See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Sunridge Village

Limited public data on Sunridge Village. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.

839 Landon Drive, Bullhead City, AZ 86429Licensed & Active
Google rating
3.2/5

based on 27 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Watch Sunridge Village

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While certain staff members are noted for their compassion, the facility has significant, recurring issues with cleanliness, hygiene, and resident safety. If you choose this facility, you must prioritize frequent in-person visits to monitor for cleanliness and ensure medication protocols are being strictly followed.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

27 reviews analyzed
Families should approach this facility with significant caution due to recurring reports of poor cleanliness, hygiene issues like bed bugs, and serious concerns regarding resident safety and medication management. While some reviewers praise specific staff members for being caring and helpful, there is a persistent pattern of complaints regarding understaffing and facility maintenance.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food1.0Staff4.0Clean1.0ActivitiesN/AMeds1.0MemoryN/AComms3.0Value2.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate individual caregivers
  • Helpful assistance with benefits navigation
  • Peaceful environment for some residents

Concerns

  • Poor facility cleanliness and hygiene (mentioned by 3 reviewers)
  • Inadequate staffing levels (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Medication management errors (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Resident falls and physical safety (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'15(1)'18(2)'20(6)'23(2)'25(2)'26(1)

Distribution

5
13
4
1
3
2
2
0
1
11

How They Respond to Reviews

11%response rate

This facility rarely responds to reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1I've heard wonderful things about the compassion of your individual caregivers; how do you ensure that this level of personal care remains consistent for every resident?
  • 2Could you walk me through your daily cleaning and housekeeping schedule to ensure the living spaces stay fresh and hygienic?
  • 3What specific protocols do you have in place for medication management to ensure every dose is accurate and timely?
  • 4How does the staff monitor residents during the night to prevent falls and ensure everyone stays safe while sleeping?
  • 5We would love to hear more about the dining experience and what a typical daily menu looks like for the residents.
  • 6In the event of a medical emergency after hours, what is the immediate process for contacting doctors and notifying the family?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff is super friendly, caring and helpful in every way. When I called the staff never hesitated to let me speak with my mom and always answered all my questions.

Family member of a resident · 2020★★★★★

The floor staff however is great to the residents (even when they are over worked and Under appreciated)

Reviewer · 2019★★★★★

Every time I went to see him he had one kind of an abrasion on his elbows or knees or face because he had fallen. Was awakened almost every other day with a call from the facility that he had fallen.

Spouse of a resident · 2022☆☆☆☆
Source: 27 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: AZ State Licensing Agency

7total
10deficiencies
Feb 26, 2026Complaint

An on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints 00108144, 00160035, 00160049, 00121624, and 00127517 was conducted on February 26, 2026, and a review of documentation was completed on March 9, 2026. The following deficiencies were cited:

Emergency responders; patient information; hospitals; discharge planning; patient screenings; discharge documentA.R.S. § 36-420.04.A.1-9Corrected Mar 31, 2026

Based on documentation review and interview, the assisted living center failed to provide a written document which covered A.R.S § 36-420.04.A.1-9, when the assisted living center contacted an emergency responder on behalf of the resident, for one of eight residents sampled. Findings include: 1 . A review of R5's medical record revealed an incident where R5 was sent to the hospital by the facility on February 15, 2026. However, documentation of a written document presented to emergency medical services (EMS) that included all items covered under A.R.S § 36-420.04.A.1-9 at the time of incident was not available for review at the time of inspection. 2 . In an exit interview, the finding was discussed with E1 and no additional information was provided.

b. Service PlansR9-10-808.A.3.bCorrected Apr 1, 2026

Based on documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure residents had a written service plan which accurately included the level of service the resident was expected to receive, for one of eight resident records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as the service plan did not reinforce and clarify the services to be provided to a resident. Findings include: A.R.S. § 36-401.50 "Supervisory care services" means general supervision, including daily awareness of resident functioning and continuing needs, the ability to intervene in a crisis and assistance in self-administering prescribed medications. A.R.S. § 36-401.41 "Personal care services" means assistance with activities of daily living that can be performed by persons without professional skills or professional training and includes the coordination or provision of intermittent nursing services and the administration of medications and treatments by a nurse who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 15 or as otherwise provided by law. A.R.S. § 36-401.16 "Directed care services" means programs and services, including supervisory and personal care services, that are provided to persons who are incapable of recognizing danger, summoning assistance, expressing need or making basic care decisions. 1. In an interview, E1 reported that R2 and R4 were receiving supervisory care services and were living on the assisted living side. 2. Review of R2 and R4's service plans indicated the level of care as supervisory services. However, both residents received medication administration. 3. In an exit interview, the finding was reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

Emergency and Safety StandardsR9-10-819.A.4Corrected Apr 30, 2026

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a disaster drill for employees was conducted on each shift, at least once every three months, and documented. The deficient practice posed a risk if employees were unable to implement a disaster plan. Findings include: 1. A review of facility staffing schedules revealed the facility operated three shifts: days, 6:00 a.m. – 2:30 p.m., evening shift, 2:00 p.m. – 10:30 p.m., and nights, 10:00 p.m. – 6:30 a.m. 2. A review of facility documentation revealed evidence of documentation of disaster drills conducted on the first and second shifts. However, there was no documentation that disaster drills were being conducted on the third shift. Evidence of documentation of any additional disaster drills conducted was unavailable for review. 3. In an interview, E1 agreed that disaster drills were not being conducted on each shift, at least once every three months, and documented. 4. In an exit interview, the findings were reviewed with E1, and no additional information was provided.

