Ivy Park at Palo Alto

The complaint investigation found the allegation regarding incorrect medication administration to be substantiated. The primary deficiency cited relates to the failure to ensure the resident received the correct prescribed medication upon return from the skilled nursing facility. Immediate corrective action is required to prevent recurrence of medication errors.

This report details a complaint investigation conducted regarding resident care plan adherence, observation of health changes, and medication assistance. Although allegations were listed, the final findings state that there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove any alleged violations occurred. No deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22.

This report details a complaint investigation conducted regarding resident care plan adherence, observation of health changes, and medication assistance. Although allegations were listed, the final findings state that there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove any alleged violations occurred. No deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22.

This report details a complaint investigation conducted regarding resident care plan adherence, observation of health changes, and medication assistance. Although allegations were listed, the final findings state that there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove any alleged violations occurred. No deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22.

The unannounced case management visit identified a significant deficiency regarding incident reporting for a resident (R1). Specifically, the facility failed to submit required incident reports for multiple falls and hospitalizations that occurred between August 31 and October 17, 2024. This failure to report poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to the resident.

This report details a complaint investigation conducted following an unannounced visit. The allegations regarding inadequate care, failure to observe changes, and medication supervision were reviewed. The department ultimately determined that there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, resulting in the allegations being unsubstantiated.