Assisted Living · Clyde, NC
65 Loving Way, Clyde, NC 28721
About this listing
Catalog updated Aug 3, 2026. Current services and availability are unconfirmed.
Monthly cost
Ask for the full monthly cost, including care fees and one-time charges.
Availability
We don't have live openings. Ask about current availability, waiting lists, and move-in timing.
Reported capacity: 20 residents. This is not the number of openings.
Contact information →Care & support
Usually offers housing and help with everyday tasks, such as bathing and dressing.
This describes the care category. Confirm support for your family member's needs.
Understand care types →Payment options
Payment details are not confirmed in our records. Ask about private pay, insurance, and assistance programs.
Your next step
You don't need to know everything. Start with these questions.
Public Google reviews reflect mixed experiences. Compare recent comments, ask how concerns are addressed, and visit to see whether the care meets your family’s needs. Online feedback is one perspective, not a clinical assessment.
Families should exercise extreme caution as recent reviews indicate a significant decline in care quality, specifically regarding memory care and weekend staffing. While some past experiences highlighted a caring nursing staff, recent reports cite serious concerns regarding medical oversight, lack of resident engagement, and inadequate response to emergencies.
AI summaries of public opinions. These describe review sentiment, not verified care quality.
While some praise the nurses and training, recent reviews allege poor medical oversight and neglect.
Reviews are split between praise for quick notification of incidents and claims that management does not listen.
One reviewer noted a lack of food choices leading to declining health for a resident.
A recent review highlights a lack of activities and residents staying in their rooms.
A recent reviewer noted that conditions in the memory care cottage went bad quickly.
Scores range from 0 (negative) to 10 (positive). They are model interpretations of reviews and are not clinical, safety, or inspection ratings. Unmentioned topics are omitted.
Strengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 13 analyzed
Key Review Excerpts
“Sarah called us very quickly and had everything ready when we got there to take her to the doctor. She seems to genuinely care about her patients.”
“Very disappointed in lack of activities or things for residents to do. They eat, and stay in their rooms! No interaction with anyone, which is not good for anyone!”
“The only ones that care are the nurses. The doctor is just a PA, not an MD AND COULD CARE LESS ABOUT your loved one in their care.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled medication aides had completed the required 10-hour medication aide training within 60 days of employment. While the staff member had completed 5-hour training and clinical skills validation, there was no documentation verifying the completion of the 10-hour course.
The facility failed to protect three out of five sampled residents from harm related to Resident #2, who had a known history of aggressive and possessive behaviors. Evidence showed that staff failed to prevent physical assaults, including hitting, slapping, and punching, and failed to take adequate action to move the aggressor despite multiple reports of bullying and physical injury.
The facility failed to protect residents from harm related to a resident with known aggressive behaviors. Specifically, staff failed to prevent Resident #2 from hitting, bullying, and physically intimidating other residents, including causing bruising and attempting to lock residents in bathrooms.
The facility failed to ensure at least one staff member was on duty at all times during the third shift to provide personal care and supervision. Interviews and record reviews revealed that staff members frequently had to float between four different buildings, leaving certain buildings completely unstaffed during the night. Documentation of time clock punches confirmed instances where staffing levels dropped below the required coverage for the facility.
The facility failed to ensure at least one staff member was on duty at all times during the third shift to provide supervision and personal care. Interviews with residents revealed that the medication aide frequently had to float between four different buildings, leaving the building without staff presence during certain periods. Additionally, the December 2023 staffing schedule failed to specify which staff members were assigned to each individual facility.
The facility failed to ensure at least one staff member was on duty at all times during the evening shift to provide supervision to residents. Interviews with residents revealed instances where staff left the building to assist at other facilities, leaving residents unsupervised and unable to receive assistance when calling for help. Specifically, one resident reported being left in a puddle of urine for approximately one hour after a fall because no staff were present in the building.
The facility failed to ensure that at least one staff member was on duty at all times during the evening shift to provide necessary supervision to the residents. This failure represents a continuation of a previous Type B violation that was not abated.
The facility failed to maintain adequate staffing coverage as required by the census. The facility must ensure that when the administrator is not on duty, there is at least one staff member on duty for all shifts, and the facility must address instances where there is not enough coverage in each building.
The facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled staff members had documentation of successful completion of the required 80-hour personal care training and competency evaluation program. Specifically, a PCA hired on 04/26/21 had not completed the training despite being provided with the necessary links and multiple opportunities to do so.
Contact the provider directly when you feel ready. Have your questions handy and ask for answers in writing.
65 Loving Way, Clyde, NC 28721
Confirm current status with NC Division of Health Service Regulation.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
13 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby places may offer different services. Check care type and availability as you compare.
Spicewood Cottages Elms
< 1 miAssisted Living · Clyde, NC
Spicewood Cottages Meadows
< 1 miAssisted Living · Clyde, NC
Spicewood Cottages Oaks
< 1 miAssisted Living · Clyde, NC
Smoky Mountain Health and Rehabilitation Center
1.2 miNursing Home · Waynesville, NC
Skyland Terrace and Rehabilitation
3.0 miNursing Home · Waynesville, NC
Chestnut Park Retirement Center
3.3 miAssisted Living · Waynesville, NC
Keep this place handy
Optional: get a one-time email with this profile. You can also save or share it without an email address.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.