See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Jackson Creek Senior Living

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight warm, compassionate, and attentive staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

16601 Jackson Creek Pkwy, Monument, CO 80132110 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
4.8/5

based on 181 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Jackson Creek Senior Living

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Jackson Creek is highly regarded for its beautiful environment and engaging activities, making it a strong choice for residents who are relatively independent. However, families of residents requiring high levels of medical or physical care should conduct a thorough tour and ask specific questions about staffing ratios and the facility's response protocols to medical emergencies.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

181 reviews on Google
Jackson Creek Senior Living is widely praised for its beautiful, clean, and modern facility, with many families highlighting the compassionate and attentive staff. While the majority of reviews are glowing, some families have reported significant concerns regarding understaffing, inconsistent care for residents with higher needs, and occasional communication failures regarding waitlists and medical support.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food8.0Staff8.0Clean10.0Activities9.0Meds5.0Memory7.0Comms6.0Value8.0

Strengths

  • Warm, compassionate, and attentive staff
  • Clean, modern, and well-maintained facility
  • Engaging activities and social events
  • Welcoming and home-like atmosphere

Concerns

  • Understaffing and overworked care partners (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Inconsistent or poor quality of care for high-needs residents (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Communication issues regarding waitlists and administrative processes (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'18(1)'20(1)'22(18)'24(18)'26(31)

Distribution · 123 analyzed

5
116
4
0
3
1
2
2
1
4

How They Respond to Reviews

93%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is wonderful to see how clean and modern the facility looks; how do you ensure this high standard of maintenance is kept up across all 110 resident areas?
  • 2We noticed how much the management engages with the community online; how does that same level of communication extend to families regarding daily care updates?
  • 3With such a vibrant social calendar, how do you ensure that residents with different mobility levels or higher care needs can fully participate in the daily activities?
  • 4How do you manage staffing levels during late-night or weekend shifts to ensure every resident receives attentive, one-on-one care?
  • 5In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the specific protocol for notifying the family and coordinating with outside medical professionals?
  • 6Since the atmosphere here feels so much like a home, how do you balance the professional care requirements with maintaining that warm, social environment for the residents?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff at Jackson Creek was amazing in every way - the chef brought a cart of snacks and drinks to her room daily during her last few days, the nursing staff was so kind and gentle with her.

Long-term resident's family · 2019★★☆☆☆

My mother moved into the memory care unit in January 2022 and the staff has been unbelievably supportive, loving, patient, attentive and encouraging. The bill has been EXACTLY what I expected, no surprises or hidden fees.

Memory care family member · 2022★★★★★

My mother has lived at Jackson Creek for two years, and based on our experience, it is a wonderful place—as long as the resident does not require actual care. Last year, my mother broke her ankle on the stairs at the facility. What followed was extremely frustrating.

Resident's family · 2025★★☆☆☆
Source: 181 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

8total
4deficiencies
Feb 17, 2026Complaint
N/A0000, 0668, 2214 and 1 more

A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO41490, was completed on 2/17/26. Deficiencies were cited. Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to implement a policy and procedure for an effective information management system that includes a method of integration of paper-based and electronic health records (EHR) that allowed effective continuity of care, including effective management for capturing, reporting, processing, storing, and retrieving care/service data and information, affecting 100 current residents.Findings Include:The residence' s "Record Keeping" policy and procedure dated 7/2025 read in part: "This community will maintain a record of all assisted living services established for each of its residents. The community must maintain and preserve all resident records in original, microfilm, electronic, or other similar form, for a period of at least five years from date of resident' s discharge. ... All records must be available for examination by responsible party of the state licensing agency."An interview on 2/17/26 with Staff #2 at 8:35 a.m. revealed that the new corporate owner of the r.. Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to maintain complete former resident records for at least three years following the termination of the resident' s stay for Former Resident #9 (FR#9), affecting 100 current residents.Findings Include:The residence' s "Record Keeping" policy and procedure dated 7/2025 read in part: "This community will maintain a record of all assisted living services established for each of its residents. The community must maintain and preserve all resident records in original, microfilm, electronic, or other similar form, for a period of at least five years from date of resident' s discharge. ... All records must be available for examination by responsile party of the state licensing agency."In an interview with the administrator at 9:35 a.m., she explained that nearly all files dated before 1/26/26 were not retained by the new corporate owner as agreed upon, adding, "I tried to save some stuff".The health information record (HIR) for FR#9 was requested from the administrator on 2/17/26 at a.. Based on records review and interviews, the residence failed to retain for three years following an employee' s separation from employment, including the reasons for the separation, for Former Staff #4 (FS#4), affecting 100 current residents.Findings Include:In an interview with the administrator at 9:35 a.m., she explained that nearly all files dated before 1/26/26 were not retained by the new corporate owner as agreed upon, adding, "I tried to save some stuff".On 2/17/26 at approximately 2:00 p.m., the personnel file for FS#4 was requested from the administrator and not received.On 2/17/26 at approximately 2:00 p.m., the administrator confirmed that FS#4 was employed with the residence a year ago. She stated that her personnel file was lost when the residence was purchased by the new corporate owner on 1/26/26.

