VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community
Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise warm, attentive nursing and care center staff. Still worth an in-person visit.
based on 61 Google reviews

Watch VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
Vi at Grayhawk is highly recommended for its exceptional nursing care and supportive environment, making it a top-tier choice for rehabilitation and long-term residency. However, families should inquire about current dining policies and construction schedules, as recent feedback suggests these areas have become points of frustration for some residents.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
61 reviews analyzed“Vi at Grayhawk is a highly regarded CCRC that receives consistent praise for its attentive nursing staff, professional management, and welcoming community atmosphere. While most residents and families describe an exceptional experience, a minority of reviewers have raised concerns regarding construction noise, recent changes in dining quality, and perceived administrative responsiveness.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Warm, attentive nursing and care center staff
- Professional and supportive sales/move-in team
- Clean and well-maintained facility
- Strong sense of community and social engagement
Concerns
- Dissatisfaction with dining options and limited hours (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Concerns regarding management responsiveness and interaction (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1Given the high CMS staffing rating, how does the nursing team balance personalized attention with the needs of the 36 residents in this intimate setting?
- 2I noticed the facility is very well-maintained; could you walk me through how the team ensures this high standard of cleanliness and comfort for the residents?
- 3We appreciate that you actively engage with feedback online; how do you typically incorporate family input when addressing facility operations or resident concerns?
- 4Could you tell me more about the social calendar and how you foster that sense of community that residents seem to enjoy so much?
- 5We’ve heard some families mention interest in more flexible dining options; are there any upcoming plans to expand the menu or extend the current dining hours?
- 6With your excellent 5-star health inspection record, what protocols are in place to ensure consistent, high-quality medical care during both day and night shifts?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff, including nurses, CNAS, OT, PT and housekeeping are angels in human form. They have been life changing for me.”
“This place is transparent, clean, and so supportive of their patients as well as keeping family informed. This is a place that truly works together as a team and unity for the patient.”
“When Mom died, Vi assisted, sensitively, in every aspect of closing out her account and provided a prompt refund of the 'return of capital' even sooner than they were required to.”
Staffing
Staffing Hours
per resident/day · Medicare 2026This facility meets the national staffing benchmarks. Higher staffing is linked to fewer falls and better day-to-day care.
Quality Measures
Quality Measures
Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures
13
measures
2
measures
2
measures
Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication
Residents with depression symptoms
Residents whose walking got worse
Residents needing more daily help over time
Residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Residents on antipsychotic medication
Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu
Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia
Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics
US average from Medicare published data
Inspection History
Medicare Inspection History
3-year lookback · Medicare 2026
Vi at Grayhawk has a relatively clean inspection record with only 4 deficiencies across 3 surveys, all corrected by the facility. The main recurring issue involves providing appropriate treatment and care according to residents' preferences, appearing twice including once after a family complaint in 2024. Additional single deficiencies involved accident prevention and infection control, both from 2021 and since corrected.
Aug 20, 2024Complaint1
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2024Routine2
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Nov 10, 2021Routine2
Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Infection Control Deficiencies
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Jan 13, 2026Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints 00155285, 00138227, 00130423 and 00156010 conducted on January 13 - 14, 2026:
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a personnel record for each employee included initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to physical health services provided to residents. Findings Include: 1. A review of E5’s personnel record revealed a hire date of November 12, 2025. E5's personnel record did not include documentation of fall prevention and recovery training. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that includes the information prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9 for three out of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy; and A list of any known allergies to any medications, additives, preservatives or materials like latex or adhesive. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy. 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employee was a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-411 states, "...C. Owners shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 1. Contact previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to a person's fitness to work in a residential care institution...3. Each residential care institution, nursing care institution and home health agency shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 3. Beginning January 1, 2025, verify that a potential employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459. If a potential employee is found to be on the adult protective services registry, the residential care institution, nursing care institution or home health agency may not hire the potential employee. 4. On or before March 31, 2025, verify that each employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459. If an employee is found to be on the adult protective services registry, the residential care institution, nursing care institution or home health agency shall take action to terminate the employment of that employee. 5. Beginning March 31, 2025, annually reverify that each employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459." 2. A review of E1's personnel record revealed no documentation of contacting E1's previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to E1's fitness to work in a residential care institution. Based on E1's hire date, this information was required. 3. A review of E4's personnel record revealed documentation of an adult protective services registry check conducted by the facility on December 31, 2024. However, annual documentation was not available. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated and signed on October 18, 2025 that stated R1 received personal care services. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation that stated whether R1 required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints; and was dated and signed by a Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician assistant. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza and pneumonia for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d) states "The department shall: Require as a condition of licensure that nursing care institutions and assisted living facilities make vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia available to residents on site on a yearly basis. The department shall prescribe the manner by which the institutions and facilities shall document compliance with this subdivision, including documenting residents who refuse to be immunized. The department shall not impose a violation on a licensee for not making a vaccination available if there is a shortage of that vaccination in this state as determined by the director." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation of notification of the availability of a vaccination for influenza and pneumonia. Based on R1's date of residency, this document was required. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.
