Strong Medicare quality ratings; public reviewers often praise warm, attentive nursing and care center staff. Still worth an in-person visit.
based on 122 Google reviews

Email VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community has a strong overall Medicare rating. RN hours meet the EveryPlace reference benchmark, which is one useful staffing signal to discuss during a visit. Public reviewers frequently mention: warm, attentive nursing and care center staff and professional and supportive sales/move-in team. Review the component ratings and current source records before deciding.
Vi at Grayhawk is a highly regarded CCRC that receives consistent praise for its attentive nursing staff, professional management, and welcoming community atmosphere. While most residents and families describe an exceptional experience, a minority of reviewers have raised concerns regarding construction noise, recent changes in dining quality, and perceived administrative responsiveness.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 107 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff, including nurses, CNAS, OT, PT and housekeeping are angels in human form. They have been life changing for me.”
“This place is transparent, clean, and so supportive of their patients as well as keeping family informed. This is a place that truly works together as a team and unity for the patient.”
“When Mom died, Vi assisted, sensitively, in every aspect of closing out her account and provided a prompt refund of the 'return of capital' even sooner than they were required to.”
This facility meets both EveryPlace staffing reference benchmarks. Higher staffing is generally associated with stronger day-to-day care.
Reference benchmarks (0.75 RN and 4.1 total nursing hours per resident/day) are comparison targets, not current federal minimum requirements.
Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures
11
measures
2
measures
4
measures
Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication
Residents whose walking got worse
Residents with depression symptoms
Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.
Residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse
Residents needing more daily help over time
Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu
Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics
US average from Medicare published data
Detailed Medicare record · up to 3-year lookback
Vi at Grayhawk has a relatively clean inspection record with only 4 deficiencies across 3 surveys, all corrected by the facility. The main recurring issue involves providing appropriate treatment and care according to residents' preferences, appearing twice including once after a family complaint in 2024. Additional single deficiencies involved accident prevention and infection control, both from 2021 and since corrected.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints 00155285, 00138227, 00130423 and 00156010 conducted on January 13 - 14, 2026:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated and signed on October 18, 2025 that stated R1 received personal care services. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation that stated whether R1 required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints; and was dated and signed by a Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician assistant. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that includes the information prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9 for three out of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy; and A list of any known allergies to any medications, additives, preservatives or materials like latex or adhesive. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy. 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza and pneumonia for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d) states "The department shall: Require as a condition of licensure that nursing care institutions and assisted living facilities make vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia available to residents on site on a yearly basis. The department shall prescribe the manner by which the institutions and facilities shall document compliance with this subdivision, including documenting residents who refuse to be immunized. The department shall not impose a violation on a licensee for not making a vaccination available if there is a shortage of that vaccination in this state as determined by the director." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation of notification of the availability of a vaccination for influenza and pneumonia. Based on R1's date of residency, this document was required. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employee was a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-411 states, "...C. Owners shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 1. Contact previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to a person's fitness to work in a residential care institution...3. Each residential care institution, nursing care institution and home health agency shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 3. Beginning January 1, 2025, verify that a potential employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459. If a potential employee is found to be on the adult protective services registry, the residential care institution, nursing care institution or home health agency may not hire the potential employee. 4. On or before March 31, 2025, verify that each employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459. If an employee is found to be on the adult protective services registry, the residential care institution, nursing care institution or home health agency shall take action to terminate the employment of that employee. 5. Beginning March 31, 2025, annually reverify that each employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459." 2. A review of E1's personnel record revealed no documentation of contacting E1's previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to E1's fitness to work in a residential care institution. Based on E1's hire date, this information was required. 3. A review of E4's personnel record revealed documentation of an adult protective services registry check conducted by the facility on December 31, 2024. However, annual documentation was not available. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a personnel record for each employee included initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to physical health services provided to residents. Findings Include: 1. A review of E5’s personnel record revealed a hire date of November 12, 2025. E5's personnel record did not include documentation of fall prevention and recovery training. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, no additional information was provided.
No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification for room occupancy clarification completed on July 17, 2025.
The Risk-Based complaint survey was conducted on May 28, 2025 through May 29, 2025 for investigation of intakes #s: AZ00168403, AZ00179907, AZ00180479, AZ00181502, AZ00183227. There were no deficiencies cited.
No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00123869 conducted on March 27, 2025
An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00196190 was conducted on February 5, 2025, and no deficiencies were cited :
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on January 21, 2025 for the investigation of intake # AZ00222253, AZ00222153. There were no deficiencies cited.
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00222213, AZ00222074, and AZ00217576 conducted on January 17, 2025:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for four of five personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." The web page stated, "If TST (Mantoux Skin Test) is used for baseline testing, two-step testing is recommended for HCWs (Health Care Workers) whose initial TST results are negative. If the first-step TST result is negative, the second-step TST should be administered 1-3 weeks after the first TST result was read." 3. A review of E1's personnel record revealed a hire date of August 2023. E1's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to hire, an assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, and a determination of signs or symptoms of TB. However, no second TST was available for review. 4. A review of E2's personnel record revealed a hire date of January 2024. E2's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to E2's hire date. However, no second TST, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, or determination of signs or symptoms of TB was available for review. 5. A review of E3's personnel record revealed a hire date of May 2022. E3's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to hire, an assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, and a determination of signs or symptoms of TB. However, no second TST was available for review. 6. A review of E4's personnel record revealed a hire date of August 2022. E4's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to E4's hire date. However, no second TST, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, or determination of signs or symptoms of TB
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for four of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's medical record revealed documentation of R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's freedom from infectious tuberculosis. However, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB or determination of signs or symptoms of TB was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 and E6 acknowledged R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's medical record did not contain documentation of the resident's freedom from infectious tuberculosis as specified in R9-10-113.
A complaint survey was conducted on December 31, 2024 for the investigation of intakes # AZ00207507, AZ00212590, and AZ00216377. There were no deficiencies cited.
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community
for profit
VI Living
10 facilities nationwide
Chain avg rating: 4.8/5 · Rank 1 of 10 (Highest rating)
Owners
Cc Scottsdale INC
Owner · Organization
Plaza Companies LLC
Owner · Organization
Gries Legacy, LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harold E Gries 2007 Irrv Tr
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harper 2010 Irrv Tr
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harper Family Revocable Trust
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harper Legacy, LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Cc-Development Group, INC.
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Key personnel
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Medicare Care Compare
Official Medicare quality ratings, inspections & staffing data
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
122 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit viliving.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Las Fuentes Assisted Living IV
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Clearwater Mayo Blvd
1.3 miAssisted Living · Phoenix, AZ
Maravilla Scottsdale
1.5 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
VI at Silverstone
1.6 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Community
1.6 miNursing Home · Scottsdale, AZ
VI at Silverstone, a VI and Plaza Companies Commun
1.8 miNursing Home · Scottsdale, AZ