Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention warm, compassionate, and attentive staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 26 Google reviews

Email Vineyard Park of Mercer Island to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Vineyard Park of Mercer Island highly. Reviewers highlight: warm, compassionate, and attentive staff, intimate, home-like community atmosphere. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Vineyard Park of Mercer Island (formerly Sunrise) is generally praised for its warm, compassionate staff and intimate community feel, with many families noting that their loved ones settled in well. However, there are significant reports of inconsistent care, particularly regarding medication management and assistance with daily living, which have led to some families moving their residents out.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 31 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff at the Vineyard Park treated her wonderfully. They showed patience, compassion and a loving attitude toward her. The meals were nutrtitionally prepared and adapted to her eating style.”
“My wife's mental and medical issues, including incontinence, are challenging but Sanchal's excellent management of caregivers and nursing staff has insured that the highest standards of cleanliness and care are maintained.”
“In less than a few days we noticed a huge lack of assistance for mom and started communicating her needs to the nurse and the caregivers assuming that they would understand. These issues included not showering her”
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
There is a follow-up letter dated 04/27/2026 stating that all deficiencies listed in the cover letter (which included the ones detailed here and others) were corrected.; Pages 10-19 included. Multiple WAC violations regarding background checks, TB testing, nursing delegation, resident storage rights, and service planning.; Inspection report includes references to residents 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.; The document consists of a cover letter from DSHS, a Statement of Deficiencies (Page 30), and a provider-submitted Plan of Correction dated March 10, 2026.
Facility failed to perform annual dementia assessments for 4 of 7 sampled residents and failed to perform safety assessments for the use of medical devices (bed canes/transfer devices) for 4 of 4 residents.
The facility failed to maintain chemical sanitation solutions at the correct concentration in two kitchens, placing 40 residents at risk for food borne illness.
Facility failed to complete a one-step TB test for Staff J upon hire.
Facility failed to maintain examination records for one pet and failed to ensure two pets were certified by a veterinarian to be free of diseases transmittable to humans.
The facility failed to maintain a Medical Test Site Waiver (MTSW) license for performing blood glucose tests and failed to publicly post the most recent full inspection report.
The facility failed to complete a written family medication assistance plan for Resident 3 and failed to keep additional significant medications on-site as required.
Facility failed to document medication management/backup interventions for Resident 1 and epilepsy monitoring/care instructions for Resident 12.
Multiple maintenance failures: non-functioning ventilation in laundry and bathroom, broken cupboards, corroded food waste disposal unit leaking fluid, and damaged exterior dumpster area.
Facility failed to ensure safe wound management for Resident 6; wound care was performed by unlicensed staff without nurse delegation.
The facility failed to notify the Department in writing of a change in the assisted living facility administrator within 10 days, placing 40 residents at risk.
Facility failed to complete dementia screening/assessment for Resident 6; facility lacked records for multiple residents. Staff were unfamiliar with requirements.
Facility failed to provide a lockable storage area for 5 of 9 sampled residents.
Facility failed to properly store wiping cloths in a chemical sanitizer solution at the correct concentration in two kitchens.
Memory Care Medication Cart 2 was found unlocked and unattended in the dining room while residents were present.
Facility allowed Staff J to have unsupervised access to residents for 297 days without completing a national fingerprint background check.
The facility failed to provide signage or instructions at memory care unit exits (elevator and stairwells) for visitors, staff, and providers on how to exit without sounding the alarm.
The facility failed to submit a background check for Staff J to the Background Check Central Unit (BCCU) within one business day of hire, allowing them unsupervised access to residents for 293 days.
All violations noted during previous related inspection(s) have been corrected.
Follow-up inspection conducted on 12/09/2024 found no deficiencies; previous deficiencies from 10/10/2024 have been corrected.; Facility also cited in cover letter for consultation deficiency WAC 388-78A-2305 (Food worker card) and WAC 388-78A-2380 (Freedom of movement/egress signage).
Facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 staff (Staff U) maintained current CPR and first aid training, placing residents at risk of receiving inadequate care.
Facility failed to ensure 24 of 24 residents were provided with a copy of the facility's policy regarding Medicaid as a payment source with a signed acknowledgement. Facility held no Medicaid contract and failed to have a separate policy document for resident acknowledgment.
Commercial dishwasher in memory care unit failed to reach minimum sanitization temperature of 120 degrees F, placing 8 residents at risk for foodborne illness.
Facility failed to update service plans for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 2 and 6) regarding the use of specific medical equipment (alternating pressure mattress, tilt-in-space wheelchair, Roho cushion).
Facility failed to submit Washington state background inquiry (BGI) for 1 of 1 sampled contracted staff (Staff H) within one day of start date.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
26 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit carepartnersliving.com
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Island House
< 1 miAssisted Living · Mercer Island, WA
Aegis of Mercer Island
< 1 miAssisted Living · Mercer Island, WA
Aljoya Mercer Island
< 1 miAssisted Living · Mercer Island, WA
Covenant Living West
1.1 miAssisted Living · Mercer Island, WA
Covenant Shores Health Center
1.1 miNursing Home · Mercer Island, WA
Aegis of Bellevue
2.5 miAssisted Living · Bellevue, WA