Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and dedicated care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 86 Google reviews

Email Palisades at Broadmoor Park, the to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Palisades at Broadmoor Park, the highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and dedicated care staff, beautiful, well-maintained facility. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
The Palisades at Broadmoor Park is a senior living community that receives high praise for its compassionate, dedicated staff and beautiful, well-maintained facility. However, families should be aware of significant, recurring concerns regarding communication responsiveness, understaffing in memory care, and inconsistent quality of care during off-hours.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 88 analyzed
This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staffing is abysmal, multiple times I walked in to find no one on his memory care floor, one day there was one person in the entire facility; the workers are spread too thin and not given the tools to do what is needed.”
“I watched their nurse sit with a new resident who was moving in and didn't communicate well for over an hour because he was so upset. At the end of that time, he was calm and cooperative.”
“My grandmother lived her final days in a urine soaked bed, due to complete lack of care. Do not trust their “continuous care”.”
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38417, was completed on 2/19/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to ensure residents were free from abuse affecting one of four sample residents (#1). (Cross-reference S1400, S1410, S3050, and S3076)Specifically, Former Staff #6 was terminated from her position after an incident which she was involved in, where Resident #1 was found with the skin of her left hand pulled back from her wrist to her knuckles.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the residence on 4/30/23 with a diagnosis of dementia.A progress note dated 9/14/24 read that Former Staff #6 was suspected of abuse when she reported that Resident #1 had a skin tear on her hand. Other staff at the time reported that they did.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to have an internal process to ensure the prompt handling of grievances and complaints recorded in a visible on-site location, affecting 21 current residents in the secured environment. (Cross-reference S1322, S1410, S3050, and S3076)Findings include:On 2/18/25 at approximately 10:30 a.m., the grievances and complaints that the residence received in the last 90 days, and their resolutions, were requested and not provided. On 2/18/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Confidential Staff #1 stated that s/he informed her supervision on multiple occasions about the misconduct of Former Staff #6, but there was no resolution and s/he .. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to investigate allegations of abuse affecting 21 current residents in the secured environment. (Cross-reference S1322, S1400, S3050, and S3076)Findings include:A team member action plan document dated 9/13/23 read that Former Staff #6 was reprimanded for unprofessional and disrespectful behavior towards residents. A record of conversation document dated 3/18/24 read that Former Staff #6 was talked to about respecting residents and not rushing residents during medication pass. On 2/18/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Confidential Staff #1 stated that s/he informed the director that Former Staff #6 was disre.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to provide each staff member with a minimum of six hours of dementia/cognitive impairment training, affecting 21 current residents in the secured environment. (Cross-reference S1322, S1400, S1410, and S3050)Findings include:Personnel files revealed Staff #2 was hired on 11/26/24. On 2/18/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., personnel files were reviewed. There was no training for dementia in Staff #2' s file.On 2/18/25 at approximately 1:02 p.m., the administrator stated that she was aware of the requirements for dementia training and she was aware that Staff #2 was missing this training and that the residence .. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to re-asses residents in the secured environment every six months affecting two of four sample residents (#1, #2). (Cross-reference S1322, S1400, S1410, and S3076)Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/22 with a diagnosis of dementia.On 2/18/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Staff #4 stated that Resident #2 was usually very aware.On 2/18/25 at 8:40 a.m., Resident #2 stated that she did not belong in a secure environment and that she told the administrator this and felt alone.On 2/18/25 at approximately 1:30 p.m., the administrator stated that she was aware that Resident #2 did not believe th..
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
86 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit mbkseniorliving.com
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Constant Care III Loma Linda
1.6 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Constant Care VI Oakridge
1.6 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Westmark House
1.6 miAssisted Living · Colorado, CO
Westmark House
1.6 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Myron Stratton Home, the
1.8 miAssisted Living · Colorado Springs, CO
Mountain View Post Acute
1.9 miNursing Home · Colorado Springs, CO