See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Good Samaritan Society -Loveland Village

Limited public data on Good Samaritan Society -Loveland Village. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

2101 S Garfield Ave, Loveland, CO 8053760 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
3.9/5

based on 37 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Good Samaritan Society -Loveland Village Assisted Living in Loveland, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Good Samaritan Society -Loveland Village

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

This facility is highly regarded for its independent living lifestyle and active community, making it a great choice for those seeking an engaging retirement environment. However, families should be cautious regarding the healthcare and rehab units; we strongly recommend observing the nursing staff's interactions and asking for a detailed plan on how medication management and staff professionalism are monitored.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

37 reviews on Google
Good Samaritan Society - Loveland Village is a large, established campus that receives high praise from independent living residents for its active community, amenities, and friendly staff. However, the facility faces significant criticism regarding its healthcare and rehabilitation wings, where families have reported issues with staff professionalism, inconsistent nursing care, and poor food quality.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food4.0Staff6.0Clean7.0Activities9.0Meds2.0MemoryN/AComms4.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Active, engaging independent living community
  • Well-maintained, beautiful campus grounds
  • Variety of amenities and social activities
  • Long-tenured, friendly staff in independent living

Concerns

  • Unprofessional or rude staff behavior (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • Poor food quality and lack of variety (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Inconsistent or poor nursing care in rehab/healthcare (mentioned by 3 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2341.0'18(1)4.33.0'21(4)2.01.0'23(4)3.84.5'25(22)5.0'26(6)

Distribution · 67 analyzed

5
47
4
2
3
0
2
4
1
14

How They Respond to Reviews

13%response rate

This facility rarely responds to reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1We've heard wonderful things about how active and engaging the community is; could you tell us more about the specific social activities and amenities available for residents?
  • 2The campus grounds look beautiful; how often are the outdoor spaces and gardens utilized for resident events?
  • 3How does the team ensure consistent and clear communication with family members regarding a resident's daily well-being?
  • 4Could you walk us through your process for medication management to ensure everything is handled accurately and timely?
  • 5What is the protocol for handling medical emergencies or changes in care needs during the overnight hours?
  • 6We'd love to hear more about the dining experience, specifically regarding how much variety is offered in the daily menus?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

It truly is a village with so many conveniences. Exercise classes, country store, restaurant, beautiful walkable campus, ponds for fishing, on campus PT if needed, hairdresser and massage, 24 hour security staff and more.

Independent living resident · 2025★★★★★

My brother has resided in independent living, had 3 stays in rehab after surgeries, and is now in healthcare at Good Samaritan in Loveland. All the staff have been wonderful to work with and he is given tender, loving and very competent care.

Family member of long-term resident · 2019★★★★★

The staff was very welcoming and informative. The campus, although 'older,' was clean and well maintained. There was a feeling of longevity with the staff and coming from a place that was a revolving door of caregivers, that was VERY appealing.

Family member of new residents · 2025★★★★★
Source: 37 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

2total
2deficiencies
May 7, 2025Follow-up
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 5/7/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 11/13/24. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Nov 13, 2024Other
N/A0000, 0001, 1068 and 1 more

A relicensure survey was completed on 11/13/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to evaluate a resident transferred to another healthcar entity prior to readmission, affecting 47 current residentsFindings include.1. Record reviewA hospital discharge note dated 11/12/24 revealed Resident #1 was hospitalized from 11/10/24 to 11/12/24. The hospital discharge note further read that Resident #1 required contact isolation precautions due to a diagnosis of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).On 11/13/24, further review of Resident #1 ' s records revealed no documented evidence that an assessment was completed by the residence prior to her re-admission into the residence on 11/12/24, though a progress note dated 11/12/24 indicated Resident #1 was not at her baseline after she returned from the hospital and that she continued to manifest symptoms of a potential infection. 2. InterviewOn 11/13/24 at 2:00 p.m., the administrator stated that the hospital contacted a staff member at the residence and informed them that Resident #.. Chapter 2, Part 12.2.2 B (4) Each facility shall assign at least one (1) staff member responsible for the site management of the facility' s Infection Prevention and Control Program and training. This individual shall be responsible for the following: Ensuring the facility complies with Department reporting requirements related to infectious diseasesBased on observation, record review and interview, the residence failed to report the outbreak of an infectious disease according to the department' s reporting requirements, affecting 47 current residents.Findings include:1. ObservationOn 11/13/24 at 7:45 a.m., a set of personal protective equipment (PPE) including gowns, gloves, shoe covers and cleaning supplies was observed hanging by the side of the medication cabinet in the medication room.2. Record reviewThe residence emergency response document on infectious disease outbreak read in part: "A sudden rise in the number of cases of a disease, sometimes a single case of a highly infectious disease is cons.. THIS SECTION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSENo response is required.The residence was advised to review and maintain regulations found in 6 CCR 1011-1 Chapter 714.31 The administrator and the QMAP supervisor shall, on a quarterly basis, audit the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records, controlled substance list, medication error reports, and medication disposalrecords. Any irregularities shall be investigated and resolved. The results of the audits shall be documented androutinely included as part of the assisted living residence' s Quality Management Program assessment and review.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call