See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

The Bridge Assisted Living Life Care Center of Greeley

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight warm, welcoming, and home-like environment. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

4750 25th St, Greeley, CO 8063470 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
4.3/5

based on 26 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
The Bridge Assisted Living Life Care Center of Greeley Assisted Living in Greeley, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch The Bridge Assisted Living Life Care Center of Greeley

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

The Bridge is highly regarded for its welcoming culture, cleanliness, and responsive management, making it a strong contender for many families. However, because multiple reviewers have raised concerns about night-shift reliability and call light response times, we strongly recommend asking for a tour during evening hours and specifically inquiring about their night-shift staffing ratios.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

26 reviews on Google
The Bridge Assisted Living in Greeley is widely praised for its warm, home-like atmosphere and attentive staff who are frequently described as compassionate and welcoming. While many families report excellent experiences with staff responsiveness and resident engagement, there are recurring concerns regarding inconsistent night-shift care and occasional delays in responding to call lights.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food9.0Staff8.0Clean9.0Activities8.0Meds7.0MemoryN/AComms9.0Value6.0

Strengths

  • Warm, welcoming, and home-like environment
  • Attentive and compassionate staff
  • Effective and responsive communication with families
  • High-quality dining and food options

Concerns

  • Inconsistent night-shift care and call light response times (mentioned by 3 reviewers)
  • Staffing turnover and management issues (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'15(1)'18(2)'21(3)'24(4)'26(1)

Distribution · 31 analyzed

5
24
4
1
3
1
2
2
1
3

How They Respond to Reviews

65%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1I noticed your team is very active in responding to feedback online; how do you use that family input to improve the day-to-day experience for residents?
  • 2Since you have a smaller community of 70 residents, how do you foster that warm, home-like environment during the evening and overnight hours?
  • 3What is your current process for monitoring call light response times to ensure residents feel supported regardless of the shift?
  • 4With your focus on high-quality dining, could you walk me through how you accommodate individual dietary preferences or special requests for residents?
  • 5How does your leadership team work to maintain consistency and stability for the staff so that residents can build long-term, trusting relationships with their caregivers?
  • 6What specific social or wellness activities are planned for the upcoming month that help residents stay connected with one another?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The Bridge has been incredible! They are so attentive, the food is incredible, the place is so clean, and they know all their residents by name.

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★

I am very impressed with the communication with staff members and the response time. Rather than the 3-4 day response time at the previous place, I get answers and or action towards resolution much quicker and usually in the same day.

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★

A few night staff do not always carry through with this personal need even when they are reminded and say they will. The Bridge is home for those who can afford to live there.

Long-term resident's family · 2018★★★☆☆
Source: 26 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
9deficiencies
Aug 6, 2025Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 8/6/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 2/13/25. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Feb 12, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 1160, 1412 and 3 more

A relicensure survey with complaint #CO38526 was completed on 2/13/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to be responsible for the coordination of resident care services with known external service providers (ESPs), affecting two of two sample residents who required testing for a urinary tract infection (#2, #4). (Cross-reference S2230)Findings Include:Resident #4 was admitted to the residence on 6/23/2023 with a diagnosis of urine retention.A progress note, dated 1/4/24, read: "Resident says she has a burning sensation when urinating and thinks she has a (urinary tract infection) UTI." A practitioner' s visit note, dated 1/8/25, contained no information about the residence reporting that the resident had a burning sensation when urinating or t.. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure resident records contained progress notes, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary event or issue that affects a resident' s physical, behavioral, cognitive and/or functional condition, along with the action taken by staff to address that resident' s changing needs, affecting three of six sample residents (#2, #4, #6). (Cross-reference S1412)Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the residence on 7/21/21.A progress note, dated 1/11/25 read in part the resident was discovered on the floor near his recliner. Due to the fall the resident care director (RCD) requested that the resident' s family member request uri.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration affecting two out of five sample residents (#3, #5).Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 11/12/24 with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment.A practitioner' s order read that clopidogrel bisulfate oral tablet was to be administered once daily in the evenings.A medication administration record (MAR) for Resident #5 dated January of 2025 recorded clopidogrel bisulfate was not administered on 1/13 to 1/21/25, due to the medication being unavailable, for a total of 13 missed doses.Resident #5 also went without the following .. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for the identification, reporting, and investigation of injuries of unknown origin, affecting 60 current residents.Findings include:The residence Incident Report policy, dated 8/24/22, was provided by the residence when the Injury of Unknown Origin policy was requested. However, the policy failed to contain all of the required elements such as identifying, documenting, reporting and investigating injuries of unknown origin.Resident #2 was admitted to the residence on 7/21/21 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer ' s Disease with late onset, dementia and senile degeneration of t.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.14.33 The assisted living residence shall ensure that the resident ' s authorized practitioner and resident ' s legal representative are promptly notified of:(A) A decline from a resident ' s baseline status;(B) A resident ' s pattern of refusal;(C) A resident ' s repetitive request for and use of PRN medication;(D) Any observed or reported unfavorable reactions to medications;(E) The administration of medications used to emergently treat angin..

