Limited public data on Residence at Skyway Park LLC, the. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 17 Google reviews
Email Residence at Skyway Park LLC, the to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit Residence at Skyway Park LLC, the in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
The Residence at Skyway Park receives highly polarized feedback, with some families praising the compassionate staff and resident happiness, while others report serious concerns regarding neglect and facility maintenance. Critics highlight issues with food quality, understaffing, and safety, whereas supporters emphasize the facility's cleanliness and responsive management.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 18 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“My mom and brother have lived at Skyway Park for a little over four years and they are both very happy there. The ALF staff seem to genuinely care about their comfort and well-being.”
“My mom stayed here for 6 months before I pulled her out. Rude unprofessional staff dirty rooms my mom lost 40 pounds and nearly died lack of care she said the food was like eating wet cardboard.”
“This place is understaffed, they spend very little money on food or cooks, and the activities director has an impossible budget. The activities van cannot accommodate wheelchairs.”
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A certification complaint, prompted by #CO41081 was completed on 11/18/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the facility (residence) failed to provide sufficient support to members (residents) in the use of prescription and non-prescription medications, affecting five of nine sample residents (#3, #4, #23, #27, and #31).This deficiency was cited previously during a complaint investigation that concluded on 6/3/25. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:1. Administration of medications without authorized practitioner' s orders.a. Resident #31 was admitted to the residence on 2/2/21.The August 2025 and September 2025 medication administration records (MAR) had the following medications listed and were being administered with no signed and dated practitioners' orders on file: ferrous gluconate, preserVision, and tamsulosin HCl.b. Similar deficient practice was found for Resident #3. Additionally, Resident #3' s MAR did not match the signed and dated practitioner orders provided.c. InterviewOn 9/16/25 at 1:06 p.m., the resident care coordinator acknowledged they did not have all the practitioners' orders for the medications being administered by the residence. He explained that the residence received the medication orders from the practitioner, and what was liste.. Based on record review and interview, the facility (residence) failed to meet minimum staffing numbers affecting 49 current members (residents).Findings include: 1. Record Review The staff schedule for October and November 2025 revealed that there were fewer than one staff member for every 16 members during the overnight shift for the following dates: 10/1/25-10/31/25 from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.11/1/25-11/18/25 from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 2. Interviews On 11/18/25 at 3:42 p.m., the administrator stated he was not aware of the staffing ratio regulation. On 11/18/25 at 3:55 p.m., the resident care coordinator stated she was not aware of the staffing ratio regulation and thought the residence only needed a certain number of staff based on resident needs.
A complaint revisit was completed on 11/18/25 for the previous deficiency cited on 6/3/25. A deficiency was cited.The deficiency cited for Event J5OT13 was cited prior to the regulation revision that was implemented 9/30/25. Based on interview and record review, the facility (residence) failed to provide sufficient support to members (residents) in the use of prescription and non-prescription medications, affecting five of nine sample residents (#3, #4, #23, #27, and #31).This deficiency was cited previously during a complaint investigation that concluded on 6/3/25. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement. Findings include:1. Administration of medications without authorized practitioner' s orders.a. Resident #31 was admitted to the residence on 2/2/21.The August 2025 and September 2025 medication administration records (MAR) had the following medications listed and were being administered with no signed and dated practitioners' orders on file: ferrous gluconate, preserVision, and tamsulosin HCl.b. Similar deficient practice was found for Resident #3. Additionally, Resident #3' s MAR did not match the signed and dated practitioner orders provided.c. InterviewOn 9/16/25 at 1:06 p.m., the resident care coordinator acknowledged they did not have all the practitioners' orders for the medications being administered by the residence. He explained that the residence received the medication orders from the practitioner, and what was listed on the MAR was correct. He stated he was unsure why they had missing orders for the medications being administered or why the MAR had not matched the practitioner' s orders provided specifically for Resident #3. He stated he would expect the MAR to match the practitioner' s order and to have all the practitioner' s orders for medications being administered.On 9/16/25 at 3:16 p.m., the administrator explained that the residence received practitioners' orders from the practitioners, the residents had their medication list signed by the practitioner when they had a practitioner' s appointment, or the residence received a signed medication list from the practitioner quarterly. The administrator st..
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
17 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit residenceatskywaypark.com
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Brookside Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Constant Care V Cheyenne
< 1 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Constant Care IV Woodburn
1.0 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Gardens at Broadmoor Court, the
1.2 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Bear Creek Senior Living
1.4 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Brookdale Broadmoor
1.7 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO