See every facility — official ratings, family reviews, no referral fees.
Nursing HomeMedicaid Top Rated

Frasier Meadows Health Care Center

Strong Medicare quality ratings; families often praise beautiful, well-maintained facility. Still worth an in-person visit.

4950 Thunderbird Dr, Frasier Meadows · Boulder, CO 8030354 bedsLicensed & Active
Source: CO CDPHE — view official record
5/5
Medicare
Inspection
Quality
Staffing
Google rating
4.4/5

based on 92 Google reviews

5
4
3
2
1
Frasier Meadows Health Care Center Nursing Home in Boulder, CO — Street View
Street View

Watch Frasier Meadows Health Care Center

Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.

We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

What this means for your family

Frasier Meadows is widely praised for its beautiful environment and high-quality care, making it a strong contender for long-term residency. However, families should be aware of potential staffing pressures; we recommend asking management about current staffing ratios and how they ensure timely responses to resident needs during peak and off-hours.

Google Reviews

Google Reviews

92 reviews on Google
Frasier Meadows Health Care Center is widely regarded as a beautiful, clean, and vibrant community with a strong reputation for compassionate care and high-quality facilities. While many families praise the staff's dedication and the abundance of activities, some reviewers have noted concerns regarding staff workload, occasional slow response times, and nighttime security.

Quality Themes

Tap a score for details
Food8.0Staff8.0Clean9.0Activities9.0MedsN/AMemory9.0CommsN/AValueN/A

Strengths

  • Beautiful, well-maintained facility
  • Compassionate and friendly staff
  • Abundance of activities and social engagement
  • Strong pandemic safety protocols

Concerns

  • Slow response times for staff assistance (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
  • Staff workload and burnout (mentioned by 2 reviewers)

Rating Trends

Tap a year to see what changed

234'16(1)'18(17)'20(11)'22(9)'24(7)'26(1)

Distribution · 95 analyzed

5
65
4
16
3
6
2
6
1
2

How They Respond to Reviews

57%response rate

This facility responds to some reviews.

Questions for Your Tour

  • 1Given the high staffing rating, how do you ensure that team members have the support they need to maintain consistent, prompt attention to resident requests throughout the day?
  • 2I noticed the facility has a vibrant social calendar; could you walk us through a few examples of how residents typically spend their afternoons here?
  • 3With your 5-star CMS staffing rating, what specific programs do you have in place to support staff well-being and prevent burnout?
  • 4Regarding the recent health inspection report, could you share the steps you’ve taken to address the single deficiency noted and how you are working to maintain your high standards?
  • 5How does your nursing team coordinate care and communicate with families during urgent medical situations or after-hours emergencies?
  • 6I appreciate that you engage with feedback online; how do you use input from families to continuously improve the daily experience for residents?

Personalized based on this facility's data


Key Review Excerpts

The staff is not only highly skilled but also incredibly compassionate and attentive, always going above and beyond to ensure the comfort and well-being of every resident. The facility itself is clean, welcoming, and well-maintained, providing a warm and safe environment.

Long-term resident's family · 2024★★★★★

CNAs are lazy, not helpful could not be bothered, most barely if at all speak english Nurses are for the most part nice but overworked because they are having to do CNA duties too.

Visitor/Observer · 2019★★★☆☆

Outstanding. One of the best nursing care, memory care and assisted living’s in the Denver metro area.

General visitor · 2025★★★★★
Source: 92 Google reviews

Staffing

Staffing Hours

per resident/day · Medicare 2026
RN Hours
1.20hrs
OK
Registered nurses for medical care
Total Nursing
5.12hrs
OK
All nurses + aides combined
Staff Turnover
26%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)
RN Turnover
47%
Lower is better (< 30% = good)

This facility meets the national staffing benchmarks. Higher staffing is linked to fewer falls and better day-to-day care.

