See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing Home Top Rated

VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise warm, attentive nursing and care center staff. Still worth an in-person visit.

7501 East Thompson Peak Parkway, North Scottsdale · Scottsdale, AZ 8525536 bedsLicensed & Active
5/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
4.3/5

based on 61 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community Nursing Home in Scottsdale, AZ — Street View
Street View

Watch VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Vi at Grayhawk is highly recommended for its exceptional nursing care and supportive environment, making it a top-tier choice for rehabilitation and long-term residency. However, families should inquire about current dining policies and construction schedules, as recent feedback suggests these areas have become points of frustration for some residents.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

61 reviews analyzed
Vi at Grayhawk is a highly regarded CCRC that receives consistent praise for its attentive nursing staff, professional management, and welcoming community atmosphere. While most residents and families describe an exceptional experience, a minority of reviewers have raised concerns regarding construction noise, recent changes in dining quality, and perceived administrative responsiveness.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food7.0Staff9.0Clean10.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemoryN/AComms7.0Value6.0

Strengths

  • Warm, attentive nursing and care center staff
  • Professional and supportive sales/move-in team
  • Clean and well-maintained facility
  • Strong sense of community and social engagement

Concerns

  • Dissatisfaction with dining options and limited hours (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Concerns regarding management responsiveness and interaction (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'15(1)'17(3)'20(2)'22(3)'24(8)'26(6)

Distribution

5
43
4
2
3
2
2
1
1
8

How They Respond to Reviews

97%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1Given the high CMS staffing rating, how does the nursing team balance personalized attention with the needs of the 36 residents in this intimate setting?
  • 2I noticed the facility is very well-maintained; could you walk me through how the team ensures this high standard of cleanliness and comfort for the residents?
  • 3We appreciate that you actively engage with feedback online; how do you typically incorporate family input when addressing facility operations or resident concerns?
  • 4Could you tell me more about the social calendar and how you foster that sense of community that residents seem to enjoy so much?
  • 5We’ve heard some families mention interest in more flexible dining options; are there any upcoming plans to expand the menu or extend the current dining hours?
  • 6With your excellent 5-star health inspection record, what protocols are in place to ensure consistent, high-quality medical care during both day and night shifts?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff, including nurses, CNAS, OT, PT and housekeeping are angels in human form. They have been life changing for me.

Rehab patient · 2025★★★★★

This place is transparent, clean, and so supportive of their patients as well as keeping family informed. This is a place that truly works together as a team and unity for the patient.

Memory care family member · 2025★★★★★

When Mom died, Vi assisted, sensitively, in every aspect of closing out her account and provided a prompt refund of the 'return of capital' even sooner than they were required to.

Long-term resident's family · 2025★★★★★
Source: 61 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
1.42hrs
OK
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
5.30hrs
OK
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
31%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
25%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

This facility meets the national staffing benchmarks. Higher staffing is linked to fewer falls and better day-to-day care.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
5/ 5
Better Than Avg

13

measures

Worse Than Avg

2

measures

Mixed Results

2

measures

Long-Stay Residents
💊

Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility3.4%
Better than Avg
Here
3.4%
US
19.5%
AZ
20.6%
Maricopa
24.0%
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility2.7%
Better than Avg
Here
2.7%
US
12.1%
AZ
4.0%
Maricopa
4.0%
🚶

Residents whose walking got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility6.0%
Better than Avg
Here
6.0%
US
15.3%
AZ
13.5%
Maricopa
11.4%
🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility5.3%
Better than Avg
Here
5.3%
US
14.4%
AZ
10.6%
Maricopa
8.5%
💉

Residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
93.4%
AZ
97.0%
Maricopa
97.7%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility10.6%
Better than Avg
Here
10.6%
US
15.4%
AZ
11.2%
Maricopa
10.6%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility99.0%
Better than Avg
Here
99.0%
US
79.7%
AZ
87.3%
Maricopa
89.2%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility99.1%
Better than Avg
Here
99.1%
US
81.8%
AZ
91.3%
Maricopa
93.5%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.4%
Better than Avg
Here
0.4%
US
1.6%
AZ
1.1%
Maricopa
1.2%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

1deficiencies
Well below state avg (7.6)
1 complaint-triggered

Vi at Grayhawk has a relatively clean inspection record with only 4 deficiencies across 3 surveys, all corrected by the facility. The main recurring issue involves providing appropriate treatment and care according to residents' preferences, appearing twice including once after a family complaint in 2024. Additional single deficiencies involved accident prevention and infection control, both from 2021 and since corrected.

