Dempsey's Adult Care Home
Limited public data on Dempsey's Adult Care Home. Call, tour, and ask to meet current residents' families — your own impression matters most.
based on 10 Google reviews
Watch Dempsey's Adult Care Home
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
While some families have had wonderful experiences with the staff's loving approach, recent reviews raise alarming concerns regarding resident supervision and facility cleanliness. If you consider this home, you must personally verify the safety protocols for wandering residents and inspect the living conditions for hygiene and pests.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
10 reviews on Google“Reviewers are deeply divided, with some families praising the staff for treating residents like family and providing a loving environment. However, recent and severe allegations regarding neglect, lack of supervision, and poor cleanliness present significant red flags that require careful investigation.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate, family-like care from staff
- Responsive ownership
- Accessible facilities for wheelchair users
Concerns
- Inadequate supervision of cognitively impaired residents (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Poor cleanliness and presence of pests (mentioned by 2 reviewers)
- Inadequate meal frequency or portion size
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 10 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
Questions for Your Tour
- 1It’s wonderful to hear that the ownership is so responsive to families; how do you typically communicate daily updates or changes in a resident's well-being to us?
- 2Since the staff is known for providing such a family-like atmosphere, how do you involve residents in the community to make them feel at home?
- 3What specific protocols do you have in place to ensure residents with cognitive impairments are closely monitored and kept safe throughout the day?
- 4Could you walk us through your daily cleaning schedule and how you ensure the dining and living areas remain pristine for the residents?
- 5What does a typical meal schedule look like, and how do you ensure that portion sizes and nutritional needs are met for every resident?
- 6In the event of a medical emergency during the night, what is the immediate process for contacting doctors or arranging transport to a hospital?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff took care of my mother fo just under 2 years and the treated her like a member of their family.”
“The care giver coordinator at the VA referred me Dempsey's when I was looking for a place for my Uncle. He has been there a few months now and we are very happy with the care he receives.”
“I stayed in the women's home for 1 month and couldn't wait to leave. $900 rent plus a $300 non refundable deposit. They serve 2 tiny meals a day, the fridge and front door are always locked. Cockroaches and bugs.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: AZ State Licensing Agency
Apr 17, 2025Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00216933 and 00216933 conducted on April 17, 2025:
Based on record review and interview, the manager accepted and retained an individual when the primary condition for which the individual needed assisted living services was a behavioral health issue, for one of three resident records reviewed. The deficient practice posed a risk as R1's primary condition was not a physical health issue and the facility is not authorized to provide behavioral health services. Findings include: Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R9-10-101.32. states "Behavioral health issue" means "an individual's condition related to a mental disorder, a personality disorder, substance abuse, or a significant psychological or behavioral response to an identifiable stressor or stressors." 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a service plan for supervisory care services, initiated on July 15, 2019, with updates. The most recent service plan update stated R2 received personal care services. 2. Further review of R2’s service plan revealed R2 had a guardian and the only diagnosis listed in R2’s service plan was schizophrenia. The service plan included R2 was independent for mobility, showering, grooming, oral care, and toileting. R2 received no daily medication, and received a once per month injection of “paliperidone”, received at “Community Partners Healthcare”. 3. In an interview, E1 reported R2 did need assisted living services though was unable to verbalize the need, and agreed the service plan did not identify a primary physical health reason for assisted living services. 4. In an interview, E1 agreed the manager accepted and retained an individual when the primary condition for which the individual needed assisted living services was a behavioral health issue.
Based on documentation review, observation, and interview, for a facility authorized to provide directed care services, the manager failed to ensure there was a means of exiting the facility that provided access to an outside area which allowed a resident to be at least 30 feet away from the facility and controlled or alerted employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unaware of the general or specific whereabouts of a resident. Findings include: 1. A review of Department records revealed the facility was licensed to provide directed care services. 2. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a resident bedroom which included a sliding glass door that led to the backyard. The Compliance officer observed the door did not have an alert and was able to be opened without a key or special knowledge. 3. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed a living room with a sliding glass door that led to the backyard. The door did not have an alert and was able to be opened without a key or special knowledge. 4. In an interview, E1 and E2 acknowledged there was a means of exiting the facility to an outside area which did not control or alert employees of the egress of a resident from the facility. E1 found unused door alarms, which would be installed on the exit doors immediately.