Feb 17, 2026Other
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

May 8, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Mar 18, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Dec 20, 2024Complaint
N/A0000, 0540, 0720 and 2 more

A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO35683, #CO35684, #CO36563 and #CO38759 was completed on 12/23/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure each qualified medication administration person (QMAP) accurately documented each medication administration at the time the event was completed for each resident, affecting two of six sample residents (#11 and #12).Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence' s Medication Administration policy, dated 8/10/23, read in part: "The administration of medication shall be documented at the time of administration."2. Record ReviewResident #12 was admitted to the residence on 12/17/19.A written practitioner' s order, dated 10/23/24, directed the residence to administer Cymbalta 30 mg daily. However, the November 2024 medication administration record (MAR) contained a blank space on 11/2/24.Additional deficient pra.. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure the administrator complied with all applicable state regulations to help prevent the possible development and transmission of Norovirus/Gastroenteritis and Coronavirus (COVID-19). Additionally, the residence failed to follow recommended contingency staffing protocols for their local health department (LHD), affecting 108 current residents. (Cross-reference S1130)Specifically, the residence failed to follow the LHD guidelines for reporting norovirus/gastroenteritis and collect specimens from different ill individuals. Specifically, the residence did not implement its communicable disease and infection prevention policy. The residence organized a line list of 21 residents and 13 staff members who experienced sympto.. Based on record review, and interview, the residence failed to determine appropriate routine staffing levels, and thus failed to meet requirements outlined in the resident care plan, affecting three of 108 current residents (#6, #9, #14).Findings include:1. Resident #14 was admitted to the residence on 1/14/24 with a diagnosis of dementia. A level of care evaluation, dated 1/14/24 read in part that Resident #14 did not resist care and that staff would provide maximum assistance daily with dressing, grooming, and toileting. 2. InterviewsOn 12/20/24 at approximately 5:00 p.m. Confidential Staff #9 stated that due to not having appropriate staffing levels, there were frequent times during the night and morning shifts when care needs would be missed or put off until late morning. She stated that several t.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.12.5 The assisted living residence shall have a policy and procedure regarding when a practitioner' s assessment of a resident is appropriate. At a minimum, the assisted living residence shall contact the resident' s primary practitioner when any of the following circumstances occur and follow the practitioner' s recommendation regarding further action.(D) The resident has known exposure to a communicable disease.

Mar 26, 2024Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 3/26/24 for all previous deficiencies cited on 1/4/24. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Jan 4, 2024Complaint
N/A0000, 0664, 1468 and 3 more

A relicensure survey with complaint #CO28264, #CO28805, #CO30927, #CO32211, #CO34376 was completed on 1/4/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration except for those medications which a resident self-administers, affecting one of 15 sample residents (#6).Findings include:1. Residence policyThe residence' s Medication Management policy, dated 8/10/23, read in part, the residence would administer medications as ordered by a practitioner.2. Resident #6 was admitted on 3/12/22 with diagnoses including overactive bladder, actinic keratosis, spinal stenosis, complete traumatic amputation at knee level, arthritis, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. A written practitioner' s order.. Based on observation, interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure a qualified medication administration person(QMAP) applied nationally recognized protocols for basic infection control when preparing and administering medications, affecting five of fifteen sample residents (#4, #5, #12, #13, #15 ).Findings Include:1. Reference and Residence Policya. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Introduction to Hand Hygiene (2021), health care providers should wash their hands before touching a patient, after touching a patient or the patient' s immediate environment, and immediately after glove removal. Centers for Disease Control and Preventi.. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to ensure the medication administration record (MAR) documented accurate information, including the date and time of administration, refusals, and resident responses to medications; all prescribed "as needed" (PRN) medications; the resident' s room location; the date the order was received, affecting five of fifteen sample residents (#1, #6, #11, #12, #14). Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence ' s Medication Management policy, dated 8/10/23, read in part, Procedure: Audit the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records, controlled substance list, medication error reports, and .. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to ensure personnel file included written documentation of orientation and training for three of three sample staff (#1-#3), affecting 95 current residents.Findings include:On 1/4/23 at 9:30 a.m., the personnel files for Staff #1, Staff #2, and Staff #3 were requested from the administrator. Review of the personnel files for Staff #1-#3 revealed no written documentation of completion of orientation and training.On 1/4/23 at 3:08 p.m., the regional nurse stated she was aware of the requirement to have documentation of completion of orientation and training for personnel in their personnel files. She mentioned this had been an ongoi.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.14.27 No stock medications shall be stored or administered by qualified medication administration persons. (A) All over-the-counter medication prescribed for administration shall be labeled or marked with the individual resident' s full name.

May 9, 2023Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call