Cantril House Assisted Living
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight high staff-to-resident ratio in memory care. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 10 Google reviews

Watch Cantril House Assisted Living
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
Cantril House is an excellent choice for families seeking a personalized, non-institutional environment where staff truly engage with residents. The high staff-to-resident ratio in memory care is a standout feature that provides peace of mind for those managing more complex needs.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
10 reviews on Google“Cantril House is highly regarded for its small, home-like atmosphere that avoids the clinical feel of larger facilities. Families specifically praise the high staff-to-resident ratio in memory care and the genuine, personal connections staff form with residents.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- High staff-to-resident ratio in memory care
- Warm, home-like residential atmosphere
- Attentive and personalized staff care
- Engaging resident activities and social community
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 10 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
Questions for Your Tour
- 1Since the community is so small and intimate, how do you ensure each resident gets a truly personalized care plan that feels like home?
- 2With such a high staff-to-resident ratio, how does that extra attention manifest in the daily care of residents in the memory care wing?
- 3What kind of social activities or community outings do you organize to keep the residents engaged and connected with each other?
- 4How does the team handle medical emergencies or changes in health needs during the overnight hours?
- 5How do you maintain that warm, residential atmosphere while still ensuring all the necessary clinical and safety standards are met?
- 6In what ways does the staff interact with families to keep us updated on our loved one's well-being and daily happiness?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“This is the best staff, and best place, for somebody who needs memory care. After visiting several and talking to dozens, I couldn’t be more thrilled with how well this is going. They have a very high ratio of staff to residents, much higher than anywhere else within 30 miles of Castle Rock.”
“My elderly father moved here from his long time home in Illinois 4 years ago. He found incredible friendships with the other residents and Cantril's amazing staff. They truly were his second family. along with mine.”
“She chose this house because it is like a home not a buisness. She could get around on her own but help was always available if needed. A gorgeous outside patio that she can easily access without assistance.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
Apr 14, 2026Follow-upCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Dec 9, 2025OtherCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Dec 9, 2025Other
A relicensure survey was completed on 12/9/25. A deficiency was cited. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to have an involuntary discharge grievance policy that complied with Section 25-27-104.3, C.R.S (A-I), affecting 13 current residents. Findings include: On 12/9/25 at approximately 8:00 a.m., the Involuntary Discharge Grievance Policy was requested; however, the residence was unable to provide an Involuntary Discharge Grievance Policy that included the required elements of Chapter 7 Regulation 9.3 (A-I).On 12/9/25 at 3:00 p.m., the administrator stated she was aware of the current state regulation; however, she believed their existing discharge and grievance policies were sufficient, and did not need to create a new policy.
May 19, 2025Follow-up
A relicensure revisit was completed on 5/19/25 for the previous deficiencies cited on 12/7/22. The residence is in compliance with all regulations surveyed.The deficiencies cited for Event PNDS12 were cited prior to the regulation revision that was implemented on 3/17/25. Citation coded "0000" or "9999" are initial and final comments of an inspection for informational purposes, this field may also have been left blank intentionally
May 19, 2025Follow-upCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Apr 23, 2025OtherCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Feb 21, 2025Other
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain fire barriers and fire doors in accordance with NFPA 101 Chapter 33,8 and 7. The second-floor east stairwell is locked in the path of egress. The gate at the bottom of the stairs does not free egress. Revisited on 2/21/2025 citation not corrected.33.3.2.2.2 Doors.Doors in means of egress shall be as follows:(1) Doors complying with 7.2.1 shall be permitted.(2) Doors within individual rooms and suites of rooms shall be permitted to be swinging or sliding.(3) No door in any means of egress, other than those meeting the requirement of 33.3.2.2.2(4) or (5), shall be locked against egress when the building is occupied.(4) Delayed-egress locks in accordance with 7.2.1.6.1 shall be permitted.(5) Access-controlled egress doors in accordance with 7.2.1.6.2 shall be permitted.(6) Revolving doors complying with 7.2.1.10 shall be permitted.7.2.1.1.2 Every door opening and every principal entrance that is required to serve as an exit shall be designed and constructed so that the path of egress travel is obvious and direct. Windows that, because of their physical configuration or design and the materials used in their construction, have the potential to be mistaken for door openings shall be made inaccessible to the occupants by barriers or railings.This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. The administrator and maintenance director discussed deficient items at the exit conference. Revisit of 12/16/2024 complaint survey was completed on 02/21/2025. One deficiency was recited.
