Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm and professional staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 27 Google reviews

Email Alma Via of San Francisco to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Alma Via of San Francisco highly. Reviewers highlight: warm and professional staff, clean and well-maintained facilities. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Prospective families will find a highly positive consensus regarding the facility's cleanliness, the warmth of the staff, and the quality of the dining services. Reviewers frequently note that residents appear happy, engaged, and well-cared for during tours. While the vast majority of recent feedback is glowing, one older review noted a poor initial interaction with front-desk staff.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 30 analyzed
The owner provides highly personalized responses to 5-star reviews, frequently using the reviewer's name and referencing specific details like food, cleanliness, or staff friendliness. For lower-rated reviews, the responses shift to a more formal, templated, or defensive tone.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The building maintains solid staffing ratios, and it shows. Residents receive attentive, compassionate care, and the team always takes the time to greet you with warmth and professionalism.”
“The facility was spotlessly clean but one thing that stood out, and is most important to me, was that the staff clearly knew the residents well, which added to the sense of a tight-knit community.”
“Upon signing in was greeted with a glare 'can I help you' in the most unpleasant tone. It was like I committed a crime walking in.”
Source: CA Community Care Licensing Division
The facility underwent an unannounced annual inspection on October 7, 2025. The inspection covered various areas, including kitchen, medication storage, and resident rooms. The report explicitly states that no citations were issued during this visit.
The unannounced case management visit identified a significant deficiency regarding the use of physical restraints. Specifically, staff were found to have restrained a resident using a gait belt, which violated regulations prohibiting the limitation of a resident's hands or feet. The facility acknowledged the incident and has taken corrective actions, including staff termination and retraining.
The report documents a Case Management visit conducted on May 29, 2025, to deliver an amended report related to a previous finding. The visit involved a review of the amended report with the Administrator and an exit interview. No specific deficiencies were cited in the provided text.
This report details the findings of a complaint investigation regarding alleged improper rate increases for a resident. The allegation was found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Two specific deficiencies were cited concerning the failure to provide proper and detailed written notice of rate increases for dates in 2020 and 2021.
The facility was visited for a Case Management review on 04/11/2025. The Licensing Program Analyst noted that no deficiencies were cited during this visit. The report is an amendment to a previous report dated 04/14/2025, confirming no citations were issued.
This report details a complaint investigation conducted on 04/02/2025 regarding alleged failures in providing resident appraisals and records. All allegations cited in the report were found to be unsubstantiated due to inconsistent information and lack of corroborating evidence. Consequently, no deficiencies were cited.
This report details a complaint investigation conducted on 04/02/2025 regarding alleged failures in providing resident appraisals and records. All allegations cited in the report were found to be unsubstantiated due to inconsistent information and lack of corroborating evidence. Consequently, no deficiencies were cited.
The complaint investigation substantiated the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in a resident eloping from the facility. Two deficiencies were cited, both related to insufficient personnel and supervision, which were deemed immediate health and safety risks. The facility was required to implement corrective actions, including staff termination and retraining, to address these critical findings.
Elder Care Alliance of Sf, Elder Care Alliance
CLEITUS JONES
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
27 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit transformingage.org
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Merced Two Residential Care Facility
< 1 miAssisted Living · San Francisco, CA
Merced Residential Care Facility
< 1 miAssisted Living · San Francisco, CA
San Francisco Post Acute
1.2 miNursing Home · San Francisco, CA
Fook Hong Sf Care Home, INC.
1.3 miAssisted Living · San Francisco, CA
A & J Assisted Living Facility
1.4 miAssisted Living · Daly City, CA
Janet's Residential Facility for the Elderly
1.5 miAssisted Living · San Francisco, CA