Limited public data on Regency Pullman. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 10 Google reviews
Email Regency Pullman to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit Regency Pullman in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
Regency Pullman receives polarized feedback, with some families praising the caring staff and engaging activities, while others express significant frustration regarding cleanliness and staffing levels. While short-term rehab patients report positive experiences with care and facility maintenance, long-term residents' families have raised concerns about inconsistent communication and the quality of daily care.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 12 analyzed
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“This is a great place! I had surgery and needed to recover here for two weeks. The food is good and Regency is very clean. The staff is very caring and took care of all my needs.”
“The girls who work on the floor are decent --- their hearts always seemed in the right place. But the lack of communication, the low level of medical care, the lousy food and the non-existent activities were always a grinding reality.”
Source: WA Dept. of Social & Health Services
The document states that all violations noted during previous related inspection(s) have been corrected and the current status is Approved.
Recurring deficiencies noted for WAC 388-78A-2140, 388-78A-2320, and 388-78A-2466.; The document is labeled as page 9 of 9 and includes a blank Plan/Attestation Statement section to be filled out by the administrator.
Facility failed to ensure a background check was submitted prior to expiration for a staff member.
Facility failed to follow nurse delegation procedures (assessment, competency evaluation, and written consent) for a resident receiving blood glucose sensor injections.
Facility failed to perform monthly weight monitoring as required by the resident's service plan.
The facility failed to ensure a Washington state name and date of birth background check was submitted to the department prior to expiration for 1 of 5 staff members (Staff E). The staff member's background check lapsed between 07/01/2024 and 04/03/2025. This was a recurring deficiency.
Facility failed to have a written agreement in place for family medication assistance, leading to missed doses for a resident.
Facility failed to ensure skin integrity monitoring was documented for a resident with a known skin condition.
Letter dated 07/02/2025 indicates that the deficiencies listed (WAC 388-78A-2480-1, 2474-4, 2474-2, 2474-2-a, 2474-2-b, 2474-2-c, 2474-2-d, 2474-2-e) were corrected.
Facility failed to ensure staff were screened for tuberculosis within three days of employment for 3 of 6 sampled staff.
Facility failed to ensure 1 of 6 sampled staff obtained home care aide certification.
Follow-up inspection on 03/03/2025 indicated that deficiencies WAC 388-78A-2462-2-a, WAC 388-78A-2462-2-b, and WAC 388-78A-2462-2 were corrected.
The facility failed to ensure one staff member had a national fingerprint background check on file, which was not attempted until over 6 months after the hire date.
A separate follow-up letter dated 04/19/2024 notes that deficiencies WAC 388-78A-2140-1-a-iii, WAC 388-78A-2140-2-a, and WAC 388-78A-2140-5 were corrected.
Facility failed to include interventions for problem behaviors in Negotiated Service Plans for 4 of 6 sampled residents, placing them at risk of harm.
Follow-up inspection on 04/19/2024 found this deficiency corrected.
Facility failed to ensure two medication aides received required nurse delegation training or held required nursing assistant/home care aide licenses prior to administering medicated eye drops to a resident.
A follow-up letter dated 04/16/2024 notes that these deficiencies were corrected and the facility meets licensing requirements.; The report highlights a systemic culture of staff disregarding resident refusal of care and utilizing physical restraint under the direction of the Executive Director (Staff A). Multiple instances of failure to report abuse/neglect to the department and law enforcement in a timely manner are documented.
Facility failed to ensure 7 of 8 staff members reviewed had completed required national fingerprint background checks.
The facility failed to protect residents from physical restraint and violated the right to refuse unwanted care. Staff (specifically the Executive Director and others under their instruction) repeatedly physically restrained Resident 1 against their wishes to force care, and failed to timely report allegations of abuse and neglect for Resident 1 and Resident 2.
Facility failed to ensure staff made immediate reports to the department and law enforcement regarding suspected physical abuse for 2 residents.
Facility failed to ensure staff work references were verified prior to hiring for 7 of 9 staff members reviewed.
Facility failed to protect a resident from abuse during the course of an investigation, resulting in staff being instructed to physically restrain the resident.
Facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 staff members reviewed completed required specialized training for dementia prior to providing care.
Facility failed to ensure 7 of 7 staff members reviewed obtained required home care aide certification.
The inspection on 09/11/2023 confirmed all violations noted during previous related inspection(s) have been corrected.
Facility failed to provide documentation of annual testing of fire doors meeting NFPA 80 requirements.
Facility failed to complete Annual Forward Flow test and 5 Year Backflow Valve Internal Pipe exam.
Second floor resident laundry room failed to latch.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
10 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit regency-pacific.com
WA DSHS — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Bishop Place Senior Living
1.5 miAssisted Living · Pullman, WA
L.m.k., INC.
1.7 miSupported Living · Pullman, WA
Three Creeks Post Acute
2.0 miNursing Home · Pullman, WA
Aspen Park of Cascadia
9.8 miNursing Home · Moscow, ID