See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Assisted Living

Palisades at Broadmoor Park, the

Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and dedicated care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.

4547 Palisades Park Vw, Colorado Springs, CO 8090677 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
Google rating
4.2/5

based on 85 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Palisades at Broadmoor Park, the Assisted Living in Colorado Springs, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Palisades at Broadmoor Park, the

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

While many families praise the facility's activities and specific staff members, there is a concerning pattern of management being unresponsive to serious complaints. We strongly recommend that you visit during off-hours or weekends to observe staffing levels for yourself and ask for a clear policy on how they handle communication with families during emergencies.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

85 reviews on Google
The Palisades at Broadmoor Park is a senior living community that receives high praise for its compassionate, dedicated staff and beautiful, well-maintained facility. However, families should be aware of significant, recurring concerns regarding communication responsiveness, understaffing in memory care, and inconsistent quality of care during off-hours.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food6.0Staff8.0Clean8.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemory4.0Comms3.0Value4.0

Strengths

  • Compassionate and dedicated care staff
  • Beautiful, well-maintained facility
  • Engaging activities and programming
  • Strong leadership team

Concerns

  • Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from management (mentioned by 4 reviewers)
  • Understaffing in memory care and slow response times (mentioned by 3 reviewers)
  • Inconsistent quality of meals (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'15(2)'17(3)'19(14)'22(4)'24(26)'26(6)

Distribution · 87 analyzed

5
62
4
9
3
3
2
1
1
12

How They Respond to Reviews

97%response rate

This facility actively engages with reviewer feedback.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1I noticed you are very active in responding to feedback online; what is your preferred process for keeping families updated on their loved one's daily well-being?
  • 2With the memory care program being a specialized area, what specific training or staffing adjustments have you implemented to ensure residents receive prompt attention?
  • 3I see the facility offers a robust activity calendar; could you walk me through how you tailor these programs to keep residents engaged throughout the week?
  • 4How does your management team handle family inquiries or concerns to ensure that communication remains consistent and responsive?
  • 5We understand that dining is a major part of daily life; how do you gather resident feedback to ensure the meal quality meets everyone's expectations?
  • 6In the event of a medical concern or emergency, what is the specific protocol for notifying family members and coordinating with outside healthcare providers?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staffing is abysmal, multiple times I walked in to find no one on his memory care floor, one day there was one person in the entire facility; the workers are spread too thin and not given the tools to do what is needed.

Memory care family member · 2022☆☆☆☆

I watched their nurse sit with a new resident who was moving in and didn't communicate well for over an hour because he was so upset. At the end of that time, he was calm and cooperative.

Visitor · 2024☆☆☆☆

My grandmother lived her final days in a urine soaked bed, due to complete lack of care. Do not trust their “continuous care”.

Memory care family member · 2022☆☆☆☆
Source: 85 Google reviews

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
3deficiencies
Mar 17, 2026Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

May 6, 2025Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Feb 18, 2025Complaint
N/A0000, 1322, 1400 and 3 more

A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38417, was completed on 2/19/25. Deficiencies were cited. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to ensure residents were free from abuse affecting one of four sample residents (#1). (Cross-reference S1400, S1410, S3050, and S3076)Specifically, Former Staff #6 was terminated from her position after an incident which she was involved in, where Resident #1 was found with the skin of her left hand pulled back from her wrist to her knuckles.Findings include:Resident #1 was admitted to the residence on 4/30/23 with a diagnosis of dementia.A progress note dated 9/14/24 read that Former Staff #6 was suspected of abuse when she reported that Resident #1 had a skin tear on her hand. Other staff at the time reported that they did.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to have an internal process to ensure the prompt handling of grievances and complaints recorded in a visible on-site location, affecting 21 current residents in the secured environment. (Cross-reference S1322, S1410, S3050, and S3076)Findings include:On 2/18/25 at approximately 10:30 a.m., the grievances and complaints that the residence received in the last 90 days, and their resolutions, were requested and not provided. On 2/18/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Confidential Staff #1 stated that s/he informed her supervision on multiple occasions about the misconduct of Former Staff #6, but there was no resolution and s/he .. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to investigate allegations of abuse affecting 21 current residents in the secured environment. (Cross-reference S1322, S1400, S3050, and S3076)Findings include:A team member action plan document dated 9/13/23 read that Former Staff #6 was reprimanded for unprofessional and disrespectful behavior towards residents. A record of conversation document dated 3/18/24 read that Former Staff #6 was talked to about respecting residents and not rushing residents during medication pass. On 2/18/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Confidential Staff #1 stated that s/he informed the director that Former Staff #6 was disre.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to provide each staff member with a minimum of six hours of dementia/cognitive impairment training, affecting 21 current residents in the secured environment. (Cross-reference S1322, S1400, S1410, and S3050)Findings include:Personnel files revealed Staff #2 was hired on 11/26/24. On 2/18/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., personnel files were reviewed. There was no training for dementia in Staff #2' s file.On 2/18/25 at approximately 1:02 p.m., the administrator stated that she was aware of the requirements for dementia training and she was aware that Staff #2 was missing this training and that the residence .. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to re-asses residents in the secured environment every six months affecting two of four sample residents (#1, #2). (Cross-reference S1322, S1400, S1410, and S3076)Findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the residence on 8/31/22 with a diagnosis of dementia.On 2/18/25 at approximately 8:30 a.m., Staff #4 stated that Resident #2 was usually very aware.On 2/18/25 at 8:40 a.m., Resident #2 stated that she did not belong in a secure environment and that she told the administrator this and felt alone.On 2/18/25 at approximately 1:30 p.m., the administrator stated that she was aware that Resident #2 did not believe th..

Nov 14, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 14, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Nov 14, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Sep 27, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Aug 19, 2024Complaint
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call