See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Altavita Memory Care Centre LLC

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight engaging and robust activity schedule. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

800 S Fordham St, Longmont, CO 8050356 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
4.2/5

based on 32 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Altavita Memory Care Centre LLC Assisted Living in Longmont, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Altavita Memory Care Centre LLC

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

AltaVita is highly regarded for its activity programming and leadership engagement, making it a strong contender for families prioritizing social interaction. However, given past reports of neglect and hygiene concerns, we strongly recommend conducting an unannounced visit during a weekend or evening to verify current staffing levels and cleanliness standards.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

32 reviews on Google
AltaVita Memory Care Centre receives high praise for its compassionate staff, engaging activity programs, and a leadership team that is frequently described as professional and communicative. However, the facility has faced serious allegations in the past regarding neglect, hygiene, and staffing levels, which families should investigate thoroughly during their tour.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food8.0Staff7.0Clean6.0Activities9.0Meds8.0Memory8.0Comms9.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Engaging and robust activity schedule
  • Professional and accessible leadership team
  • Warm, compassionate caregiving staff
  • Well-maintained and bright facility environment

Concerns

  • Reports of neglect and hygiene issues (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Inconsistent staffing levels (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.0'17(2)4.22.6'20(5)5.05.0'23(3)5.05.0'25(3)4.0'26(10)

Distribution · 33 analyzed

5
26
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
6

How They Respond to Reviews

37%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1I noticed your activity schedule is quite robust; could you walk me through a typical day for a resident and how you tailor those activities to different levels of engagement?
  • 2With 56 residents, how do you ensure consistent, personalized attention for each individual throughout the day and night?
  • 3We value a clean and comfortable environment; what are your specific protocols for maintaining hygiene and room cleanliness on a daily basis?
  • 4In the event of a medical emergency or a sudden change in health, what is your process for notifying family members and coordinating with outside medical professionals?
  • 5I see that your leadership team is very active in communicating with families; how do you typically keep us updated on our loved one's progress and daily experiences?
  • 6How do you manage staffing transitions to ensure that the compassionate care we see today remains consistent regardless of the shift or day of the week?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The facility is bright, they have amazing activities, the rooms are studio-sized but private, and the staff is wonderful.

Memory care family member · 2024★★★★★

During the ten months he was there, we were consistently impressed with the meals, the building, care-givers who truly cared about Dad and the other residents.

Memory care family member · 2024★★★☆☆

The management and staff took time to get to know him as an individual, and were accommodating to his needs whenever possible.

Long-term resident's family · 2021★★★★★
Source: 32 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

4total
2deficiencies
Nov 5, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

May 29, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Feb 19, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 1528, 2230

A relicensure and complaint revisit was completed on 2/19/25 for the previous deficiencies cited on 12/4/24. Deficiencies were cited.Tag S1528 (14.10) was not cited in the previous event; however, the deficiency was included in the previous event' s informational 999 tag. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure qualified medication administration persons (QMAPs) did not assess residents or make decisions regarding administering medications pro re nata (PRN), affecting one sample resident (#3) residing in the secure environment.Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the residence on 10/20/20 with diagnoses of Alzheimer' s disease, anxiety disorder, and irritable bowel syndrome.A written practitioner order, dated 9/13/24, directed the residence to administer one disintegrating ondansetron 4 mg every six hours as needed for nausea and vomiting. The February 2025 medication administration record (MAR) revealed that the health and wellness assistant #1 (HWA1) administered the medication on 2/5/25.A written practitioner order, dated 9/13/24, directed the residence to administer one loperamide HCl 2 mg as needed for diarrhea: administer two tablets with the first loose stool, then one tablet after each subsequent loose stool. The February 2025 MAR revealed that Staff #5 administered one 2 mg tablet on 2/6/25.On 2/19/25 at 10:12 a.m., the health and wellness director (HWD) stated that Resident #3 was unable to request PRN medications by name. She added that she was a nurse and that the regulation required a nurse to make decisions regarding PRN medications. The HWD stated that these decisi.. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure resident records contained progress notes, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary event or issue that affects a resident' s physical, behavioral, cognitive and/or functional condition, along with the action taken by staff to address that resident' s changing needs, affecting one sample resident (#6) residing in the secure environment.This deficiency was cited previously during a relicensure survey and complaint investigation on 12/4/24. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:Resident #6 was admitted to the residence on 12/19/23.Progress notes, dated 2/2/25 and 2/3/25, read in part that Resident #6 had pain; however, the note contained no documented action taken by the residence to meet the resident' s needs.On 2/19/25 at 12:38 p.m., the administrator stated that the residence failed to document the staff actions in progress notes.On 2/19/25 at 12:44 p.m., the health and wellness director stated that on 2/3/25 she completed a full assessment on Resident #6; he was able to move comfortably, and she contacted the resident' s power of attorney and practitioner. However, she stated she did not document her actions in the progress notes.

Dec 3, 2024Complaint
N/A0000, 1324, 2230 and 1 more

A relicensure survey with complaints #CO38180 and #CO38342 was completed on 12/4/24. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure a resident had the right to be free from neglect, affecting one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference S2230)Specifically, the residence failed to provide, in a timely manner, medical care for Resident #5. Resident #5, in a period of eight days, reported pain frequently and was administered medication which was recorded as ineffective. Furthermore, Resident #5 had hallucinations and the residence failed to follow up with the practitioner or transport the resident to the emergency department. Additionally, the residence failed to provide details of the pain to the practitioner and, in turn, Resident #5 went without treatment for the pain for more than 24 hours and without treatment for a urinary tract infection (UTI) for approximately eight days. Findings include:1. Reference Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, part 2.12, defines "Caretaker neglect" as neglect that occurs when adequate food, clothing, shelter, psychological ca.. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the residence failed to ensure that staff documented, before the end of their shift, any out-of-the-ordinary event or issue regarding a resident that they observed or was reported to them, along with the action taken by staff to address that resident' s needs, affecting three of four sample residents (#1, #3, #4) and one former resident (#5). (Cross-reference S1324)Findings include:Resident #3 was admitted to the residence on 10/20/20 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer' s disease.On 12/3/24 at 11:15 a.m., a soiled incontinence product was in the garbage can in the resident' s room. An odor of urine was detectable from the hallway while the resident' s door was closed.An external service provider (ESP) note, dated 10/22/24, read in part that the resident had a history of urinary tract infection (UTI) and that staff should monitor the resident' s behavior, encourage fluids, and check urine as needed. An electronic message, dated 12/1/24 from a family member of the resident to the administrator, read i.. THIS PORTION OF THE REPORT IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.No response is necessary.The residence was advised it must review and maintain the following processes in accordance with existing program regulations found at 6 CCR 1011-1, Chapter 7.12.18 The assisted living residence' s policy shall also require documentation of the action taken by staff and ongoing efforts to prevent a reoccurrence of the situation in the future. 14.10 Unless otherwise allowed by statute, the assisted living residence shall not permit a qualified medication administration person to perform any of the following tasks:(F) Decision making regarding PRN or "as needed" medication administration.14.31 The administrator and the QMAP supervisor shall, on a quarterly basis, audit the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records, controlled substance list, medication error reports, and medication disposal records. Any irregularities shall be investigated and resolved. The results of the audits shall be documented and routi..

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call