Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and attentive care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 23 Google reviews

Email Aegis of Queen Anne at Rodgers Park to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Aegis of Queen Anne at Rodgers Park highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and attentive care staff, engaging social activities and community events. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Aegis of Queen Anne at Rodgers Park is consistently praised by families for its compassionate, attentive staff and vibrant social atmosphere that helps residents thrive. Reviewers frequently highlight the high quality of care, engaging activities, and the facility's ability to create a welcoming community for those with dementia. While the vast majority of feedback is highly positive, one recent review raised a serious concern regarding unprofessional and discriminatory behavior by a staff member.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 25 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“I can't say enough good things about this place. We moved my elderly friend here from a nearby assisted living place where she was being completely neglected. Moving her to Aegis was like night and day in the quality of her care and she has thrived.”
“Since his arrival he has had nothing but fantastic care staff, exacting attention to his care and medication regimen, and great opportunities to make friends and live his life to the fullest.”
“We enjoy our wonderful apartment and are delighted with the consistent competent and Compassionate Care we receive here. We value the many friends we I've met here and love the rich programs we have here with music and fun.”
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
The inspection on 10/09/2025 resulted in a 'Disapproved' status. A subsequent inspection on 03/19/2026 resulted in an 'Approved' status, confirming all previously noted violations were corrected.
Facility failed to provide 5 year FDC hydro static inspection report and quarterly fire sprinkler inspection reports; existing reports identified deficiencies
Electrical cover missing in telco room on second floor across from room 234
Facility failed to provide annual generator inspection report
Sprinkler riser room lacks required signage
Fire extinguishers were inaccessible (locked) during inspection
Holes found in fire rated construction in lobby level director office and loading dock area laundry room
Facility failed to provide semi annual hood system inspection report
Facility failed to provide signage for kitchen cooking appliances
Facility failed to provide fire drill report for the 4th quarter night shift
Inspection on 09/16/2024 was Disapproved; follow-up inspection on 12/16/2024 confirmed all violations noted during previous inspection have been corrected.
3rd floor double doors by 350, 1st floor double doors by room 130, and P1 sprinkler room door will not close/latch.
3rd floor Electrical room penetration across The Belfry; Telco room across room 334 has penetration.
K fire extinguisher damaged/leaking; fire extinguisher in lobby blocked for second year.
Fuel test and Load test documentation not provided.
Missing annual forward flow test documentation; broken dry pipe on patio (yellow tag).
Blocked electrical panel found in kitchen.
Dryer vents need to be cleaned.
Loose tank found in room 350 and Activities office back room.
P1 Activity closet has combustible material inside the 18 inch sprinkler clearance.
Door wedge found holding door in soiled linen room.
Documentation not provided; last tested 3/21/2019.
This is a recurring deficiency previously cited on February 27, 2024, January 27, 2023, and November 1, 2022. A civil fine of $700.00 was imposed.
The licensee failed to monitor and evaluate one resident’s pain issue, placing the resident at risk for diminished quality of life.
The investigation also included a separate complaint summary (Intake ID 145151) noting a resident's pressure wound progressed from Stage 2 to Stage 3 due to non-licensed staff applying prescribed ointments.; Report details significant medication errors for Resident 5 (incorrect dosages and missed doses of Jantoven/Warfarin), incorrect administration of iron supplements, and failure to perform professional wound care for Resident 1.; Report includes multiple instances of recurring deficiencies and failure to follow food safety and medication management protocols.
Staff failed to wash hands during food preparation and before serving meals, placing 12 residents at risk of foodborne illness.
Negotiated Service Agreements (NSA) for Residents 5 and 10 were incomplete. Resident 5's NSA lacked information on private caregiver roles and shower assistance. Resident 10 lacked a required behavior intervention plan.
Facility failed to implement systems to support safe medication services for Residents 1 and 5, resulting in residents not receiving medications as prescribed.
Facility failed to monitor and evaluate a resident's pain issue, placing the resident at risk of diminished quality of life.
Facility failed to update assessment for Resident 5 to include safety considerations and proper usage for installed mobility devices (transfer poles).
Facility failed to implement skin management policies for Resident 1 (resulting in a pressure sore) and failed to monitor/document food temperatures for 12 residents in the Memory Care Unit.
Facility failed to notify physician or evaluate negative outcomes when 3 of 3 sampled residents (5, 8, and 10) refused medication.
Facility failed to follow criteria for nurse delegation for Resident 1, allowing non-licensed staff to administer medications without proper delegation.
Facility failed to secure toxic chemicals in an area accessible to residents, placing 34 residents at risk of ingestion.
Facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were available for 3 of 10 sampled residents, placing them at risk of medical complications.
Facility failed to secure toxic chemicals in an area accessible to residents, placing 34 of 34 residents at risk.
Investigation involved a complaint (ID 140421) regarding missed medications for a specific resident and a Covid-19 outbreak in the memory care unit. Infection control systems were found to be in compliance.
The facility failed to document repeated attempts to refill medications in the resident's record when medication ran out, leaving them unable to provide proof of ensuring necessary refills.
The facility investigated a complaint regarding a caregiver delaying assistance for a resident's toileting needs. The facility terminated the staff member and provided all staff training.
The facility failed to ensure a staff caregiver completed the required 70 hours of DSHS approved basic training within 120 days of hire, allowing them to provide care while untrained.
Total civil fines imposed amount to $3,000.00.
Failed to implement policies regarding skin management and reporting changes of condition, contributing to a resident developing a large, infected unstageable wound without necessary care.
Failed to identify, monitor, evaluate and take action in response to changes in skin condition, resulting in a resident developing a large, infected unstageable wound.
Failed to report the recurrence of a pressure ulcer to the Primary Care Physician and Resident Representative, resulting in a resident developing a large, infected unstageable wound without medical intervention.
Includes follow-up documentation noting deficiencies were corrected by 05/08/2024.
The facility failed to implement their policies regarding skin management and reporting changes of condition for a resident, resulting in a lack of necessary care.
The facility failed to report the recurrence and worsening of a resident's pressure ulcer to the primary care physician and resident representative.
The facility failed to identify, monitor, evaluate, and take action regarding a resident's worsening skin condition, leading to an infected, unstageable pressure wound.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
23 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit aegisliving.com
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Queen Anne Healthcare
< 1 miNursing Home · Seattle, WA
Vineyard Park at Queen Anne Manor
< 1 miAssisted Living · Seattle, WA
Keystone
< 1 miAssisted Living · Seattle, WA
Aegis of Queen Anne on Galer
< 1 miAssisted Living · Seattle, WA
Columbia Lutheran Home
1.2 miNursing Home · Seattle, WA
University House at Wallingford
1.3 miAssisted Living · Seattle, WA