Based on observation and interview, the manager failed to ensure poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were stored in a locked area and inaccessible to residents. Findings include: 1. During an environmental inspection of the facility, the Compliance Officer observed an unlocked laundry room. The Compliance Officer observed two bottles of glass cleaner, a bottle of Listerine, two cans of furniture polish, and a bottle of laundry detergent, stored unsecured on a shelf. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged poisonous or toxic materials stored by the facility were not stored in a locked area and were accessible to residents.
Apr 24, 2024Complaint
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection and investigation of complaints AZ00203891 and AZ00205229 conducted on April 24, 2024:
Based on documentation review, record review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure the health care institution administered a training program for all staff regarding fall prevention and fall recovery. Findings include: 1. A review of facility documentation revealed a policy and procedure titled, "Fall Prevention and Fall Recovery." This policy contained information on fall prevention, fall recovery, and staffing training. 2. A review of E1, E2, and E3's personnel records revealed E1, and E2 had fall prevention and fall recovery training initially and annually, however, E3 did not have documentation indicating that E3 had reviewed or received the fall prevention and fall recovery training. 3. In an interview, E2, acknowledged E3 did not have documentation they reviewed or received the fall prevention and fall recovery training.
Based on documentation review and interview, the manager failed to ensure when a resident had an incident resulting in the resident needing medical services, a caregiver documented any action taken to prevent the incident from occurring in the future. The deficient practice posed a health and safety risk to residents. Findings include: 1. A review of documentation provided by E1 revealed the following: - R2 had an incident resulting in the resident needing medical services on January 13, 2024. The documents did not include "any action taken to prevent the incident from occurring in the future". 2. During an interview, E2 acknowledged that R2's incident report did not include documentation showing any action taken to prevent the incident from occurring in the future.
Apr 24, 2024OtherCleanReport
No deficiencies were found during the on-site modification inspection to increase licensed capacity from 9 to 10 residents completed on April 24, 2024.
May 2, 2023Routine
The following deficiencies were found during the on-site compliance inspection conducted on May 2, 2023 :
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure a resident accepted by the assisted living facility submitted documentation signed by a medical practitioner or a registered nurse stating whether the individual required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints, for two of three residents sampled. The deficient practice posed a risk if the facility was unable to meet a resident's needs. Findings include: 1. A review of R2's medical record revealed a form titled, "Determination for Admission," which was designed to provide documentation stating whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. However, the form was signed and dated twenty two days after R2's date of admission. 2. A review of R3's medical record revealed a form titled, "Determination for Admission," which was designed to provide documentation stating whether the resident required continuous medical services, continuous or intermittent nursing services, or restraints. However, the form was signed and dated three days after R3's date of admission. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R2 and R3's admission forms were completed after R2, and R3's date of admission.
Based on record review, documentation review, and interview, the manager failed to ensure a service plan for a resident receiving personal care services included skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections, and offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration for one of one residents sampled receiving personal care services. Findings include: 1. A review of R1's medical records revealed documentation of a current written service plan for personal care services did not contain the following: - Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; and - Offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration. 2. A review of R2's medical records revealed documentation of a current written service plan for personal care services did not contain the following: - Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; and - Offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration. 3. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R1, and R2's service plans did not include documentation of skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; and offering sufficient fluids to maintain hydration.
Based on record review and interview, the manager failed to ensure the service plan for a resident receiving directed care services included the requirements in R9-10-815(C)(1-5), for one of one directed care residents sampled. Findings include: 1. A review of R3's medical record revealed documentation of service plans indicating R3 was receiving directed care services. However, the service plans did not contain the following: - Skin maintenance to prevent and treat bruises, injuries, pressure sores, and infections; - Incontinence care that ensures that a resident maintains the highest practicable level of independence when toileting; - Encouragement to eat meals and snacks; and - Documentation of the resident's weight, or from a medical practitioner stating that weighing the resident is contraindicated. 2. In an interview, E1 acknowledged R3's service plan did not contain all of the requirements for directed care residents.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
10 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Park Senior Villas at Houghton - Villa Ee
3.3 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Park Senior Villas at Houghton - Villa Hh
3.3 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
La Hacienda Assisted Living Home
4.2 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Broadway Proper Senior Living
5.8 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Dulce Compania Assisted Living LLC
5.9 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ
Heritage Oaks Assisted Living LLC
6.2 miAssisted Living · Tucson, AZ