Quality Measures

Quality Measures

Resident outcomes compared with national, state, and local averages · 17 measures

Medicare Rating
5/ 5
Better Than Avg

15

measures

Worse Than Avg

1

measures

Mixed Results

1

measures

Long-Stay Residents
💊

Residents on anti-anxiety or sleep medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility6.1%
Better than Avg
Here
6.1%
US
19.5%
CO
11.3%
Boulder
12.5%
🛏️

Residents needing more daily help over time

↓ Lower is better
This Facility2.7%
Better than Avg
Here
2.7%
US
14.4%
CO
13.8%
Boulder
12.7%
😔

Residents with depression symptoms

↓ Lower is better
This Facility1.1%
Better than Avg
Here
1.1%
US
12.1%
CO
8.5%
Boulder
11.3%

Highly dependent on how each facility screens and codes depressive symptoms, so it varies widely between facilities.

🚿

Residents whose bladder or bowel control got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility12.2%
Better than Avg
Here
12.2%
US
19.4%
CO
21.7%
Boulder
22.1%
💊

Residents on antipsychotic medication

↓ Lower is better
This Facility13.3%
Better than Avg
Here
13.3%
US
15.4%
CO
20.0%
Boulder
22.5%
🚶

Residents whose walking got worse

↓ Lower is better
This Facility8.7%
Better than Avg
Here
8.7%
US
15.3%
CO
14.4%
Boulder
16.4%
Short-Stay Residents (Rehab / Post-Acute)
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for pneumonia

↑ Higher is better
This Facility98.1%
Better than Avg
Here
98.1%
US
81.8%
CO
76.3%
Boulder
86.0%
💉

Short-stay residents vaccinated for the flu

↑ Higher is better
This Facility92.5%
Better than Avg
Here
92.5%
US
79.7%
CO
75.6%
Boulder
78.1%
💊

Short-stay residents newly given antipsychotics

↓ Lower is better
This Facility0.0%
Better than Avg
Here
0.0%
US
1.6%
CO
1.5%
Boulder
1.5%
Source: Medicare quality measures

US average from Medicare published data

Inspection History

Medicare Inspection History

3-year lookback · Medicare 2026

1deficiencies
3penalties
Well below state avg (8.8)
$49,202 in fines

Frasier Meadows has 28 deficiencies across three surveys with no complaint-triggered issues, indicating families haven't filed federal reports. The facility shows recurring problems with fire safety systems, accident prevention, and electrical equipment that persist across all surveys from 2021-2024. While all deficiencies have correction dates, the pattern of repeated fire safety and maintenance issues suggests ongoing infrastructure challenges families should discuss during visits.

Apr 16, 2024Routine
9
0686Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

0353Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

0712Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Miscellaneous Deficiencies

Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

0914Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Gas, Vacuum, and Electrical Systems Deficiencies

Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.

0918Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Gas, Vacuum, and Electrical Systems Deficiencies

Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

0222Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Egress Deficiencies

Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

0345Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

0511Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Services Deficiencies

Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

0363Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.

Jan 10, 2023Routine
7
0689Actual harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0353Potential for harm · Widespread

Smoke Deficiencies

Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

0345Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

0712Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Miscellaneous Deficiencies

Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

0918Potential for harm · WidespreadCorrected

Gas, Vacuum, and Electrical Systems Deficiencies

Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

0580Potential for harm · PatternCorrected

Resident Rights Deficiencies

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

0372Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

Sep 16, 2021Routine
12
0222Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Egress Deficiencies

Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.

0223Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Egress Deficiencies

Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

0291Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Egress Deficiencies

Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.

0341Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.

0353Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

0355Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Smoke Deficiencies

Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

0511Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Services Deficiencies

Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.

0781Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Miscellaneous Deficiencies

Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.

0610Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

0679Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

0689Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

0695Potential for harm · IsolatedCorrected

Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

Federal Penalties

Fine

Apr 16, 2024

$21,678

Fine

Oct 30, 2023

$13,762

Fine

Sep 11, 2023

$13,762

State Inspection History

State Inspections

Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment

10total
6deficiencies
Jul 30, 2024Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Jun 13, 2024Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

Jun 13, 2024Follow-up
CleanReport

No deficiencies found during this inspection.

May 8, 2024Routine
N/A0000, 0222, 0345 and 6 more

Based on a record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the fire alarm system components and devices in accordance with the Life Safety Code Section 9.6 and NFPA 72.1.Annual report shows that detectors were missed in elevators shaftsNFPA 101, Section 9.6.1.5* To ensure operational integrity, the fire alarm system shall have an approved maintenance and testing program complying with the applicable requirements of NFPA 70, National Elec.. Based on documentation review, it was determined that the facility did not maintain proper electrical practices in accordance with NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code (2012). This was evidenced by:1.No written record of the continuity of the grounding circuit, polarity of hot and neutral connections, and retention force of the grounding blade in patient care was conducted annually. NFPA Standard: NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code (2012)6.3.3.2 Receptacl.. Based on observation and record review during the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the back-up emergency generator in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 110. This was evidence by the following1. Facility missing multiple monthly generator reports | Battery Conductance | Transfer Times 2. Generator 2022 report stated wiring not installed through conduits and against sharp edges8.1.1 The routin.. Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange and maintain the means of egress in accordance with Life Safety Code Section 7.2.1.4.5.11. E/F Hall egress doors take more that 15-lbs of pressure to put in motionNFPA 101 7.2.1.4.5.1 The forces required to fully open any door leaf manually in a means of egress shall not exceed 15 lbf (67 N) to release the latch, 30 lbf (133 N) to set the leaf in motion, and 15 lbf (67 N) to.. Based on observation during the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper gas valve protection in accordance with Life Safety Section 9.1and NFPA 54, 7.9.2.1. Also electrical wiring iaw NFPA 70 (11)1.High altitude orifices needed for dryers2. Daisy chain power cord in FA room NFPA 101, 9.1.1 Gas. Equipment using gas and related gas piping shall be in accordance with NFPA 54, National Fuel Gas Code. NFPA 54, 11.1.2 High A.. Based on observation it was determined the facility failed to maintain corridor doors in accordance with NFPA 101.1. Main hall office fire door not latching NFPA 80 5.2.1* Fire door assemblies shall be inspected and tested not less than annually, and a written record of the inspection shall be signed and kept for inspection by the AHJ.NFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.1* Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exi.. Based on observations and records review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the automatic sprinkler system in accordance with National Fire Protection Association NFPA 25 and NFPA 1011.Sprinkler escutcheon missing fire alarm room 2.Missing 3 year dry system full trip test report | Testing was conducted May 16, 2023 no report available to review 3.Facility needs additional sprinkler heads in stock in sprinkler head boxNFPA 101: 4.6.12... Based on record review, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct fire drills in accordance with the Life Safety Code, Section 19.7.1.61.Fire drills closer than hour apart during the last 12 months NFPA 101, 19.7.1.6 Drills shall be conducted quarterly on each shift to familiarize facility personnel (nurses, interns, maintenance engineers, and administrative staff) with the signals and emergency action required under varied conditions.This deficiency has .. This survey was conducted on May 08, 2024 for compliance with the National Fire Protection Association, (NFPA 101) Life Safety Code (2012) Chapter 19 "Existing Health Care Occupancies."This facility is a two (2) story, Type II (111) construction with a protected non-combustible structure with a partial basement area occupied as a parking garage.The first floor is known as the Garden Level and the second floor is known as the Main Level. Each floor is arr..