Aug 20, 2024Complaint
1
0684MinorCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

Feb 27, 2024Routine
2
0689MinorCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0689MinorCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Nov 10, 2021Routine
2
0684MinorCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

0880MinorCorrected

Infection Control Deficiencies

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

13total
10deficiencies
Jan 13, 2026Complaint

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints 00155285, 00138227, 00130423 and 00156010 conducted on January 13 - 14, 2026:

Health care institutions; fall prevention and fall recovery; training programs; definitionA.R.S. § 36-420.01.ACorrected Feb 2, 2026

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a personnel record for each employee included initial training and continued competency training in fall prevention and fall recovery for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk as the caregiver received no organized instruction or information related to physical health services provided to residents.  Findings Include: 1. A review of E5’s personnel record revealed a hire date of November 12, 2025. E5's personnel record did not include documentation of fall prevention and recovery training. 2. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, no additional information was provided.

Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge documentA.R.S. § 36-420.04.CCorrected Feb 14, 2026

Based on record review and interview, the assisted living center failed to maintain a standardized form for each resident that includes the information prescribed in A.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9 for three out of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was not prepared in case of an emergency. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy; and A list of any known allergies to any medications, additives, preservatives or materials like latex or adhesive. 2. A review of R2's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: The name, address and telephone number of the resident's current pharmacy. 3. A review of R3's medical record revealed a standardized form to be used if an emergency responder was contacted, however, the form was missing the following information: Basic information about the resident's physical and mental conditions and basic medical history. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

AdministrationR9-10-803.A.9Corrected Jan 23, 2026

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure compliance with A.R.S. § 36-411, for one of seven employees sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the employee was a danger to a vulnerable population. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-411 states, "...C. Owners shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 1. Contact previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to a person's fitness to work in a residential care institution...3. Each residential care institution, nursing care institution and home health agency shall make documented, good faith efforts to: 3. Beginning January 1, 2025, verify that a potential employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459. If a potential employee is found to be on the adult protective services registry, the residential care institution, nursing care institution or home health agency may not hire the potential employee. 4. On or before March 31, 2025, verify that each employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459. If an employee is found to be on the adult protective services registry, the residential care institution, nursing care institution or home health agency shall take action to terminate the employment of that employee. 5. Beginning March 31, 2025, annually reverify that each employee is not on the adult protective services registry pursuant to section 46-459." 2. A review of E1's personnel record revealed no documentation of contacting E1's previous employers to obtain information or recommendations that may be relevant to E1's fitness to work in a residential care institution. Based on E1's hire date, this information was required. 3. A review of E4's personnel record revealed documentation of an adult protective services registry check conducted by the facility on December 31, 2024. However, annual documentation was not available. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

a-b. Residency and Residency AgreementsR9-10-807.B.1.a-bCorrected Feb 14, 2026

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse that stated whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical record revealed a service plan dated and signed on October 18, 2025 that stated R1 received personal care services. 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation that stated whether R1 required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints; and was dated and signed by a Physician, Registered nurse practitioner, Registered nurse, or Physician assistant. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

Medical RecordsR9-10-811.C.17Corrected Feb 14, 2026

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident’s medical record contained documentation of notification of the resident of the availability of vaccination for influenza and pneumonia for one of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A.R.S. § 36-406(1)(d) states "The department shall: Require as a condition of licensure that nursing care institutions and assisted living facilities make vaccinations for influenza and pneumonia available to residents on site on a yearly basis. The department shall prescribe the manner by which the institutions and facilities shall document compliance with this subdivision, including documenting residents who refuse to be immunized. The department shall not impose a violation on a licensee for not making a vaccination available if there is a shortage of that vaccination in this state as determined by the director." 2. A review of R1's medical record revealed no documentation of notification of the availability of a vaccination for influenza and pneumonia. Based on R1's date of residency, this document was required. 3. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

Jul 17, 2025Other
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification for room occupancy clarification completed on July 17, 2025.

