See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid Top Rated

Valley View Villa

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise warm, attentive, and compassionate nursing staff. Still worth an in-person visit.

815 Fremont Ave, Fort Morgan, CO 80701120 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
5/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
4.9/5

based on 184 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Valley View Villa Nursing Home in Fort Morgan, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Valley View Villa

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Valley View Villa is highly regarded for its compassionate care and effective rehabilitation services. While the facility is consistently praised for its cleanliness and friendly staff, families should remain observant during visits and feel empowered to communicate directly with management if they notice any inconsistencies in care or environmental comfort.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

184 reviews on Google
Valley View Villa is widely praised by families for its compassionate staff, clean environment, and effective rehabilitation services. While the vast majority of reviews are highly positive, families should be aware of isolated reports regarding inconsistent nursing communication and occasional environmental comfort issues like room temperature.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food9.0Staff9.0Clean10.0Activities9.0Meds8.0MemoryN/AComms8.0ValueN/A

Strengths

  • Warm, attentive, and compassionate nursing staff
  • Clean and well-maintained facility
  • Effective physical and occupational therapy programs
  • Strong communication with families regarding care plans

Concerns

  • Inconsistent nursing care or unprofessional behavior by specific staff members (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Environmental comfort issues (e.g., stuffy rooms, fire alarms) (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

2345.02022(9)4.82023(22)4.82024(35)4.92025(39)4.92026(24)

Distribution · 129 analyzed

5
115
4
10
3
3
2
1
1
0

How They Respond to Reviews

93%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1It is so wonderful to see how much the management engages with the community through their responses to feedback; how do you typically involve families in the care planning process?
  • 2The nursing staff clearly receives so much praise for being compassionate; how do you ensure that this high level of attentive care remains consistent across all shifts?
  • 3We noticed the facility is exceptionally well-maintained; are there any specific plans for ongoing improvements to the room ventilation or climate control to ensure everyone stays comfortable?
  • 4With such a strong reputation for physical and occupational therapy, how do the therapists work with residents to help them reach their specific mobility goals?
  • 5What does a typical day of social activities and engagement look like for the residents here at Valley View Villa?
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency or a sudden change in health, what is the protocol for notifying the family and coordinating with doctors?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff at Valley View were absolutely amazing. He was so impressed with everyone from the housekeeping staff to the dietary aides that would take his meal orders, to the P/T department

Rehab patient's family · 2022★★★★★

If death can be a good experience, and at 96 it can be, this was a good and peaceful death. Thank you, all.

Long-term resident's friend · 2025★★★★★

The staff from top to bottom is fantastic. Their attitude towards the patients is unmatched and while taking care of my mother during a rehab stint, they became friends and family.

Rehab patient's family · 2024★★★★★
Source: 184 Google reviews

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
5/ 5
Better Than Avg

11

measures

Worse Than Avg

5

measures

Similar to Avg

1

measures

Long-Stay Residents
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility3.5%
Better than Avg
Here
3.5%
US
12.1%
CO
8.5%
Morgan
29.1%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

💊

Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility4.5%
Better than Avg
Here
4.5%
US
19.5%
CO
11.3%
Morgan
23.6%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility3.5%
Better than Avg
Here
3.5%
US
15.5%
CO
20.0%
Morgan
19.8%
🚶

Residents whose walking got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility7.2%
Better than Avg
Here
7.2%
US
15.3%
CO
14.4%
Morgan
14.2%
💉

Residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
95.5%
CO
94.7%
Morgan
92.8%
💉

Residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
93.4%
CO
93.6%
Morgan
97.2%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility100.0%
Better than Avg
Here
100.0%
US
81.8%
CO
76.3%
Morgan
81.9%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility97.4%
Better than Avg
Here
97.4%
US
79.8%
CO
75.6%
Morgan
76.2%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility1.6%
Here
1.6%
US
1.6%
CO
1.5%
Morgan
1.5%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

2deficiencies
1penalties
Well below state avg (8.8)
1 complaint-triggered
$7,443 in fines

Valley View Villa shows recurring issues with fire safety systems and building infrastructure across multiple surveys, with the most recent December 2024 inspection citing fire safety deficiencies that have correction plans in place. A family filed a complaint resulting in a medication error citation, indicating concerns about medication management. While most deficiencies appear to be corrected after identification, the persistent fire safety issues across surveys suggest ongoing infrastructure challenges families should discuss during visits.

Dec 1, 2025Complaint
1
0760Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

Dec 19, 2024Routine
8
0351Potential for harm · Widespread

Smoke Deficiencies

Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.

