Public Google reviewers rate this highly and often mention compassionate and attentive care staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 23 Google reviews
Email Caremoor Retirement Center to yourself
Get a one-time email with a link to this profile so it is easy to find and share later.
This sends one email and does not add you to a mailing list.
Public Google reviewers rate Caremoor Retirement Center highly. Reviewers highlight: compassionate and attentive care staff, clean and well-maintained facility. Reviewer identity is not verified, and online reviews may not capture everything. Schedule a visit to assess the fit directly.
Families can expect a highly compassionate care team that many reviewers describe as treating residents like family. While several long-term reviews praise the cleanliness and medical care, there are historical concerns regarding staffing shortages and food quality that should be investigated.
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
Concerns
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 23 analyzed
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“Caremoor was amazing for my father and for us, his family. He was only there for 5 months before he passed, but his days spent at Caremoor we his most peaceful days and he was very well cared for.”
“The staff took great care of her and we were extremely pleased with the level of care she received, both medically and socially. They treat all of their residents like family and often have celebrations for holidays, birthdays, and other occasions.”
“My mother in law needed more than we could give her, we decided to take her to Caremoor and never one time did we worry about her. She had the most knowledgeable staff caring for her.”
Source: NC Division of Health Service Regulation
The facility failed to ensure necessary follow-up and referrals for a resident following hospital discharges. Specifically, orders for physical therapy, occupational therapy, wound care, and speech therapy were discontinued upon the resident's return to the facility without notifying the Primary Care Provider.
The facility failed to ensure necessary follow-up care for a resident following a hospital discharge. Specifically, orders for physical therapy, occupational therapy, wound care, and speech therapy were discontinued upon the resident's return to the facility without notifying the Primary Care Provider.
The facility failed to ensure that the assessor signed care plans upon completion. Specifically, two out of three sampled residents were found to have care plans that lacked the required signature from the assessor.
The facility failed to ensure that two out of three sampled residents had accurate care plans signed by the assessor upon completion. Specifically, the care plans for Resident #1 and Resident #2 were not signed by the assessor.
The facility failed to ensure proper referral and follow-up to meet the acute healthcare needs of a resident. Specifically, the provider was not notified of low blood pressure and low heart rate readings for Resident #2.
The facility failed to ensure the provision of transportation for a resident's necessary medical appointments. Specifically, the facility canceled or rescheduled multiple dermatologist appointments for a resident and attempted to charge the resident's family for transportation services.
The facility failed to maintain an accurate and current listing of residents with physician-ordered therapeutic diets. Specifically, for 2 of 7 sampled residents, the kitchen's diet list did not reflect required modifications such as mechanical soft consistency or cardiac diet specifications.
The facility failed to maintain an accurate and current listing of residents with physician-ordered therapeutic diets. Specifically, for 2 of 7 sampled residents, the posted diet list did not match the physician's orders regarding mechanical soft consistency and cardiac diet requirements.
The facility failed to ensure that 3 of 4 sampled staff members had no substantiated findings listed on the North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry (HCPR) prior to their hire. Specifically, documentation for Staff A, C, and D showed HCPR checks were completed after their start dates.
The facility failed to ensure a criminal background check was completed prior to hire for 3 of 4 sampled staff members (Staff A, B, and C). For Staff A, the background check documentation was dated 10/07/15, which was after the 09/01/15 hire date.
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
23 reviews from families & visitors
NC DHSR — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Some summaries, interpretations, suggested questions, and pricing research are AI-generated or AI-assisted and may contain errors or omit important context. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
The Carriage House of Caremoor
< 1 miAdult Family Home · Kannapolis, NC
The Landings of Cabarrus
< 1 miAssisted Living · Kannapolis, NC
Ann St of Shady Brook
2.0 miAdult Family Home · Kannapolis, NC
Ann St of Shady Brook II
2.1 miAdult Family Home · Kannapolis, NC
Ann Street Senior Living
2.4 miAdult Family Home · Kannapolis, NC
Best of Care Fch
2.6 miAdult Family Home · Kannapolis, NC