May 28, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

The Risk-Based complaint survey was conducted on May 28, 2025 through May 29, 2025 for investigation of intakes #s: AZ00168403, AZ00179907, AZ00180479, AZ00181502, AZ00183227. There were no deficiencies cited.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the on-site investigation of complaint 00123869 conducted on March 27, 2025

Feb 5, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

An on-site investigation of complaint AZ00196190 was conducted on February 5, 2025, and no deficiencies were cited :

Jan 21, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

An onsite complaint survey was conducted on January 21, 2025 for the investigation of intake # AZ00222253, AZ00222153. There were no deficiencies cited.

Jan 17, 2025Complaint

The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00222213, AZ00222074, and AZ00217576 conducted on January 17, 2025:

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-806.A.8.a-b

Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a caregiver provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for four of five personnel sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website revealed a web page titled, "Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings, 2005." The web page stated, "If TST (Mantoux Skin Test) is used for baseline testing, two-step testing is recommended for HCWs (Health Care Workers) whose initial TST results are negative. If the first-step TST result is negative, the second-step TST should be administered 1-3 weeks after the first TST result was read." 3. A review of E1's personnel record revealed a hire date of August 2023. E1's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to hire, an assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, and a determination of signs or symptoms of TB. However, no second TST was available for review. 4. A review of E2's personnel record revealed a hire date of January 2024. E2's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to E2's hire date. However, no second TST, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, or determination of signs or symptoms of TB was available for review. 5. A review of E3's personnel record revealed a hire date of May 2022. E3's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to hire, an assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, and a determination of signs or symptoms of TB. However, no second TST was available for review. 6. A review of E4's personnel record revealed a hire date of August 2022. E4's personnel record included a negative TST within 12 months prior to E4's hire date. However, no second TST, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB, or determination of signs or symptoms of TB

Except as provided in R9-10-808(B)(2), a manager shall ensure that a resident provides evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis:R9-10-807.A.1-2

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a resident provided evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB) as specified in R9-10-113 for four of five residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a potential illness risk to residents. Findings include: 1. R9-10-113.A states, "If a health care institution is subject to the requirements of this Section, as specified in an Article in this Chapter, the health care institution's chief administrative officer shall ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that...2. Include: a. For each individual who is employed by the health care institution, provides volunteer services for the health care institution, or is admitted to the health care institution and who is subject to the requirements of this Section, screening, on or before the date specified in the applicable Article of this Chapter, that consists of: i. Assessing risks of prior exposure to infectious tuberculosis, ii. Determining if the individual has signs or symptoms of tuberculosis, and iii. Obtaining documentation of the individual's freedom from infectious tuberculosis according to subsection (B)(1)..." 2. A review of R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's medical record revealed documentation of R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's freedom from infectious tuberculosis. However, assessment of risks of prior exposure to infectious TB or determination of signs or symptoms of TB was not available for review. 3. In an interview, E1 and E6 acknowledged R2's, R3's, R4's, and R5's medical record did not contain documentation of the resident's freedom from infectious tuberculosis as specified in R9-10-113.

Dec 31, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

A complaint survey was conducted on December 31, 2024 for the investigation of intakes # AZ00207507, AZ00212590, and AZ00216377. There were no deficiencies cited.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

VI at Grayhawk, a VI and Plaza Companies Community

Organization Type

for profit

Chain Affiliation

Chain Name

VI Living

Chain Size

10 facilities nationwide

Chain avg rating: 4.8/5 · Rank 2 of 10 (Best)

Ownership & Management

Owners

Cc Scottsdale INC

Owner · Organization

50%

Plaza Companies LLC

Owner · Organization

50%

Gries Legacy, LLC

Owner (parent company) · Organization

25%

Harold E Gries 2007 Irrv Tr

Owner (parent company) · Organization

25%

Harper 2010 Irrv Tr

Owner (parent company) · Organization

12%

Harper Family Revocable Trust

Owner (parent company) · Organization

13%

Harper Legacy, LLC

Owner (parent company) · Organization

25%

Cc-development Group, INC.

Owner (parent company) · Organization

Key personnel

Gries, HaroldManaging Control - Governing BodyHarper, SharonManaging Control - Governing BodyMuszynski, ThomasManaging Control - Governing BodyPoorman, JohnManaging Control - Governing BodySmith, GaryManaging Control - Governing Body
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call