Aug 14, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the investigation of complaints AZ00210843, AZ00214248 and AZ00214465 conducted on August 14, 2024.

Jul 19, 2024Complaint

The following deficiency was found during the investigation of complaint AZ00213300 conducted on July 19, 2024.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-819.A.4Corrected Jul 18, 2024

Based on observation and interview the manager failed to ensure that cooling systems maintain the assisted living facility at a temperature between 70\'b0 F and 84\'b0 F at all times. Findings include: 1. During an interview E1 stated, "Our air conditioning for the memory unit common area was broken for about one and a half weeks. The temperature got up to 88 degrees (Fahrenheit) in there. We stopped using the area until it was fixed." 2. At the time of the survey the temperature in the memory unit common area was observed to be 75 degrees Fahrenheit. 3. During an interview E1 acknowledged the cooling systems failed to maintain the assisted living facility at a temperature between 70\'b0 F and 84\'b0 F at all times.

Apr 24, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the investigation of complaint AZ00208823 conducted on April 24, 2024.

Mar 8, 2024Complaint

The following deficiency was found during the investigation of complaints AZ00207102 and AZ00207332 conducted on March 8, 2024.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-819.A.1.aCorrected Mar 8, 2024

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that the premises and equipment were cleaned and, if applicable, disinfected according to policies and procedures designed to prevent, minimize, and control illness or infection. Findings include: 1. Observation of R2's room revealed the carpet to be heavily stained and discolored in the heavy traffic areas of the room and hallways. A 15" x 6" (approximate) section of carpeting, located next to the balcony Arcadia door was dark gray/yellow in color. A blue chair was observed to be heavily soiled and spotted with what appeared to be food. The toilet bowl was observed to be heavily stained and discolored. 2. During an interview, E1 stated "The resident doesn't keep the room clean, we think the stain near the Arcadia door is urine. We are moving the resident to a room with tile floors." 3. Review of the facility policies and procedures indicated the premises and equipment will be maintained in a clean condition. 4. During an interview, E1 acknowledged the section of carpeting and equipment was not clean.

Feb 14, 2024Complaint

This revised Statement of Deficiencies (SOD) replaces the SOD sent on March 4, 2024. The following deficiencies were found during the compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00194200 and AZ00199979 conducted on February 14, 2024.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-806.A.8.a-bCorrected Feb 22, 2024

Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that one of one sample personnel record contained evidence of freedom from infectious tuberculosis (TB), on or before the date the individual began providing services to residents as specified in R9-10-113. Findings include: 1. The record for E2 (Caregiver, hired December 7, 2022) contained documentation indicating that one TB test was administered. No other TB test documentation conducted within the past 12 months was found in the record. 2. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that the employee worked more than 8 hours per week and the documentation did not reflect that the employee record contained evidence of freedom from TB as specified in R9-10-113, prior to providing services to residents.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-816.D.2Corrected Mar 28, 2024

Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure that a current toxicology reference guide was available for use by personnel members. Findings include: 1. The toxicology guide available for use by personnel members was the Poisoning and Drug Overdose, 6th. edition. 2. The Internet web site for the toxicology guide revealed that a more current edition was available for distribution. 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that a current toxicology reference guide was not available for use by personnel members.

A manager shall ensure that:R9-10-818.A.6.a-eCorrected Feb 15, 2024

Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure that documentation of each evacuation drill was created and maintained for 12 months after the date of the evacuation drill that included: An identification of all residents needing assistance for evacuation, and an identification of all residents who were not evacuated. Findings include: 1. Review of 12 months of facility evacuation drill documentation revealed that the documentation failed to identify the following: An identification of all residents needing assistance for evacuation and all residents who were not evacuated. 2. During an interview, E1 stated, "We do have directed care residents here and others who would need assistance and some who may not evacuate." 3. During an interview, E1 acknowledged the required documentation was not available for review.

Tuberculosis ScreeningR9-10-113.A.2.cCorrected Apr 5, 2024

Based on record review and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to ensure that the health care institution established, documented, and implemented tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually providing training and education related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB) to individuals providing services for the health care institution. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for E1 failed to reveal documentation indicating that annual training related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB had been completed. No TB training documentation was available for review. 2. Review of the record for E2 failed to reveal documentation indicating that annual training related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB had been completed. No TB training documentation was available for review. 3. Review of the record for E3 failed to reveal documentation indicating that annual training related to recognizing the signs and symptoms of TB had been completed. No TB training documentation was available for review. 4. During an interview, E1 acknowledge that the required documentation was not available.

Tuberculosis ScreeningR9-10-113.A.2.dCorrected Mar 10, 2024

Based on documentation review and interview, the chief administrative officer failed to ensure that the health care institution establishes, documents, and implements tuberculosis infection control activities that included annually assessing the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. Findings include: 1. Review of facility documentation failed to reveal an annual assessment of the health care institution's risk of exposure to infectious tuberculosis. 2. During an interview, E1 acknowledged that the required documentation was not available for review.

Jan 9, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies were found during the investigation of complaint AZ00204906 conducted on January 9, 2024.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call