0353Potential for harm · Widespread

Smoke Deficiencies

Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

0918Potential for harm · Widespread

Gas, Vacuum, and Electrical Systems Deficiencies

Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

0321Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

0345Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

0363Potential for harm · Pattern

Smoke Deficiencies

Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

0880Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Infection Control Deficiencies

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

0324Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

Aug 17, 2023Routine
9
0689Actual harm · IsolatedResolved (past non-compliance)

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0353Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

0363Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

0211Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Egress Deficiencies

Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.

0324Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Provide properly protected cooking facilities.

0372Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

0511Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Services Deficiencies

Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

0521Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Services Deficiencies

Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.

0923Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Gas, Vacuum, and Electrical Systems Deficiencies

Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.

Aug 6, 2019Routine
3
0880Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Infection Control Deficiencies

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

0758Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.

0345Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

Federal Penalties

Fine

Aug 17, 2023

$7,443

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

7total
4deficiencies
Apr 30, 2025Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Jan 14, 2025Routine
N/A0000 & 0324

Based on observation and staff interview during the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the kitchen cooking appliance locations in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 96.1. Missing a Semi-Annual Hood Cleaning Inspection Report 11.2.1* Maintenance of the fire-extinguishing systems and listed exhaust hoods containing a constant or fire-activated water system that is listed to extinguish a fire in the grease removal devices, hood exhaust plenums, and exhaust ducts shall be made by properly trained, qualified, and certified person(s) acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction at least every 6 months.This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Administrator and Maintenance director at the exit conference. INITIAL COMMENTS (ID Prefix Tag #K000) are informational only and represent the facility' s general characteristics.This survey was conducted in accordance with the Federal Register at Section 42 CFR 483.70(a).This survey was conducted on January 14th, 2025 for compliance with the National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA 101) Life Safety Code (2012) Chapter 19 "Existing Health Care Occupancies."This structure is a one (1) story, Type V (000) construction. This structure has a partial basement for support services only and no resident access. The facility is licensed for 120 beds and the census on the date of the survey was 37. The facility was constructed in 1975. The facility is fully protected by a National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 13 automatic wet-pipe and dry fire sprinkler systems. The anti-freeze loop protects the exterior canopy and exterior overhangs. The facility is classified as fully sprinklered.The results of this survey were discussed with the Director of Maintenance and the Facility Administrator during the exit conference conducted on January 14th, 2025.

Dec 31, 2024Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Dec 19, 2024Complaint
N/A0000 & 0880

A recertification survey with complaint #CO37811 was completed on 12/16/24 to 12/19/24. One deficiency was cited. An Emergency Preparedness survey was conducted from 12/16/24 to 12/19/24. No deficiencies were cited. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping staff followed appropriate cleaning practices by treating each side of the room as a separate patient zone, cleaning all high touch surfaces and cleaning items in the rooms from cleanest to dirtiest.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Environment Cleaning Procedures (3/19/24), retrieved on 12/23/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/healthcare-associated-infections/hcp/cleaning-global/procedures.html, "Proceed from cleaner to dirtier areas to avoid spreading dirt and microorganisms. "Change cleaning cloths between each patient zone (use a new cleaning cloth for each patient bed),"High-Touch Surfaces: The identification of high-touch surfaces and items in each patient care area is a necessary prerequisite to the development of cleaning procedures, as these will often differ by room, ward and facility."Common high-touch surfaces include: bedrails; IV (intravenous) poles; sink handles..

Nov 30, 2023Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Sep 13, 2023Routine
N/A0000, 0211, 0324 and 6 more

