Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm, compassionate, and attentive staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 41 Google reviews

Email Edmonds Landing Assisted Living Community to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Edmonds Landing Assisted Living Community highly. Reviewers highlight: warm, compassionate, and attentive staff, clean and well-maintained facility. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Edmonds Landing is consistently praised for its warm, compassionate staff and welcoming, community-focused atmosphere. Families frequently highlight the facility's cleanliness, engaging events, and the helpfulness of the management team during the transition process.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 47 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff went out of their way to give her the extra care she required as she healed, and the positive support she got was just what she needed while she was recuperating.”
“The facility was lovely, the food excellent and the staff was very attentive and caring. A special thank you to Jennifer for making the transition so seamless.”
“Edmonds landing was far and away the best amenities and care for the price point. Which really surprised me for how well located and lovely it is.”
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
Approval Status: Disapproved. Next inspection scheduled on or after 1/16/2026.
Fire alarm has troubles due to ongoing replacement work; facility must provide documentation on a project schedule for the replacement.
Facility is unable to provide documentation for the annual 90-minute power test for the emergency lights.
Annual inspection report had deficiencies from 7/14/2025; unable to provide documentation for 3-year dry system full flow trip test; unable to provide documentation for annual back flow forward flow test.
There are two separate documents: one is a follow-up letter dated 12/03/2025 indicating no current deficiencies, and the other is the initial Statement of Deficiencies (Compliance Determination 66151) from 10/14/2025.; The document package includes a cover letter, a Statement of Deficiencies, and Plan/Attestation pages. The finding for WAC 388-78A-2360 is inferred from the text on page 14 of 17 regarding assessment timelines.
The facility failed to notify the department in writing within 10 calendar days regarding a change in the facility's administrator.
Failed to follow sanitizing and handwashing protocols; failed to date-mark perishable food; food storage temperatures were in the danger zone.
The facility failed to complete full assessments within 14 days of admission for Residents 1, 7, 8, and 9.
Failed to complete a full assessment within 14 days of move-in for 4 of 4 sampled residents.
Failed to ensure 2 of 3 pets had up-to-date immunizations and veterinarian certification of being free of diseases transmittable to humans.
Failed to ensure 2 of 6 sampled staff received facility orientation and 3 of 6 sampled staff completed required dementia/mental health training.
The facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents with video cameras in their apartments had completed evaluations and signed consent forms for the equipment.
Hazardous chemicals (cleaning supplies) were stored in unsecured cabinets accessible to residents with cognitive impairment.
Failed to ensure 1 of 6 staff members was screened for tuberculosis within three days of employment.
A follow-up inspection on 09/03/2024 determined that the deficiency cited on 06/27/2024 was corrected.
The facility failed to maintain a Respiratory Protection Program (RPP) as required; 6 of 18 caregiving staff had expired N95 respirator fit tests.
Follow-up inspection on 06/13/2024 found no deficiencies; previous citations from 03/26/2024 and 05/15/2024 were reviewed.; The document references a previously cited deficiency for safe storage on 10/06/2022.
Facility failed to identify and secure hazardous chemicals in common areas; housekeeping carts and cabinets under sinks were found unlocked and unattended, containing cleaning agents like bleach and disinfectants.
Administrator failed to complete a national fingerprint background check.
Facility failed to ensure a national fingerprint background check was processed for the Administrator.
Failure to properly label/date food, maintain sanitary juice dispensers, and ensure valid food handler permits for staff.
Facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 staff members completed the required one-step tuberculin skin test within three days of hire.
Failure to complete an assessment addressing the safety needs of a resident using a medical side rail.
Failure to include monitoring and intervention plans for residents on blood-thinning medications or specific safety plans for private caregivers.
Failure to obtain annual signatures on Negotiated Service Agreements for 3 of 8 sampled residents.
This is an uncorrected citation previously cited on March 26, 2024. A civil fine of $300.00 was imposed.
The licensee failed to ensure a national fingerprint background check (NFBC) for one staff member was completed.
Follow-up inspection on 05/22/2024 found no deficiencies regarding compliance determination 41443 and 37350.
Facility failed to implement the Negotiated Service Agreement for one resident during a transfer, resulting in a fall and hip fracture because staff did not use a required transfer belt.
Follow-up inspection on 05/22/2024 confirmed no deficiencies for this determination.
Facility failed to implement the Negotiated Service Agreement for one resident who required a transfer belt; staff did not use the belt during a transfer, resulting in a fall and hip fracture.
A separate follow-up letter dated 08/05/2024 confirms that this facility subsequently met all licensing requirements and the cited deficiencies were corrected.
Facility failed to pass the Washington State Patrol Office of State Fire Marshal (OSFM) follow-up Fire and Life Safety Inspection (LSI), specifically lacking documentation for annual 90-minute emergency light power tests.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
41 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit cogirusa.com
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Rosewood Courte Memory Care Community
1.3 miAssisted Living · Edmonds, WA
Sunrise of Edmonds
1.3 miAssisted Living · Edmonds, WA
Pine Ridge Post Acute
2.1 miNursing Home · Edmonds, WA
Edmonds Post Acute
2.4 miNursing Home · Edmonds, WA
Cedar Creek Memory Care Community
2.4 miAssisted Living · Edmonds, WA
Cogir of Edmonds
2.4 miAssisted Living · Edmonds, WA