Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and sincere nursing staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 13 Google reviews
Email Carmel Hills to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Carmel Hills highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and sincere nursing staff, beautiful and uplifting grounds. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Carmel Hills is highly regarded for its compassionate, Christian-oriented care and beautiful, uplifting environment. While long-term families praise the sincere and loving staff, one reviewer raised serious concerns regarding accountability and care quality on the assisted living side.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 13 analyzed
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“Both of my parents called Carmel Hills "home" for close to 20 years. My father passed away after 10 years and mother remained there another 9 years. Such loving care and a christian family atmosphere with such encouragement.”
“One will never find a more sincere caring people anywhere else! My mother never heard “that’s not in my job description “. She felt loved the moment she walked in and everyday she was there.”
“This was, by far, the most wonderful place, regardless of cost, that we encountered.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure medication orders were clarified for one resident regarding oxygen use. Specifically, the order lacked clear direction on how often to check oxygen saturation levels and whether the oxygen was to be administered only at bedtime or as needed throughout the day.
The facility failed to ensure medication orders were clarified with a physician or prescribing practitioner. Specifically, for one resident, oxygen orders lacked direction on how frequently to check oxygen saturation levels to determine when supplemental oxygen was required.
The facility failed to ensure all medication orders were clear and specific. Specifically, an order for aloe vera juice did not specify an amount to be administered, leading staff to follow the product label instead of a precise physician-ordered dose.
The facility failed to clarify medication orders with a physician when orders were not clear or complete. Specifically, for one resident, the order for aloe vera juice did not specify a precise amount to be administered, leading the staff to use the manufacturer's label instructions instead of a verified medical order.
The facility failed to ensure a functional assessment was developed annually for Resident #2. The most recent care plan for this resident was dated 07/08/16, and no updated assessment had been completed since that time.
The facility failed to ensure that participation by a licensed health professional in the review and evaluation of resident health status and care plan updates was completed within 30 days of admission or change in condition. Specifically, there was no documentation of a care plan being completed for Resident #2 since July 2016, despite a decline in the resident's functional status.
The facility failed to ensure a functional assessment was developed annually for one of three sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #2 did not have a current care plan or assessment completed since July 2016, despite changes in their functional status and needs.
The facility failed to ensure that 4 out of 5 sampled staff members had no substantiated findings listed on the North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry (HCPR). Specifically, personnel records for Staff A, B, D, and E lacked documentation of required HCPR checks.
The facility failed to ensure that 4 out of 5 sampled staff members had documentation of a North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry (HCPR) check. Specifically, personnel records for Staff A, B, and E lacked evidence of required HCPR screenings upon hire.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
13 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Sanctuary at Stonehaven 5
< 1 miAdult Family Home · Charlotte, NC
The Post at Providence 2
1.1 miAdult Family Home · Charlotte, NC
Sanctuary at Stonehaven 6
1.4 miAdult Family Home · Charlotte, NC
Brookdale Carriage Club Providence
1.4 miNursing Home · Charlotte, NC
Brookdale Carriage Club Providence I
1.4 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC
Brookdale Carriage Club Providence II
1.4 miAssisted Living · Charlotte, NC