Apr 16, 2024Routine
N/A0000 & 0686

A recertification survey was conducted from 4/10/24 to 4/16/24. One deficiency was cited. An Emergency Preparedness survey was conducted from 4/10/24 to 4/16/24. No deficiencies were cited. Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#31) of three residents reviewed for pressure-related skin conditions out of 19 sample residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from developing.Resident #31, who was at risk for developing pressure injuries due to a recent surgery to replace his left hip joint, was admitted to the facility on 3/8/24. According to the facility' s assessment of the resident' s skin on 3/8/24, the resident was admitted without any pressure injuries.The facility implemented a pressure reducing mattress upon the resident' s admission, however, there were no interventions implemented for offloading the resident' s heels, which were at an increased risk for skin breakdown due to the resident' s decrease in mobility following the left hip surgery. On 3/11/24, a left heel blister was observed to the resident' s left heel and a right heel blister developed later that same day. The facility did begin appropriate treatment of the wounds and implemented further interventions to address offloading the resident' s heels after the wounds were identified, however, they failed to implement appropriate interventions of heel booties or an air mattress overlay until after the wounds developed.Despite providing treatment to the wounds after they developed and implementing..

Apr 16, 2024Other
N/A0000 & 0703

A licensure survey was completed on 4/10/24 to 4/17/24. One deficiency was cited. Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#31) of three residents reviewed for pressure-related skin conditions out of 19 sample residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers from developing.Resident #31, who was at risk for developing pressure injuries due to a recent surgery to replace his left hip joint, was admitted to the facility on 3/8/24. According to the facility' s assessment of the resident' s skin on 3/8/24, the resident was admitted without any pressure injuries.The facility implemented a pressure reducing mattress upon the resident' s admission, however, there were no interventions implemented for offloading the resident' s heels, which were at an increased risk for skin breakdown due to the resident' s decrease in mobility following the left hip surgery. On 3/11/24, a left heel blister was observed to the resident' s left heel and a right heel blister developed later that same day. The facility did begin appropriate treatment of the wounds and implemented further interventions to address offloading the resident' s heels after the wounds were identified, however, they failed to implement appropriate interventions of heel booties or an air mattress overlay until after the wounds developed.Despite providing treatment to the wounds after they developed and implementing further interventions, Resident #31' s wounds continued to worsen. The resident was discharged to the hospital on 3/27/24 for further treatment of the wounds. Once at the hospital, Resident #31' s heel wounds required surgical debridement down to the bone. Due to the facility' s failures to identify upon admission that Resident #31 was at risk for pressure injuries related to his recent hip surgery and the facility' s failure to implement timely interventions to offload and protect the resident' s heels, Resident #31 developed pressure wounds to both of his heels within three days of his admission which resulted in his discharge to the hospital 16 days after the wounds developed for further ..

Nov 13, 2023Routine
N/A0884

Based on record review, the facility failed to report complete information about COVID-19 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention' s (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) during a seven-day period that reporting was required by regulation.The CDC submitted data from the NHSN to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Based on review of that data, CMS determined that between 11/06/2023 and 11/12/2023, the facility did not report complete information to NHSN about COVID-19 in the standardized format and frequency as specified by CMS and the CDC. This failure to report has the potential to cause more than minimal harm to all residents residing in the facility.

Nov 6, 2023Routine
N/A0884

Based on record review, the facility failed to report complete information about COVID-19 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention' s (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) during a seven-day period that reporting was required by regulation.The CDC submitted data from the NHSN to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Based on review of that data, CMS determined that between 10/30/2023 and 11/05/2023, the facility did not report complete information to NHSN about COVID-19 in the standardized format and frequency as specified by CMS and the CDC. This failure to report has the potential to cause more than minimal harm to all residents residing in the facility.

Ownership & Operations

Who Operates This Facility

Owner / Operator

Frasier Meadows Health Care Center

Organization Type

nonprofit

Ownership & Management

Owners

Lewis, Nikki

Owner

Key personnel

Mcparland, MichelleOfficer / DirectorLewis, NikkiOfficer / DirectorMcparland, MichelleManagerLewis, NikkiAdp of the SnfMcparland, MichelleAdp of the Snf
Source: Medicare provider data

Contact

Get in Touch

Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.

References & Resources

EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.

Nearby Alternatives

Call