During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment and operating procedures according to NFPA 101, NFPA 99 (2012) and NFPA 55 (2010). This was evidenced by the following: 1. Full and empty oxygen containers were not separated.2. Oxygen storage room ventilation was poor.3. Out of service electrical components were not removed or covered in oxygen storage room.NFPA 99 11.6.5.1 Storage shall be planned so that .. During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the corridor requirements in accordance with NFPA 101, NFPA 80 (2010) and NFPA 105 (2010). This was evidenced by:1. Missing annual rated door inspection/testing/maintenance report.2. Metal trim (astragal) on the non-rated corridor doors between the dining room and front lobby prevents the doors from easily opening in the direction of egress. NFPA 101 7.2.1.15.2 Fi.. During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the egress requirements in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012). This was evidenced by:1. Sidewalk is uneven from the west door egress path and from the interior courtyard.NFPA 101 7.1.6.2 Changes in Elevation. Abrupt changes in elevation of walking surfaces shall not exceed 1/4 in. (6.3 mm). Changes in elevation exceeding 1/4 in. (6.3 mm), but not exceeding 1/2 in. (13 mm), shall be beveled .. During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the fire and smoke resistive construction requirements in accordance with NFPA 101. This was evidenced by:1. Accounts payable office has damage to the drywall over closet.2. Boiler room has damage to drywall materials in several areas.NFPA 101 19.3.7.3 to comply with section 8.5. Section 8.5.2.2, "Smoke barriers shall be continuous through all concealed spaces, such as those found a.. During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the operational requirements in accordance with NFPA 101, NFPA 54 (2012) and NFPA 96 (2011). This was evidenced by:1. Wheeled, gas fueled kitchen appliance restraint tethers were not attached or installed.NFPA 54 (2012) 9.6.1.1 Commercial Cooking Appliances. Commercial cooking appliances that are moved for cleaning and sanitation purposes shall be connected in accordance with the co.. During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the protection requirements in accordance with NFPA 101 (2012), NFPA 80 (2010) and NFPA 90A (2012). This was evidenced by:1. Missing 4-year fire damper inspection/testing/maintenance report.NFPA 101 Referenced Publications 2.2 NFPA Publications NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, 2010 edition.-NFPA 80 19.4 Periodic Inspection and Testing 19.4.1.1 The t.. During the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the protection requirements in accordance with NFPA 101, NFPA 25 (2011) and NFPA 13 (2010). This was evidenced by:1. Missing spare fire sprinkler inventory list in riser room.2. Multiple fire sprinklers were loaded, painted or corroded throughout the building.3. Freezer was protected with a dry fire sprinkler manufactured in 2009.NFPA 13 6.2.9.7 A list of the sprinklers installed in the prop.. During the survey, it was determined the facility failed to maintain electrical and gas equipment with NFPA 101, NFPA 54 (2012) and NFPA 70 (2011) based on the following:1. Gas dryer orifice size was rated for 0-2,000 feet in elevation. Site elevation is over 4,000 feet.NFPA 54 11.1.2 High Altitude. Gas input ratings of appliances shall be used for elevations up to 2000 ft (600 m). The input ratings of appliances operating at elevations above 2000 ft (600 m) shall .. INITIAL COMENTS (ID Prefix Tag #K000) are informational only and a representation of the facility' s general characteristics.This survey was conducted in accordance with the Federal Register at Section 42 CFR 483.70(a).This survey was conducted on September 13, 2023 for compliance with the National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA 101) Life Safety Code (2012) Chapter 19 "Existing Health Care Occupancies."This structure is a one (1) story, Type V (000) ..

Aug 17, 2023Other
N/A0000 & 0709

A licensure survey was completed on 8/15/23 to 8/17/23. No deficiencies were cited. Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement appropriate nutritional interventions for one (#13) of two residents reviewed for nutrition out of 18 sample residents to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status.Specifically the facility failed to implement appropriate nutrition interventions when the resident sustained a severe, 13% weight loss in three months. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident at Risk (RAR) policy, revised 12/16/21, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/17/23 at approximately 2:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: "The facility conducts a weekly resident at risk meeting to review residents identified with problems or concerns related to their nutritional status or have an identified risk factor that may lead to nutrition and hydration issues. The Review List includes but is not limited to the following. Readmission after a temporary stay at the hospital if there has been a change that affects the resident' s nutritional status for a minimum of one week. Residents with significant weight change: 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days, 10% in 180 days. "Documentation recorded in the medical record may be completed by a designated committee member and may include but is not limited to:-Acknowledgement of any significant change, if applicable-Progression/digression of interventions-Change to interventions-Updating the care plan. Interventions should be specific, individualized and dated.The designee for Food and Nutrition Services may complete the following before the meeting:-Update food preference-Follow up on prior interventions to determine the effectiveness-Discuss resident dining/food concerns with nursing staff-Speak with family members-Review medical information, meal consumptions, nursing notes, labs. The designee for Nursing may complete the following before the meeting:-Review current labs-Review snack/supplement consumption-Ensure the physician, resident and/or responsible party have be..

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Valley View Villa

Organization Type

for profit

Chain Affiliation

Chain Name

Life Care Centers of America

Chain Size

194 facilities nationwide

Chain avg rating: 3.5/5 · Rank 22 of 194 (Best)

Ownership & Management

Owners

Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund I Lp

Owner · Organization

100%

Fund I Investments Limited Partnership

Owner (parent company) · Organization

96%

Key personnel

Fricke, RhondaManaging Control - Governing BodySchmidt, DerekManaging Control - Governing BodyUnderwood, JanaManaging Control - Governing BodyFletcher, ToddOfficer / DirectorLay, LisaOfficer / Director
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call