Nov 14, 2024Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 11/14/24 for all previous deficiencies cited on 7/30/24. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Jul 30, 2024Complaint
N/A0000, 1528, 1540 and 3 more

A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO36919 and #CO36960, was completed on 7/30/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the residence failed to prohibit a qualified medication administration person (QMAP) from pre-pouring medication, affecting one current resident (#4).Findings include:1. Residence Policy The residence' s Medication Management policy, dated 8/22/22, read in part: "Medications are stored in the original dispensing containers/packaging. State laws require labels to be intact and legible. (QMAPs) cannot write on labels."2. ObservationOn 7/30/24 at 7:47 a.m., a shelf within the medication cart contained one clear cup, not labeled, that held five small clear packages, each labeled with military time, medication name, and Reside.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to properly identify the right medication with the right resident, affecting one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference S1612)1. Residence PolicyThe residence' s Medication Management policy, dated 8/22/22, read in part: "The resident care director is responsible for ensuring oversight and supervision for following physician orders."2. Record Review Former Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 10/5/24 with diagnoses including polymyalgia rheumatica.A nursing visit note from an external service provider (ESP), dated 7/20/24 at 6:25 a.m., read in part that the residence requested assistance with a large laceration on Former R.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to be responsible for complying with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration, except for those medications which a resident self-administers, affecting two of four sample residents (#2, #3). (Cross-reference S1612)Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence' s Medication Management policy, dated 8/22/22, read in part: "The resident care director is responsible for ensuring oversight and supervision for following physician orders."2. Record ReviewResident #3 was admitted to the residence on 5/30/24 with diagnoses including disorder of the kidney and ureter, hypertensive heart.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to ensure that the resident' s legal representative was promptly notified of a medication error that affected the resident, affecting one former resident (#4). (Cross-reference S1568)Findings include:1. Record Review Former Resident #5 was admitted to the residence on 10/5/23 with diagnoses including polymyalgia rheumatica. An incident report, dated 7/20/24, read in part that Staff #4 administered Resident #3' s medication to Former Resident #5.A nursing visit note from an external service provider (ESP), dated 7/20/24 at 6:25 a.m., read in part: "Notified patient' s daughter of a wound and new orders for pain man.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 2 and at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.2.3.6. Applicants must show compliance with the Colorado Adult Protective Services Data System (CAPS Check) requirements as set forth in section 26-3.1-111, C.R.S. 7.1 In order to ensure that staff members and volunteers are of good, moral, and responsible character, the assisted living residence shall request, prior to staff hire or volunteer on-boarding, a name-based criminal history rec..

Aug 30, 2023Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 8/30/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 3/14/23. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Aug 30, 2023Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Aug 30, 2023Complaint
N/A0000 & 9999

A revisit survey was completed on 8/30/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 3/14/23. The facility is in compliance with all deficiencies that were cited. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally

Mar 14, 2023Follow-up
N/A0000 & 1468

A licensure revisit was completed on 3/14/23 for all previous deficiencies cited on 10/7/22. A deficiency was cited. Based on observation, interview and record review, the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner orders associated with medication administration, affecting six of six sample residents (#25, #27-29, and #31-#32). This deficiency was cited previously during a state licensure survey 10/7/22. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. Residence PolicyThe residence' s Medication Management policy, revised 8/22/22, read in part: the residence was responsible for ensuring oversight and supervision for following physician orders.2. Resident #25 was admitted to the residence on 6/27/22 with diagnoses including chronic myeloid leukemia, long-term use of anticoagulants, hypothyroidism, hypertension, restless legs and hyperlipidemia.a. GleevecA written practitioner' s order, dated 10/25/22, directed the residence to administer two 100 milligram (mg) tablets of Gleevec once daily. However, the January and March 2023 medication administration record (MAR) revealed the medication was not administered on 1/1/23, 1/14-1/15/23, 1/17-1/19/23, 1/21-1/22/23, and 1/25-1/29/23, 1/31/23, and 3/1-3/2/23 for a total of 15 missed doses due to the medication being unavailable. On 3/14/23 at 3:28 p.m., the administrator stated that the pharmacy did not keep Gleevec in stock, so it was not administered until the residence was able to obtain the medication from an outside pharmacy.b. Nitrofurantoin Monohyd MacroA written practitioner' s order for Nitrofurantoin Monohyd Macro 100 mg every 12 hours, dated 3/8/23, was discontinued on 3/8/23. However, the March 2023 MAR revealed administer Nitrofurantoin Monohyd Macro on 3/9/23 in the evening, 3/10/23 in the morning, 3/11/23 both doses, 3/12/23 in the evening, 3/13/23 both doses, and 3/14/23 in the morning, for a total of 8 doses.On 3/14/23 at 3:30 p.m., the administrator stated Nitrofurantoin Monohyd Macro was prescribed for a suspected urinary tract infec..

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call