Strong Medicare quality ratings; public reviewers often praise highly regarded physical and occupational therapy teams. Still worth an in-person visit.
based on 248 Google reviews

Email Osborn Health and Rehabilitation to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
These current public-data fields deserve follow-up with the facility and the official Medicare record. They are not a clinical risk score or a substitute for an in-person assessment.
No Medicare penalties on record · 2 findings in latest survey
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation has a strong overall Medicare rating. Public reviewers frequently mention: highly regarded physical and occupational therapy teams and modern, clean, and well-maintained facility aesthetics. Review the component ratings and current source records before deciding.
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation presents a stark contrast between its modern, renovated appearance and the quality of care reported by many families. While some residents praise the therapy team and specific staff members, a significant number of reviewers report severe neglect, including unresponsiveness to call lights, poor hygiene, and medication management errors. Families should be aware that experiences appear highly inconsistent, with many reports of understaffing and communication failures.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 206 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The receptionist that worked on 8/26 at 10am was very rude.Customer service was nasty and unpleasant,I will never come to this facility.”
“The nurses administered ALL her meds at once without waiting until she had taken them and EVERYONE there falsify documentation.”
“I was left alone for over two hours when first admitted. I had to use the bedpan as I was not able to get out of bed. After two hours of ringing the bell for help an aide came in and told me I would have to pee the bed because she was so busy she couldn't”
RN hours are below the EveryPlace reference benchmark. RNs handle complex medical needs and medication, so ask about coverage during your visit.
Reference benchmarks (0.75 RN and 4.1 total nursing hours per resident/day) are comparison targets, not current federal minimum requirements.
Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures
11
measures
3
measures
3
measures
Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse
Residents with depression symptoms
Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.
Residents on antipsychotic medication
Residents needing more daily help over time
Residents whose walking got worse
Residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics
US average from Medicare published data
Detailed Medicare record · up to 3-year lookback
Families have filed complaints that triggered inspections, including serious concerns about resident abuse and neglect protection that appeared multiple times in 2023-2024. The facility has recurring issues with medication management, resident protection policies, and care planning across surveys spanning 2022-2024, though all deficiencies show correction dates, suggesting the facility addresses problems when identified.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Smoke Deficiencies
Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Smoke Deficiencies
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Based on observation, the facility failed to maintain several doors in the building. Failing to maintain doors in the facility could allow heat and/or smoke to transfer, which will cause harm to the patients and/or staff.
Based on observation and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe means of egress out of the emergency exit doors. Failure to provide a clear and unimpeded means of egress could cause harm to the patients and staff in a fire emergency.Â
Based on observation, the facility failed to maintain several doors in the building. Failing to maintain doors in the facility could allow heat and/or smoke to transfer, which will cause harm to the patients and/or staff.
Investigation of intakes #AZ00244938, SF00134129, AZ00224937, and SF00134130 was conducted on June 25, 2025 through June 25, 2025. No deficiencies were cited.
The complaint survey was conducted on March 27, 2025 through March 28, 2025 of the following complaint #'s 00122833, 00122835, 00122836, AZ00223236, AZ00221956, AZ00221995, AZ00222085, AZ00222481, AZ00219777 and AZ00218920. There were no deficiencies cited.
The recertification survey was conducted October 7, 2024 to October 10, 2024, in conjuction with the investigation of complaint numbers AZ00196895; AZ00195125; AZ00198429; AZ00198539; AZ00198754; AZ00198684; AZ00198753; AZ00198798; AZ00198880; AZ00199602; AZ00200271; AZ00200368; AZ00200442; AZ00200889; AZ00204386; AZ00204854; AZ00205971; AZ00206770; AZ00208818; AZ00217047; and AZ00217222. The following deficiencies were cited:
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, staff interviews, and policy review, the Administrator failed to ensure that three residents (resident #272, #273, #369) were provided nursing services to assist in maintaining their highest practicable well-being. In regards to resident #272, findings include: Resident #272 was initially admitted on December 16, 2022 with diagnosis of Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA), or Stroke, Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis, Schizophrenia. Resident #272 was discharged on December 30, 2023. A review of a quarterly Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated April 16, 2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. A review of a progress note created on June 27, 2024 @ 2PM revealed Resident #272's involvement in the incident, indicating that the incident occurred. A review of the intake information for AZ00198684 revealed that the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) was submitted on June 27, 2024 at 3:36PM. This review revealed that Resident # 272 and Resident #273 exchanged verbal profanities to each other, indicating resident #272's involvement in the incident. A review of a progress note titled 'Change of Condition' created on June 28, 2023 at 1:04PM revealed that Resident #272 underwent daily monitoring for the next 30 days, following the verbal altercation, indicating that the incident occurred. An interview was conducted on October 9, 2024 at 1:21PM with the Director of Nursing (DON/Staff # 66), who stated the expectations and their understanding of the facilities abuse policy. Staff #66 identified abuse as, "any form of physical, emotional, verbal, sexual, misappropriation, seclusion and neglect.". Staff #66 then stated that the process of reporting and investigating allegations is to report to the Department of Health Services within 2 hours of notification, then they have 5 days to provide the investigation results back to the Department of Health Services, Staff #66 also reported that additional parties of notification include Adult Protective Services, law enforcement, the provider, and any families/Power of Attorney's. Staff #66 stated that the impact of abuse on the residents could include, "the overall psychosocial wellbeing of the resident". Staff #66 then stated that in regards to the incident that took place on July 27, 2023 between Resident #272 and Resident #273, that she could not re-call the incident and would need to review the full investigation notes provided by their predecessor. Staff #66 reported their conclusion of the full investigation notes, and stated that their immediate response was to separate the two residents, to put into effect 'Change of Condition' monitoring, and, to complete medication assessments and psychiatric evaluations for both Resident # 272 and Resident #273. Staff #66 reported that Resident # 272 and Resident #259 refused a room c
Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for activities of daily living were provided, according to residents' preferences and to meet residents' needs, for Residents #320 and #322. -Regarding Resident #320: Resident #320 was admitted into the facility on October 01, 2024, with diagnoses that included pigmentary retinal dystrophy, sepsis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #320's care plan dated October 01, 2024 revealed that the resident had a focus for an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit, with an intervention in place for "1:1 assistance with meals: Resident is blind". A review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order in place dated October 01, 2024, for "1:1 Assistance with meals; Resident is blind." Review of the Speech Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated October 02, 2024 revealed that the "resident is legally blind" and that the resident requires supervision/ assistance 50-75% of the time at meal time due to swallowing safety. A review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment that was completed on October 02, 2024, revealed Resident #320 had a score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Upon review of the progress notes, a Social Services Summary note dated October 04, 2024, revealed that Resident #320 eats meals with 1:1 staff assist in her room. A Weekly Clinical Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Review note dated October 08, 2024, revealed nursing to provide assist with meals. A follow-up review of the resident's care plan revealed that the care plan had been adjusted. Under the focus of ADLs, the resident still had the intervention in place for "1:1 assistance with meals: Resident is blind". However, under the focus of "4.2% significant weight loss x 5 days", the resident had a new intervention dated October 09, 2024, that "Patient & family would like to encourage resident to eat independently prior to assist". Review of the resident's clinical record revealed there was no evidence of documentation in the progress notes prior to October 10, 2024, regarding updates to Resident #320's status of 1:1 assistance during mealtimes. A Therapy progress note dated October 10, 2024, revealed that "Patient status changed from 1:1 assist to set up for meal times. Patient is able to independently manage meals after set up. Husband prefers to feed wife when he is present mainly at lunch time as this is his daily routine in the home. Patient manages her daily routine with verbal cues". An observation was conducted on October 08, 2024 at 7:56 AM, of Resident #320 in her room. There was no signage outside the room or inside the room indicating that the resident was blind. An interview was conducted at this same time with the resident, who stated that "I don't have central vision, I'm not able to read" and "I can't see anything on
Based on observation, staff interviews, review of the manufacturer instructions and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one medication in a medication cart was labeled, with an open date. Findings include: An observation of the medication administration was conducted with a Registered Nurse (RN/Staff #147) on October 9, 2024 at 4:23PM. Staff #147 was observed administering a Tuberculin PPD Step 2, which was not marked with an open date. An interview was conducted on October 9, 2024 at 4:30PM with staff #147, who stated that the Tuberculin PDD should have been dated when it was opened, and that this particular medication will have an expiration date of 28 days from opening. A review of the Center of Disease Control guidelines pertaining to 'Mantoux tuberculin skin test,' revealed the expectations to review vial labels to make sure that the vial contains the tuberculin that you wish to choose, and that the label should indicate the expiration date. Revealing that if a vial has been open more than 30 days, or the if the expiration date has passed, then the vial should be thrown away and a new vial should be used. With the expectation that the new vial is expected to reflect the open date and as well as the initials of the individual who opened the vial.
42 CFR 482.41 Nursing Home The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association This is a recertification survey for Medicare under LSC 2012, Chapter 19, Existing Health Care Occupancies The entire facility was surveyed on October 16, 2024. The facility meets the standards, based on acceptance of a plan of correction.
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide automatic sprinkler protection for the roof overhang at the southwest corner of the facility. This overhang is over four feet in width. Failing to provide automatic sprinklers to all areas of the facility could cause harm to residents and/or staff in time of a fire. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2012, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.5.3 Where required by 19.1.6, buildings containing hospitals or limited care facilities shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, unless otherwise permitted by 19.3.5.5.." Chapter 9, Section 9.7.1.1, " Each automatic sprinkler system required by another section of this Code shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems." NFPA 13, 2010 Edition. Chapter 8, Section 8.6.6.1 "The clearance between the deflector and the top of storage shall be 18 in. or greater." (1.) NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems" NFPA 13, Section 8.15.7 Exterior roofs, Canopies, Porte-Cochers, Balconies, Decks or Similar Projections. Section 8.15.7.1 Unless the requirements of 8.15.7.2,8.15.7.3 , or 8.15.7.4 are met sprinklers shall be installed under exterior roofs, canopies,Porte-cocheres, balconies decks, or similar projections exceeding 4 ft in width. Findings include: Observations made while on tour on October 16, 2024, revealed that the roof overhang at the southwest corner of the building was not sprinklered. The overhang was greater than four feet in width and appeared to be constructed of combustible (wood) materials. Management staff acknowledged during the facility tour and exit conference on October 16, 2024, that the roof overhang at the southwest corner of the building was not sprinklered.
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on September 4, 2024 for the investigation of intake # AZ00215175. There were no deficiencies cited.
The investigtion of complaint AZ00212581 was conducted on 07/15/2024. There were no deficiencies cited.
This complaint survey was conducted on March 24, 2024, for the investigation of AZ00207771, and AZ00208022. There were no deficiencies cited.
Osborn Health and Rehabilitation
for profit
The Ensign Group
342 facilities nationwide
Chain avg rating: 3.2/5 · Rank 1 of 328 (Highest rating)
Owners
Port, Barry
Individual is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any Adp of the Snf
Key personnel
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Medicare Care Compare
Official Medicare quality ratings, inspections & staffing data
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
248 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit osbornhealth.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Ocotillo Place
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale
< 1 miNursing Home · Scottsdale, AZ
Haven of Scottsdale
< 1 miNursing Home · Scottsdale, AZ
The Springs of Scottsdale
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale Heritage Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
7308 E Virginia Avenue Operator, LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