Community Living (yakima County)
Limited public data on Community Living (yakima County). Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 10 Google reviews
Watch Community Living (yakima County)
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit Community Living (yakima County) in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
10 reviews on Google“[MISMATCH] Google reviews appear to be for a retail/shopping, not this facility. Review data may be inaccurate.”
How They Respond to Reviews
Questions for Your Tour
- 1Since this is a supported living environment, how much independence do residents typically maintain in their daily routines?
- 2What kind of social activities or community outings do you organize to help residents stay connected with the Yakima County area?
- 3How do the staff members assist with personal care or daily tasks if a resident's needs begin to change?
- 4Can you walk me through the protocol for handling a medical emergency or a sudden change in health during the night?
- 5What is the process for residents to communicate any specific needs or concerns to the management team?
- 6How do you foster a sense of community and 'living together' among the residents here?
Personalized based on this facility's data
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
Aug 4, 2025Investigation
Investigation involved an allegation of abuse where staff barricaded a client in the living room with a dresser. The staff member responsible was terminated. This was noted as a repeat deficiency from 08/04/2023.
Provider failed to implement policies by restricting a client from leaving their living room using a dresser as a physical barrier, violating client rights.
Provider failed to prevent the use of unauthorized restrictive procedures (barricading a client with a dresser) which was not listed in any support plans.
Feb 26, 2025Investigation
Follow-up inspection on 04/22/2025 indicated that deficiencies for WAC 388-101D-0405, 388-101D-0405-1, 388-101D-0405-1-a, and 388-101D-0405-1-a-vi were corrected.
Provider failed to complete a functional assessment and positive behavior support plan including interventions for prevention of assaults or injuries to others for a client whose person-centered service plan indicated such support was necessary.
Feb 26, 2025Investigation
References complaint numbers 146912 and 148988. Investigation documentation indicates a failure to include assessments or interventions for the prevention of assaults in the client's functional behavioral assessment.
Provider failed to complete a functional assessment that included assault or injury to others for one client, resulting in staff not having instruction to prevent such behaviors despite the client's person-centered service plan indicating a need for extensive behavior supports.
Oct 9, 2024Investigation
There is also a follow-up letter dated 04/23/2025 stating that the deficiency for WAC 388-101D-0210 was corrected.
The provider failed to update and implement an Individual Instruction and Support Plan (IISP) for a client who fell while being transported in a wheelchair because staff failed to secure the required lap belt.
Oct 9, 2024Investigation
The complaint investigation originated from an incident on 08/17/2024 involving a fall during transport. Staff admitted to forgetting to latch the wheelchair lap belt.
The provider failed to update and implement an Individual Instruction and Support Plan (IISP) to include the use of a wheelchair lap belt. Consequently, staff failed to secure the belt, leading to the client falling out of the wheelchair and sustaining a fractured finger and bruising.
Feb 14, 2024Investigation
Follow-up inspection on 02/14/2024 confirmed all deficiencies were corrected. Initial investigation was related to an allegation of an unanticipated death.; Plan of correction submitted by Randy Hauck, ED on 12/7/2023.
Provider failed to implement emergency policy and procedures for a client, resulting in a delay in recognizing a medical emergency and accessing 911 services, which contributed to the client's death.
Provider failed to implement 2-person staff assistance for a medical appointment and failed to revise/update the IISP regarding a client's chronic bowel condition and prescribed lactose-free diet.
Oct 10, 2023Inspection
Several deficiencies are noted as repeat deficiencies from previous inspections.; Client 12 also exhibited safety risks regarding an inoperable smoke detector and lack of documented intervention for burning behaviors.
Provider failed to immediately report alleged abuse or neglect for five sampled clients (Client 8, 9, 11, 13, and 14) to the Complaint Resolution Unit (CRU).
Provider failed to provide required health support, resulting in a duplicate medication dose for Client 8, excessive protein consumption for Client 11, and incomplete fluid intake tracking for Client 12.
Provider failed to complete a functional assessment for Client 12 within 45 days of identifying new target behaviors including burning property, trespassing/theft, and evading two-hour staff checks.
Provider failed to ensure a safe home environment; Client 11 had food safety issues and Client 12 had an inoperable smoke detector and fire hazards in the home.
Provider failed to implement and document support plans for Clients 11 and 12, specifically regarding two-hour checks, medication, and safety plans.
Provider failed to document required Refusal Plans for Client 12 regarding home cleanliness, safety with sharps, and the use of a smoke detector.
Provider failed to ensure clients' rights regarding privacy (removal of doors/curtains for Client 8), access to food (Client 11), and personal property (Client 14) were respected.
Provider failed to ensure the Positive Behavior Support Plan (PBSP) was clear and implemented regarding a restrictive sharps-securing program; staff were unsure which items required locking and a sharp tool was found unsecured.
Oct 10, 2023Inspection
There are multiple files provided. The first file is a follow-up letter dated 03/14/2024 confirming previous deficiencies (31223) were corrected. The subsequent pages (2-12) are the original Statement of Deficiencies for compliance determination 31223.; The document also contains observations regarding Client 11 (lack of documentation for 2-hour checks) and Client 12 (inoperable smoke detector, fire damage to furniture/walls, and missing medications due to staffing issues), though the cited WAC deficiencies specifically focus on the Functional Assessment and Positive Behavior Support Plan requirements for Client 12.
Provider failed to ensure clients' rights were considered; interior doors were removed without consent, access to certain foods was restricted, and personal items were hidden by staff.
Provider failed to ensure safe/healthy environment for two clients, resulting in food safety concerns, fire safety concerns (non-operating smoke detector), and unattended household environment.
Provider failed to ensure requirements for IISP development/implementation, including lack of documentation for required support checks and failure to follow safety plans.
Provider failed to complete a functional assessment for Client 12 within 45 days of identifying new target behaviors including burning property, trespassing, theft, and misuse of sharps.
Provider failed to immediately report alleged abuse or neglect of five sampled clients to the Complaint Resolution Unit (CRU).
Provider failed to ensure the Positive Behavior Support Plan was clear and consistently implemented; staff were unsure of policy, and sharp objects were found unsecured in the home despite the plan.
Provider failed to ensure health service supports for three clients, resulting in medication errors, excessive protein consumption, and lack of tracking for fluid intake.
Provider failed to ensure requirements for client refusal were met regarding physical/safety services, including lack of Refusal Plans and failure to notify case manager.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
10 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Fieldstone Memory Care
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yakima, WA
Fieldstone Orchardwest
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yakima, WA
Hillcrest Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yakima, WA
Brookdale Yakima
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yakima, WA
Crescent Health Care
< 1 miNursing Home · Yakima, WA
Chandler House
< 1 miAssisted Living · Yakima, WA