Limited public data on The Parc at Sharon Amity. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 23 Google reviews
Email The Parc at Sharon Amity to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit The Parc at Sharon Amity in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
Recent reviews from 2025 overwhelmingly praise the facility for its compassionate, attentive staff and high standards of sanitation. However, historical reviews contain serious allegations regarding patient safety, management communication, and potential neglect that families should investigate thoroughly.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 23 analyzed
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff couldn't be more impressive. Everyone is so attentive to all of the needs and concerns of both resident and their family.”
“Wayne and his team immediately embraced him and saw and understood his unique presentation of the disease and the Parc became his home until he passed away in July.”
“I was so apprehensive of placing her in a memory care facility because of the horror stories you can hear about them. I never once had any concerns about my Grandmothers care or any complaints for any of the staff.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure referral and follow-up to meet the acute health care needs for Resident #6, who was refusing meals. There was no documentation that the Primary Care Provider was notified of the meal refusals, which prevented the implementation of necessary nutritional interventions like supplemental shakes.
The facility failed to ensure that each resident was served a minimum of three nutritionally adequate meals at regular times. Specifically, Resident #6 was not provided breakfast or lunch trays in the dining room when refusing to leave her bed, and staff failed to provide alternative meal service to meet nutritional requirements.
The facility failed to ensure proper referral and follow-up to meet the acute health care needs of a resident. Specifically, there was no documentation that the Primary Care Provider was notified that Resident #6 was refusing meals, and there was no evidence of communication between care staff regarding this change in condition.
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was served the correct physician-ordered diet. Specifically, a resident prescribed a mechanical soft diet was observed being served a regular consistency meal consisting of turkey, biscuit, sweet potatoes, and zucchini strips.
The facility failed to ensure that a resident was served the correct physician-ordered diet. A review of records showed a discrepancy between the resident's prescribed mechanical soft diet and the diet orders documented in the kitchen, leading to potential inaccuracies in meal service.
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical and mental abuse following a shower refusal, which resulted in a fractured vertebra and a seventeen-day hospitalization. Specifically, there was no documentation of interventions used to manage the resident's aggressive behavior or the refusal of care.
The facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical and mental abuse during a shower refusal. Two staff members allegedly forcefully threw the resident in the bathtub and into bed, resulting in a lumbar vertebra fracture that required hospitalization and a kyphoplasty procedure.
The facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled for 2 of 6 sampled residents. Specifically, a pharmacy-generated label on a medication pouch for Resident #4 did not reflect a recent physician's order change for insulin dosage, leading to an incorrect administration attempt.
The facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled for 2 of 6 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #4, the pharmacy-provided pouch for Novolog FlexPen contained an outdated dosage instruction (20 units) that did not reflect a recent physician order change to 23 units.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
23 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Brookdale Charlotte East
< 1 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Wilora Lake Healthcare
< 1 miNursing Home · Charlotte, NC
East Towne
< 1 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Accordius Health at Charlotte
1.1 miNursing Home · Charlotte, NC
Parker Terrace
1.4 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Cuthbertson Village at Aldersgate
1.4 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC