Bridge at Alamosa the
Families consistently rate this highly — reviewers highlight compassionate and attentive staff. Schedule a visit to confirm the fit.
based on 19 Google reviews

Watch Bridge at Alamosa the
Get an email when new inspections, ratings, or penalties are published for this facility.
We’ll only email you about this — no spam, unsubscribe anytime.
What this means for your family
The Bridge at Alamosa is highly regarded for its compassionate staff and robust activity programming, making it a strong candidate for those prioritizing social engagement and personalized care. Families should feel confident in the facility's long-standing reputation for treating residents like family, though as with any facility, we recommend scheduling a tour to observe current staffing dynamics firsthand.
Google Reviews
Google Reviews
19 reviews on Google“The Bridge at Alamosa receives consistent praise for its compassionate, family-oriented staff and high-quality care environment. Reviewers frequently highlight the variety of engaging activities, such as bingo and exercise classes, and appreciate the facility's clean, lodge-like aesthetic.”
Quality Themes
Tap a score for detailsStrengths
- Compassionate and attentive staff
- Engaging social activities and outings
- Clean and well-maintained facility
- Effective medication management
Rating Trends
Tap a year to see what changed
Distribution · 22 analyzed
How They Respond to Reviews
This facility rarely responds to reviews.
Questions for Your Tour
- 1With your active calendar of outings and social events, how do you help new residents feel comfortable joining in and connecting with others right away?
- 2I noticed your team is highly praised for being attentive; what is the process for ensuring families stay informed about their loved one's daily well-being?
- 3Given your strong reputation for medication management, how do you handle adjustments to a resident's routine if their medical needs change over time?
- 4Since you maintain such a clean and well-kept environment, what is your approach to ensuring residents feel like they are in a comfortable home rather than a clinical setting?
- 5I see you occasionally respond to feedback online; how do you use family input to continue improving the quality of care provided here?
- 6In the event of a medical emergency, what is the specific protocol for notifying family members and coordinating with local healthcare providers?
Personalized based on this facility's data
Key Review Excerpts
“The staff treats her with respect, patience, and kindness. I'd give them more than 5 stars if I could.”
“The staff accommodated her every need often going above and beyond to care for her. They were very polite, respectful, professional, flexible, resilient and exhibited high levels of patience during adverse times.”
“The Bridge staff did a GREAT JOB with her!! As an AD patient my Mother needed a high level of care. The wonderful Bridge staff did a superb job of caring for my Mother providing quality care with gentleness, patience, kindness and compassion.”
State Inspection History
State Inspections
Source: CO Dept. of Public Health & Environment
Jan 11, 2024Complaint
A relicensure survey with complaint #CO34178 was completed on 1/12/23. Deficiencies were cited. Based on interview and record review, the administrator and the qualified medication administration person (QMAP) supervisor failed to, on a quarterly basis, audit the accuracy and completeness of the medication administration records (MARs), controlled substance list, and medication disposal records, affecting four of four sample residents (#.. Based on interview and record review, the residence failed to ensure that each qualified medication administration person (QMAP) accurately documented each medication administration or monitoring event at the time the event was completed for each resident, affecting two of four sample residents (#2, #4). Findings include:1. Residence PolicyTh.. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the residence failed to have at least one staff member onsite at all times who has current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and obstructed airway techniques from a nationally recognized organization such as the American Red Cross, the American Heart Association, the National S.. Based on record review and interview the residence failed to ensure applicants complied with Colorado Adult Protective Service Data System (CAPS) requirements prior to hiring staff who provided care to the residents, for two of three sample staff (#1, housekeeper) affecting 41 current residents.Findings include:1. Referencesa. According to Co.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to have a roster of current residents, including emergency contact information and a residence diagram showing room locations, affecting 41 current residents.Findings include: 1. Record review On 1/11/24 at 7:20 a.m., a resident roster of was provided by Staff #1. However, the roster did not.. Based on record review and interview, the residence failed to provide, upon request, residence documents, staff information, and other records requested by the department, affecting 41 current residents. (Cross-reference Q734, Q910, Q1514, Q1510)Findings include:1. Referencesa. Chapter VII regulations governing assisted living residences, pa.. Based on record review and interviews, the residence failed to discharge residents who had displayed a rapid cognitive decline that resulted in safety concerns affecting one sample resident (#1). (Cross-reference Q720) 1. Residence Policiesa. The residence' s Residency Agreement, dated April 2016, read "if a resident had a cognitive change, decline.. Based on record review, observation and interview the residence failed to request a name-based criminal history check, prior to staff hire for each prospective staff member for three of three sample staff (#1, #2, the housekeeper), affecting 41 current residents.Findings include:1. ReferencesChapter VII regulations governing assisted living residen.. Based on record review, observation, and interview the residence failed to ensure each staff member was provided training relevant to their specific duties and responsibilities prior to working independently, for one staff member (the housekeeper), affecting 41 current residents.Findings include:1. Referencesa. Chapter VII regulations governing assis.. Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the residence failed to ensure appropriate routine staffing levels, at a minimum, considering the acuity and needs of the residents, the services outlined in the care plan, and services set forth in the resident agreement, affecting three of four sample residents. (Cross-reference 1060)Findings..
Jan 11, 2024Follow-upCleanReport
No deficiencies found during this inspection.
Contact
Get in Touch
Contact this facility directly and verify the details that matter most to your family.
References & Resources
Google Maps
Photos, directions & neighborhood info
Google Reviews
19 reviews from families & visitors
Official Website
Visit centurypa.com
Medicare data downloads
Original nursing home datasets
CO CDPHE — View Official Record
Public-record source of inspection history and licensure data shown on this page
EveryPlace is a research directory. Facility information is compiled from public sources — Medicare.gov, state licensing portals, Google Places, and publicly available street-level imagery. Listings do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, or advertisement, and we do not accept payment for placement. Families should verify all details directly with the facility and the original sources linked above before making any care decisions. See our Research Policy for our editorial standards, correction process, and image-removal policy.
Nearby Alternatives