Limited public data on Golden Lodge Assisted Living LLC. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 54 Google reviews
Email Golden Lodge Assisted Living LLC to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Every family's needs are unique. We encourage you to visit Golden Lodge Assisted Living LLC in person, speak with staff and current residents' families, and trust your instincts. The data on this page provides a starting point, but your personal impression matters most.
Golden Lodge Assisted Living receives highly polarized feedback, with many families praising the compassionate care and beautiful facility, while others report significant issues with management, communication, and staffing levels. Recent reviews suggest an effort by new leadership to improve operations, though persistent complaints regarding responsiveness and care consistency remain a point of contention for some families.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 47 analyzed
This facility responds to some reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The memory care wing was comfortable and well thought out place for my father to spend his final days; I hope to be so lucky. This memory care is different from all others; smaller "neighborhoods" with less chaos makes the adds peace and serenity.”
“No leadership. Understaffed!! Very unorganized. Don't be fooled by the nice building. I had my mother stay 4 days in respite care. Half of what they pomised never happened...including missing 2 medication schedules.”
“My experience was not a good one, my FIL was at this place for 6 months and nothing was what it seemed. This was a lot of constant follow up and frustration. This place will give you a lot of promises when you are touring but they DO NOT follow through.”
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
No deficiencies are reported in this inspection record.
A licensure complaint, prompted by #CO38186, was completed on 5/14/25. A deficiency was cited. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the residence failed to provide therapeutic diets when prescribed by the resident' s practitioner, affecting one of eight sample residents (#39). Findings include:1. Resident #39 was admitted to the residence on 7/24/23 with a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder, dysphagia, and had a diet of pureed food and nectar-thick liquids. a. ObservationsOn 5/12/25, at 8:35 a.m., Staff #33 administered Resident #39' s medication in applesauce and then handed him a cup of water with no thickened liquid powder added.On 5/12/25, at approximately 8:52 a.m., Resident #39' s family member fed him his pureed breakfast meal and beverage. Staff #50 added a scoop of the thickened liquid powder, stirred it, and handed it to Resident #39' s family member. Resident #39' s family member immediately gave Resident #39 his orange juice.On 5/12/25, at 8:59 a.m., Staff #33 looked at his computer, pulled up Resident #39' s chart, and read aloud that Resident #39 was on a mechanical soft diet and nectar-thickened liquid.On 5/12/25 at 11:38 a.m., Staff #33 searched the refrigerator and cabinet for the thickened liquid powder and did not find it. Staff #50 pointed out where the thickened powder container was to Staff #33.On 5/13/25 at 8:21 a.m., the administrator entered the secure unit, found the thickened liquid powder, removed it from the kitchen cabinet, and took it to the kitchen. b. Record Review A written practitioner' s order, dated 3/16/25, directed the residence to provide a nectar-thickened liquid diet. On 4/17/25, the external health provider amended the order to change his diet to pureed.The resident' s care plan, effective 5/12/25, had six amended dates for Resident #39' s dining and cueing needs. On 2/25/25 and 3/18/25, the residence added that Resident #39 needed nectar thickened liquid.2. Interviews On 5/12/25 at 8:57 a.m., Staff #33 stated he was unaware that Resident #39 had a nectar-thickened liquid; he thought he was on a mechanical soft diet and only had issues with chewing food, not swa..
A licensure revisit was completed on 5/13/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 10/21/24. The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised. The new regulation Chapter VII was implemented on 3/17/25. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to complete progress notes at the end of the shift, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary event or issue that affected the resident' s physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional condition, along with the action taken by staff to address that resident' s changing needs, affecting one of eight sample residents (#39).This deficiency was previously cited during a relicensure survey on 10/21/24. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:Resident #39 was admitted to the residence on 7/24/23 with a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder and dysphagia. a. ObservationsOn 5/12/25 at 8:35 a.m., Resident #39 had four pinky-sized flat-round reddish-purple bruises on his forehead. Two were above his right eyebrow, and two smaller ones were near his hairline. On 5/12/25, at approximately 8:51 a.m., Staff #50 asked Resident #39' s family member if she knew what had happened to his face. He continued to say that he had not noticed the marks on his face last week and had just returned this morning and saw them.On 5/12/25, at approximately 8:52 a.m., the family member of Resident #39 told Staff #50 she was unaware of what happened and that the residence di.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner' s orders associated with medication administration, affecting five of eight sample residents (#32, #42, #43, #44, #46).This deficiency was previously cited during a relicensure survey on 10/21/24. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. Resident #42 was admitted to the residence on 4/25/25 with diagnoses including Parkinson' s dementia.A written practitioner' s order, dated 4/25/25, directed the residence to administer the following medications: Lysine 1000 mg once daily.Meloxicam 15 mg once daily.Tizanidine 2 mg once daily.However, the April and May medication administration records (MARs) for Resident #42 read the following medications were not administered because they were not available:Lysine 1000 mg on 4/27-4/29 and 5/1-5/6/25 for a total of nine missed doses. Meloxicam 15 mg on 4/27-4/30 5/1, 5/2, 5/4, 5/6, 5/7, for a total of nine missed doses.Tizanidine 2 mg on 4/27-4/30, 5/1-5/7/25 for a total of 11 missed doses. On 5/13/25 at 9:30 a.m., the administrator confirmed the medications listed above were not administered and were out of stock for Resident #42. On 5/13/25 at 1:05 p.m., the administrator said the reason the..
A relicensure survey with complaint revisit was completed on 5/25/25 for all previous deficiencies cited on 10/21/24 . The regulations governing Assisted Living Residences were revised. The new regulation Chapter VII was implemented on 3/17/25. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to complete progress notes at the end of the shift, which included documentation regarding any out-of-the-ordinary event or issue that affected the resident' s physical, behavioral, cognitive, or functional condition, along with the action taken by staff to address that resident' s changing needs, affecting one of eight sample residents (#39).This deficiency was previously cited during a relicensure survey on 10/21/24. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:Resident #39 was admitted to the residence on 7/24/23 with a diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder and dysphagia. a. ObservationsOn 5/12/25 at 8:35 a.m., Resident #39 had four pinky-sized flat-round reddish-purple bruises on his forehead. Two were above his right eyebrow, and two smaller ones were near his hairline. On 5/12/25, at approximately 8:51 a.m., Staff #50 asked Resident #39' s family member if she knew what had happened to his face. He continued to say that he had not noticed the marks on his face last week and had just returned this morning and saw them.On 5/12/25, at approximately 8:52 a.m., the family member of Resident #39 told Staff #50 she was unaware of what happened and that the residence di.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to comply with authorized practitioner' s orders associated with medication administration, affecting five of eight sample residents (#32, #42, #43, #44, #46).This deficiency was previously cited during a relicensure survey on 10/21/24. Although the residence corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the residence has not maintained compliance with this regulatory requirement.Findings include:1. Resident #42 was admitted to the residence on 4/25/25 with diagnoses including Parkinson' s dementia.A written practitioner' s order, dated 4/25/25, directed the residence to administer the following medications: Lysine 1000 mg once daily.Meloxicam 15 mg once daily.Tizanidine 2 mg once daily.However, the April and May medication administration records (MARs) for Resident #42 read the following medications were not administered because they were not available:Lysine 1000 mg on 4/27-4/29 and 5/1-5/6/25 for a total of nine missed doses. Meloxicam 15 mg on 4/27-4/30 5/1, 5/2, 5/4, 5/6, 5/7, for a total of nine missed doses.Tizanidine 2 mg on 4/27-4/30, 5/1-5/7/25 for a total of 11 missed doses. On 5/13/25 at 9:30 a.m., the administrator confirmed the medications listed above were not administered and were out of stock for Resident #42. On 5/13/25 at 1:05 p.m., the administrator said the reason the..
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
54 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit goldenlodgeassisted.com
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Golden Pond LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Golden, CO
Assisted Living of Arvada INC
3.4 miAssisted Living · Arvada, CO
Morningstar of Arvada
3.4 miAssisted Living · Arvada, CO
Jaxpointe at 63rd Place Assisted Living
3.7 miAssisted Living · Golden, CO
Amira Choice Arvada
4.1 miAssisted Living · Arvada, CO
Gardens Care Homes - Quaker Acres, the
4.6 miAssisted Living · Arvada, CO