See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted LivingMedicaid

Brookdale Greeley

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight warm, welcoming staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

1999 38th Ave, Greeley, CO 8063451 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
4.5/5

based on 33 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Brookdale Greeley Assisted Living in Greeley, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Brookdale Greeley

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Brookdale Greeley is highly regarded for its warm, home-like environment and attentive care team, making it a strong candidate for those prioritizing resident happiness. However, because some families have noted inconsistencies during management transitions, we recommend asking specifically about current leadership stability and how they handle staff turnover.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

33 reviews on Google
Brookdale Greeley is frequently praised for its warm, home-like atmosphere and attentive staff who are described as caring and professional. Families consistently highlight the cleanliness of the facility and the variety of activities provided, though there are isolated reports of management-related dissatisfaction and unprofessionalism.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food9.0Staff9.0Clean10.0Activities9.0Meds9.0MemoryN/AComms8.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Warm, welcoming staff
  • Clean and well-maintained facility
  • Engaging resident activities
  • Home-like environment

Concerns

  • Management turnover leading to inconsistent care standards (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2344.82018(5)5.02019(1)3.72021(6)5.02022(2)3.72023(3)5.02024(7)4.62025(10)

Distribution · 34 analyzed

5
29
4
1
3
0
2
0
1
4

How They Respond to Reviews

9%response rate

This facility rarely responds to reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1With your focus on a home-like environment, how do you ensure that staff members build consistent, long-term relationships with residents to maintain a stable care experience?
  • 2I noticed your activities are highly praised; could you walk me through a few of the most popular events that residents look forward to each week?
  • 3Given that the facility is intimate with 51 residents, how do you manage communication with families to ensure we stay updated on any changes in care or management?
  • 4What protocols are in place to ensure that the high standards of cleanliness and maintenance I’ve heard about are consistently upheld across all shifts?
  • 5How does your team handle medical emergencies or urgent health needs during evening and weekend hours when administrative staff might be off-site?
  • 6Since you have a very welcoming atmosphere, how do you help new residents integrate into the community and form social connections during their first few weeks?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff is AMAZING. They were so helpful on accommodating us for this move and bending over backwards to get the move accomplished on this date.

Family member · 2021★★★★★

From medical needs, medication, to compassionate care, I felt I was in good hands. Meals were very good and had a variety of choices.

Family member · 2024★★★★★

The communication I get from the whole team, led by Shari - has been timely, professional and above all caring.

Family member · 2025★★★★★
Source: 33 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

5total
4deficiencies
Apr 2, 2026Follow-up
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 4/2/26 for all previous deficiencies cited on 12/16/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Apr 2, 2026Follow-up
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 4/2/26 for all previous deficiencies cited on 12/16/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Dec 16, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Dec 16, 2025Other
N/A0000, 0640, 0914 and 4 more

A relicensure survey was completed on 12/16/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interviews and record review, the residence failed to ensure that each staff member met the dementia training requirements in 7.9 (B), affecting 33 current residents. Findings include:Personnel files for the resident care coordinator and Staff #3, #4 provided by the administrator, revealed no evidence that each staff member had completed the initial four hour dementia training.Review of resident records revealed Resident #1 mild cognitive impairment had a diagnosis of dementia. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia, and Resident #3 had a dia.. Based on observation and interview, the residence failed to ensure resident rooms occupied by smokers had fire resistant wastebaskets along with fire resistant waste baskets in the designated smoking area outside the residence, affecting 33 current residents. Findings include: On 12/16/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., the administrator verbally stated there was one resident who smoked cigarettes at the residence.An environmental tour of the residents' room revealed no fire-resistant wastebasket within the room. The outdoor environment revealed the cigarette wastebaske.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures which included all required elements, affecting 33 current residents.Findings include:The residence' s emergency plan failed to include the following: policies that address a pre-determined means of communicating with residents, families, staff and other providers. The emergency plan also failed to include storage and preservation of medications. Lastly, the plan of protection and transfer of health information as needed to meet.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to have policies and procedures to ensure the continuation of care to all residents for 72 hours following any emergency, affecting 33 current residents.Findings include:On 12/16/25 at 8:00 a.m., a 72-hour Continuation of Care policy and procedure was requested; however, the residence did not have one included in their policy. On 12/16/25 at approximately 4:00 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware that a 72-hour plan was included in the residence' s emergency policies. She acknowledged the need for th.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to identify the highest potential risk for its residence and hold routine drills to facilitate staff and resident response to that risk, affecting 33 current residents. Findings include: The residence' s emergency plan failed to include a plan to identify its highest potential risk for its residence and hold routine drills to facilitate staff and resident response to that risk.On 12/16/25 at 8:00 a.m., emergency drill documentation was requested. However, after review, the drills that were being held were meetings with the staff a.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.14.33 (U1612) Practitioner and legal representatives notified if: Decline in baseline Resident has pattern of refusal Repetitive requests for PRNs Reaction to medications Emergent medication for angina administered Medication errors that affect the resident14.21 (U1568) Residence complying with orders.14.31 The ad..

Dec 16, 2025Other
N/A0000, 0808, 0812 and 3 more

A recertification survey was completed on 12/16/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interviews and record review, the facility (residence) failed to ensure that each staff member met the dementia training requirements, affecting 33 current members (residents). Findings include:Personnel files for Staff #3, #4 and the resident care coordinator provided by the administrator, revealed no evidence that each staff member had completed the initial four hour dementia training.Review of resident records revealed Resident #1 mild cognitive impairment had a diagnosis of dementia. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia, and Resident #3 had a diagnosis of dementia. On 12/17/25 at approximately 3:20.m., the administrator stated she was unaware of the requ.. Based on record review and interview the facility (residence) failed to identify the highest potential risk for its residence and hold routine drills to facilitate staff and resident response to that risk, affecting 33 current members (residents). Findings include: The residence' s emergency plan failed to include a plan to identify its highest potential risk for its residence and hold routine drills to facilitate staff and resident response to that risk.On 12/16/25 at 8:00 a.m., emergency drill documentation was requested. However, after review, the drills that were being held were meetings with the staff and not simulated drills to track the response to the risk. On 12/6/25 at approximately .. Based on record review and interview, the facility (residence) failed to develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures which included all required elements, affecting 33 current members (residents).Findings include:The residence' s emergency plan failed to include the following: policies that address a pre-determined means of communicating with residents, families, staff and other providers. The emergency plan also failed to include storage and preservation of medications. Lastly, the plan of protection and transfer of health information as needed to meet the care needs of the residents. The residence' s emergency plan failed to include the .. Based on record review and interview, the facility (residence) failed to have policies and procedures to ensure the continuation of care to all residents for 72 hours following any emergency, affecting 33 current members (residents).Findings include:On 12/16/25 at 8:00 a.m., a 72-hour Continuation of Care policy and procedure was requested; however, the residence did not have one included in their policy. On 12/16/25 at approximately 4:00 p.m., the administrator stated she was not aware that a 72-hour plan was included in the residence' s emergency policies. She acknowledged the need for the plan to be in place. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 10 CCR 2505-10 8.7000.8.7411.AA. Complete the timely reporting, recording, and reviewing of Incidents which shall include, but not be limited to:DeathHospitalizationMedical emergencies above and beyond first aidAllegations of MANEInjury or illnessDamage or theft of personal propertyMed errorsLost or missing personCriminal activityIncidents or reports of unusual actions that require review8.7414.A.1-4Provider Agencies provide sufficient support to Members in..

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call