorKeetch, ChadOfficer / Director
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call