Jul 17, 2025OtherCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification for room occupancy clarification completed on July 17, 2025.
May 28, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
The Risk-Based complaint survey was conducted on May 28, 2025 through May 29, 2025 for investigation of intakes #s: AZ00168403, AZ00179907, AZ00180479, AZ00181502, AZ00183227. There were no deficiencies cited.
Mar 27, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00123869 conducted on March 27, 2025
Feb 5, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00196190 was conducted on February 5, 2025, and no deficiencies were cited :
Jan 21, 2025ComplaintCleanReport
An onsite complaint survey was conducted on January 21, 2025 for the investigation of intake # AZ00222253, AZ00222153. There were no deficiencies cited.
Jan 17, 2025Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00222213, AZ00222074, and AZ00217576 conducted on January 17, 2025:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for four of five personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." The web page stated, "If TST (Mantoux Skin Test) is used for baseline testing, two-step testing is recommended for HCWs (Health Care Workers) whose initial TST results are negative. If the first-step TST result is negative, the second-step TST should be administered 1-3 weeks after the first TST result was read." 3. A review of E1's personnel record revealed a hire date of August 2023. E1's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to hire, an assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, and a determination of signs or symptoms of TB. However, no second TST was available for review. 4. A review of E2's personnel record revealed a hire date of January 2024. E2's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to E2's hire date. However, no second TST, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, or determination of signs or symptoms of TB was available for review. 5. A review of E3's personnel record revealed a hire date of May 2022. E3's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to hire, an assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, and a determination of signs or symptoms of TB. However, no second TST was available for review. 6. A review of E4's personnel record revealed a hire date of August 2022. E4's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to E4's hire date. However, no second TST, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, or determination of signs or symptoms of TB
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for four of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's medical record revealed documentation of R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's freedom from infectious tuberculosis. However, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB or determination of signs or symptoms of TB was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 and E6 acknowledged R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's medical record did not contain documentation of the resident's freedom from infectious tuberculosis as specified in R9-10-113.
Dec 31, 2024ComplaintCleanReport
A complaint survey was conducted on December 31, 2024 for the investigation of intakes # AZ00207507, AZ00212590, and AZ00216377. There were no deficiencies cited.
Ownership & Operations
Who Operates This Facility
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community
for profit
Chain Affiliation
VI Living
10 facilities nationwide
Chain avg rating: 4.8/5 · Rank 2 of 10 (Best)
Ownership & Management
Owners
Cc Scottsdale INC
Owner · Organization
Plaza Companies LLC
Owner · Organization
Gries Legacy, LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harold E Gries 2007 Irrv Tr
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harper 2010 Irrv Tr
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harper Family Revocable Trust
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Harper Legacy, LLC
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Cc-development Group, INC.
Owner (parent company) · Organization
Key personnel
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Medicare Care Compare
Official Medicare quality ratings, inspections & staffing data
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
61 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit viliving.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community
< 1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
The Manor Village at Desert Ridge
2.5 miAssisted Living · Phoenix, AZ
Senior Valley Assisted Living LLC
3.3 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Tulsi Assisted Living, LLC
4.1 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
A Better Choice Assisted Living LLC
4.5 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ
Holistic Home Sweetwater
4.6 miAssisted Living · Scottsdale, AZ