Dec 16, 2024Other
A survey prompted by CO#38683 was completed on 12/16/2024. Two deficiencies were cited.The initial comments (ID Prefix Tag #P000) are informational only and represent the facility' s general characteristics. The facility shall maintain and not diminish the existing life safety features that met the requirements during licensure or certification.This facility has a license for 16 beds. The facility is a two-story, Type V (000) with a complete 13-R fire sprinkler system. This survey, conducted December 16, 2024, inspected for compliance with the fire safety requirements for a small residential board and care facility using the 2003 edition of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Code®, Chapter 33, entitled, "Existing Residential Board and Care Occupancies," as well as the 2010 edition of NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety. Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain fire barriers and fire doors in accordance with NFPA 101 Chapter 33,8 and 7. The second-floor east stairwell is locked in the path of egress. The gate at the bottom of the stairs does not free egress.33.3.2.2.2 Doors.Doors in means of egress shall be as follows:(1) Doors complying with 7.2.1 shall be permitted.(2) Doors within individual rooms and suites of rooms shall be permitted to be swinging or sliding.(3) No door in any means of egress, other than those meeting the requirement of 33.3.2.2.2(4) or (5), shall be locked against egress when the building is occupied.(4) Delayed-egress locks in accordance with 7.2.1.6.1 shall be permitted.(5) Access-controlled egress doors in accordance with 7.2.1.6.2 shall be permitted.(6) Revolving doors complying with 7.2.1.10 shall be permitted.7.2.1.1.2 Every door opening and every principal entrance that is required to serve as an exit shall be designed and constructed so that the path of egress travel is obvious and direct. Windows that, because of their physical configuration or design and the materials used in their construction, have the potential to be mistaken for door openings shall be made inaccessible to the occupants by barriers or railings.This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visit.. Through observation during the documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the protection requirements in accordance with NFPA 101, 25, 72, and 13.A new fire alarm panel was installed without plansFire sprinkler redesigns without an approved permit.33.3.3.4.6.2 Where a new fire alarm system is installed, or the existing fire alarm system is replaced, emergency forces notification shall be provided in accordance with 9.6.4.9.6.4.3 For existing installations where none of the means of notification specified in 9.6.4.2(1) through (4) are available, an approved plan for notification of the municipal fire department shall be permitted.33.3.3.5.1* General.Where an automatic sprinkler system is installed, for either total or partial building coverage, the system shall be installed in accordance with Section 9.7, as modified by 33.3.3.5.1.1, 33.3.3.5.1.2, and 33.3.3.5.1.3.3.2.1* Approved.Acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.5.4.3* Installation and Acceptance Testing.Where maintenance or repair requires the replacement of sprinkler system components affecting more than 20 sprinklers, those components shall be installed and tested in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems.This deficiency has the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors throug..
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
10 reviews from families & visitors
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives
Serenity at Woodlands LLC
< 1 miAssisted Living · Castle Rock, CO
Valley House Assisted Living
< 1 miAssisted Living · Castle Rock, CO
Assured Senior Living 5
1.5 miAssisted Living · Castle Rock, CO
Assured Senior Living 5
1.5 miAssisted Living · Castle Rock, CO
Gardens Care Homes - Red Hawk, the
1.6 miAssisted Living · Castle Rock, CO
Assured Senior Living 4
1.7 miAssisted Living · Castle Rock, CO